Darbepoetin versus epoetin alfa for the correction of anemia in cancer patients receiving radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy treatment.

Clinical medicine. Oncology Pub Date : 2008-01-01 Epub Date: 2008-05-19 DOI:10.4137/cmo.s510
Pilar Ma Samper Ots, Concepción López Carrizosa, Aurora Rodríguez Pérez, Juan de Dios Saez Garrido, José Ma Delgado Pérez
{"title":"Darbepoetin versus epoetin alfa for the correction of anemia in cancer patients receiving radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy treatment.","authors":"Pilar Ma Samper Ots, Concepción López Carrizosa, Aurora Rodríguez Pérez, Juan de Dios Saez Garrido, José Ma Delgado Pérez","doi":"10.4137/cmo.s510","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Anemia is the most frequent hematological disturbance in cancer patients, with prevalence between 30% and 90%, depending on the type of tumor, the antitumor treatment, and other factors (infection, malnutrition, bleeding, tumor infiltration of the bone marrow). A number of erythropoietic agents have shown to be effective in increasing the hemoglobin (Hb) levels, reducing the requirements for transfusion, and improving quality of life. The objective of this study is to compare darbepoetin alfa and epoetin alfa when used to correct anemia in cancer patients who are receiving radiotherapy or radiochemotherapy.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A prospective study of 125 consecutive patients with anemia (Hb <13 g/dL in males or <12 g/dL in females) who were undergoing treatment with radiotherapy (RT) or radiochemotherapy (RCT) in our department were enrolled between March 2003 and March 2005. The treatment for the anemia was either darbepoetin alfa 150 mcg/week (62 patients, group 1) or epoetin alfa 40,000 IU/week (63 patients, group 2). Patients received iron supplements in both groups. Treatment was administered in a consecutive manner depending on tumor type. If the increase in Hb was <1 g/dL after 4 weeks of treatment, the dose was increased to 300 mcg/week in group 1 or to 60,000 IU/week in group 2. The treatment was terminated when a Hb value of ≥15 g/dL was reached during RT treatment, a Hb value of ≥14 g/dL was reached if the RT had been completed, or after 16 weeks of treatment whatever the Hb value. The mean age of patients was 63.36 ± 11.27 years, 67% were male. No significant differences were observed between the 2 groups in tumor type or stage, previous treatments, or intent to treat with RT or RCT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Comparing group 1 and group 2 by intent to treat, the mean Hb at the start of treatment with the study drug was 12.1 g/dL vs 11.8 g/dL, the proportion of patients whose dose was increased was 19.7% vs 24.6%, the need for transfusion was 3.2% in each group, the duration of erythropoietic treatment was 6.5 weeks in both groups, and 2 patients in group 2 restarted treatment with epoetin alfa. The percentage of patients who responded (defined as an increase in the Hb ≥ 2 g/dL in the absence of transfusions) was of 72.6% and 66.7%, respectively. Four vascular adverse events were observed, 2 in each group. No significant differences were observed with respect to the baseline, week 4, and week 12 levels of endogenous erythropoietin, serum iron,% saturation, and ferritin. The increase in Hb 1 month after the final administration of the study drug was 2.21 g/dL in group 1 and 2.46 g/dL in group 2 (p = ns).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results of our study demonstrate that both treatments are equally effective in correcting anemia in cancer patients undergoing RT or RCT.</p>","PeriodicalId":88451,"journal":{"name":"Clinical medicine. Oncology","volume":"2 ","pages":"393-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3161674/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical medicine. Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4137/cmo.s510","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2008/5/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Anemia is the most frequent hematological disturbance in cancer patients, with prevalence between 30% and 90%, depending on the type of tumor, the antitumor treatment, and other factors (infection, malnutrition, bleeding, tumor infiltration of the bone marrow). A number of erythropoietic agents have shown to be effective in increasing the hemoglobin (Hb) levels, reducing the requirements for transfusion, and improving quality of life. The objective of this study is to compare darbepoetin alfa and epoetin alfa when used to correct anemia in cancer patients who are receiving radiotherapy or radiochemotherapy.

