{"title":"Quantitative risk assessment of sour gas transmission pipelines using CFD","authors":"Mojtaba Bagheri , Amin Alamdari , Mehdi Davoudi","doi":"10.1016/j.jngse.2016.02.057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Sour gas is more dangerous than sweet gas because of its hydrogen sulfide<span> contents, so it requires more safety considerations. The safety aspects of long pipelines for transportation of sour gas have been always of concern because of the potential populated area, high pressure and presence of toxic compounds of pipelines. In this study, the risk assessment studies have been done for sour gas transport pipeline using a combination of CFD method and dose–response model. Three different release cases include small, medium and large size hole were studied and two different angles were considered for gas jet outlet, horizontal and 45° angle from the horizon. The individual risk was determined for ten points on the ground surface in the vicinity of pipeline with 10 m gap distance. Probability and fatality diagrams were obtained in each case. Results show individual risk can be neglected in the case 45° angle from the horizon. The value of risk at 10 m distance from the pipeline was approximately 3.2 times more than the risk value at 100 m distance. As a case study, a real gas transmission pipeline is investigated in the adjacent area which is categorized in accordance to its assigned individual risk. The case study is a sour gas transmission pipeline that is placed in south of Iran. In this study, minimum individual risk of 8.27537 E</span></span><sup>−06</sup> (yr<sup>−1</sup>) is determined at 100 m distance to pipeline, so it can be concluded that for this pipeline, safe distance is more than 100 m.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":372,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering","volume":"31 ","pages":"Pages 108-118"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2016-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jngse.2016.02.057","citationCount":"22","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1875510016301020","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22
Abstract
Sour gas is more dangerous than sweet gas because of its hydrogen sulfide contents, so it requires more safety considerations. The safety aspects of long pipelines for transportation of sour gas have been always of concern because of the potential populated area, high pressure and presence of toxic compounds of pipelines. In this study, the risk assessment studies have been done for sour gas transport pipeline using a combination of CFD method and dose–response model. Three different release cases include small, medium and large size hole were studied and two different angles were considered for gas jet outlet, horizontal and 45° angle from the horizon. The individual risk was determined for ten points on the ground surface in the vicinity of pipeline with 10 m gap distance. Probability and fatality diagrams were obtained in each case. Results show individual risk can be neglected in the case 45° angle from the horizon. The value of risk at 10 m distance from the pipeline was approximately 3.2 times more than the risk value at 100 m distance. As a case study, a real gas transmission pipeline is investigated in the adjacent area which is categorized in accordance to its assigned individual risk. The case study is a sour gas transmission pipeline that is placed in south of Iran. In this study, minimum individual risk of 8.27537 E−06 (yr−1) is determined at 100 m distance to pipeline, so it can be concluded that for this pipeline, safe distance is more than 100 m.
期刊介绍:
The objective of the Journal of Natural Gas Science & Engineering is to bridge the gap between the engineering and the science of natural gas by publishing explicitly written articles intelligible to scientists and engineers working in any field of natural gas science and engineering from the reservoir to the market.
An attempt is made in all issues to balance the subject matter and to appeal to a broad readership. The Journal of Natural Gas Science & Engineering covers the fields of natural gas exploration, production, processing and transmission in its broadest possible sense. Topics include: origin and accumulation of natural gas; natural gas geochemistry; gas-reservoir engineering; well logging, testing and evaluation; mathematical modelling; enhanced gas recovery; thermodynamics and phase behaviour, gas-reservoir modelling and simulation; natural gas production engineering; primary and enhanced production from unconventional gas resources, subsurface issues related to coalbed methane, tight gas, shale gas, and hydrate production, formation evaluation; exploration methods, multiphase flow and flow assurance issues, novel processing (e.g., subsea) techniques, raw gas transmission methods, gas processing/LNG technologies, sales gas transmission and storage. The Journal of Natural Gas Science & Engineering will also focus on economical, environmental, management and safety issues related to natural gas production, processing and transportation.