Comparison of LDA and SPRT on Clinical Dataset Classifications.

Chih Lee, Brittany Nkounkou, Chun-Hsi Huang
{"title":"Comparison of LDA and SPRT on Clinical Dataset Classifications.","authors":"Chih Lee,&nbsp;Brittany Nkounkou,&nbsp;Chun-Hsi Huang","doi":"10.4137/BII.S6935","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this work, we investigate the well-known classification algorithm LDA as well as its close relative SPRT. SPRT affords many theoretical advantages over LDA. It allows specification of desired classification error rates α and β and is expected to be faster in predicting the class label of a new instance. However, SPRT is not as widely used as LDA in the pattern recognition and machine learning community. For this reason, we investigate LDA, SPRT and a modified SPRT (MSPRT) empirically using clinical datasets from Parkinson's disease, colon cancer, and breast cancer. We assume the same normality assumption as LDA and propose variants of the two SPRT algorithms based on the order in which the components of an instance are sampled. Leave-one-out cross-validation is used to assess and compare the performance of the methods. The results indicate that two variants, SPRT-ordered and MSPRT-ordered, are superior to LDA in terms of prediction accuracy. Moreover, on average SPRT-ordered and MSPRT-ordered examine less components than LDA before arriving at a decision. These advantages imply that SPRT-ordered and MSPRT-ordered are the preferred algorithms over LDA when the normality assumption can be justified for a dataset.</p>","PeriodicalId":88397,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical informatics insights","volume":"4 ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4137/BII.S6935","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical informatics insights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4137/BII.S6935","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

In this work, we investigate the well-known classification algorithm LDA as well as its close relative SPRT. SPRT affords many theoretical advantages over LDA. It allows specification of desired classification error rates α and β and is expected to be faster in predicting the class label of a new instance. However, SPRT is not as widely used as LDA in the pattern recognition and machine learning community. For this reason, we investigate LDA, SPRT and a modified SPRT (MSPRT) empirically using clinical datasets from Parkinson's disease, colon cancer, and breast cancer. We assume the same normality assumption as LDA and propose variants of the two SPRT algorithms based on the order in which the components of an instance are sampled. Leave-one-out cross-validation is used to assess and compare the performance of the methods. The results indicate that two variants, SPRT-ordered and MSPRT-ordered, are superior to LDA in terms of prediction accuracy. Moreover, on average SPRT-ordered and MSPRT-ordered examine less components than LDA before arriving at a decision. These advantages imply that SPRT-ordered and MSPRT-ordered are the preferred algorithms over LDA when the normality assumption can be justified for a dataset.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

LDA与SPRT在临床数据集分类上的比较。
在这项工作中,我们研究了著名的分类算法LDA及其近亲SPRT。与LDA相比,SPRT在理论上具有许多优势。它允许指定期望的分类错误率α和β,并且有望更快地预测新实例的类标签。然而,SPRT在模式识别和机器学习领域的应用并不像LDA那样广泛。因此,我们利用帕金森病、结肠癌和乳腺癌的临床数据集对LDA、SPRT和改良的SPRT (MSPRT)进行了实证研究。我们假设了与LDA相同的正态性假设,并根据采样实例组件的顺序提出了两种SPRT算法的变体。留一交叉验证用于评估和比较方法的性能。结果表明,SPRT-ordered和MSPRT-ordered两种变体在预测精度上都优于LDA。此外,平均而言,SPRT-ordered和MSPRT-ordered在做出决策之前检查的组件比LDA少。这些优势意味着,当数据集的正态性假设可以被证明时,SPRT-ordered和MSPRT-ordered是LDA的首选算法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信