Material and methods: A prospective study of 125 consecutive patients with anemia (Hb <13 g/dL in males or <12 g/dL in females) who were undergoing treatment with radiotherapy (RT) or radiochemotherapy (RCT) in our department were enrolled between March 2003 and March 2005. The treatment for the anemia was either darbepoetin alfa 150 mcg/week (62 patients, group 1) or epoetin alfa 40,000 IU/week (63 patients, group 2). Patients received iron supplements in both groups. Treatment was administered in a consecutive manner depending on tumor type. If the increase in Hb was <1 g/dL after 4 weeks of treatment, the dose was increased to 300 mcg/week in group 1 or to 60,000 IU/week in group 2. The treatment was terminated when a Hb value of ≥15 g/dL was reached during RT treatment, a Hb value of ≥14 g/dL was reached if the RT had been completed, or after 16 weeks of treatment whatever the Hb value. The mean age of patients was 63.36 ± 11.27 years, 67% were male. No significant differences were observed between the 2 groups in tumor type or stage, previous treatments, or intent to treat with RT or RCT.

Results: Comparing group 1 and group 2 by intent to treat, the mean Hb at the start of treatment with the study drug was 12.1 g/dL vs 11.8 g/dL, the proportion of patients whose dose was increased was 19.7% vs 24.6%, the need for transfusion was 3.2% in each group, the duration of erythropoietic treatment was 6.5 weeks in both groups, and 2 patients in group 2 restarted treatment with epoetin alfa. The percentage of patients who responded (defined as an increase in the Hb ≥ 2 g/dL in the absence of transfusions) was of 72.6% and 66.7%, respectively. Four vascular adverse events were observed, 2 in each group. No significant differences were observed with respect to the baseline, week 4, and week 12 levels of endogenous erythropoietin, serum iron,% saturation, and ferritin. The increase in Hb 1 month after the final administration of the study drug was 2.21 g/dL in group 1 and 2.46 g/dL in group 2 (p = ns).

Conclusions: The results of our study demonstrate that both treatments are equally effective in correcting anemia in cancer patients undergoing RT or RCT.

Abstract Image

在纠正接受放疗或化疗的癌症患者的贫血症方面,Darbepoetin 与 epoetin alfa 孰优孰劣。
简介贫血是癌症患者最常见的血液病,发病率在 30% 至 90% 之间,具体取决于肿瘤类型、抗肿瘤治疗和其他因素(感染、营养不良、出血、骨髓肿瘤浸润)。许多促红细胞生成药物在提高血红蛋白(Hb)水平、减少输血需求和改善生活质量方面已显示出效果。本研究的目的是比较达贝泊汀α和环氧乙烷α用于纠正接受放疗或放化疗的癌症患者贫血的效果:前瞻性研究:对125名连续贫血患者(Hb结果:1组和2组)进行前瞻性研究:通过意向治疗比较第1组和第2组,研究药物开始治疗时的平均Hb为12.1 g/dL vs 11.8 g/dL,剂量增加的患者比例为19.7% vs 24.6%,两组中需要输血的患者比例均为3.2%,两组患者的红细胞生成素治疗持续时间均为6.5周,第2组中有2名患者重新开始了环氧乙烷治疗。有反应(定义为在不输血的情况下 Hb 升高≥ 2 g/dL)的患者比例分别为 72.6% 和 66.7%。观察到四例血管不良事件,每组各两例。在内源性促红细胞生成素、血清铁、饱和度和铁蛋白的基线、第 4 周和第 12 周水平方面,未观察到明显差异。最终用药 1 个月后,第 1 组 Hb 增高 2.21 g/dL,第 2 组 Hb 增高 2.46 g/dL(P = ns):我们的研究结果表明,两种治疗方法在纠正接受 RT 或 RCT 治疗的癌症患者的贫血方面同样有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书