A phantom study on target localization accuracy using cone-beam computed tomography.

Clinical medicine. Oncology Pub Date : 2008-01-01 Epub Date: 2008-08-18 DOI:10.4137/cmo.s808
Hui Yan, Liwei Zhang, Fang-Fang Yin
{"title":"A phantom study on target localization accuracy using cone-beam computed tomography.","authors":"Hui Yan,&nbsp;Liwei Zhang,&nbsp;Fang-Fang Yin","doi":"10.4137/cmo.s808","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this study is to evaluate the 3-dimensional target localization accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) using an on-board imager (OBI). An anthropomorphic pelvis phantom was used to simulate a range of offsets in the three translational directions and rotations around each of the three axes. After a translational or rotational offset was applied, a CBCT scan of the phantom was followed by image registration to detect the offsets in six degrees. The detected offsets were compared to the offset actually applied to give the detection error of the phantom position. Afterwards, the phantom was positioned by automatically moving the couch based on the detected offsets. A second CBCT scan followed by image registration was performed to give the residual error of the phantom positioning. On the average the detection errors and their standard deviations along the lateral, longitudinal and vertical axis are 0.3 ± 0.1, 0.3 ± 0.1 and 0.4 ± 0.1 mm respectively with respect to translational shifts ranging from 0 to 10 mm. The corresponding residual errors after positioning are 0.3 ± 0.1, 0.5 ± 0.1 and 0.3 ± 0.1 mm. For simulated rotational shifts ranging from 0 to 5 degrees, the average detection error and their standard deviation around lateral, longitudinal, and vertical axes are 0.1 ± 0.0, 0.2 ± 0.0, and 0.2 ± 0.0 degrees respectively. The residual errors after positioning are 0.4 ± 0.1, 0.6 ± 0.1, and 0.3 ± 0.1 mm along the lateral, longitudinal and vertical directions. These results indicate that target localization based on CBCT is capable of achieving sub-millimeter accuracy.</p>","PeriodicalId":88451,"journal":{"name":"Clinical medicine. Oncology","volume":"2 ","pages":"501-10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4137/cmo.s808","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical medicine. Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4137/cmo.s808","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2008/8/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the 3-dimensional target localization accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) using an on-board imager (OBI). An anthropomorphic pelvis phantom was used to simulate a range of offsets in the three translational directions and rotations around each of the three axes. After a translational or rotational offset was applied, a CBCT scan of the phantom was followed by image registration to detect the offsets in six degrees. The detected offsets were compared to the offset actually applied to give the detection error of the phantom position. Afterwards, the phantom was positioned by automatically moving the couch based on the detected offsets. A second CBCT scan followed by image registration was performed to give the residual error of the phantom positioning. On the average the detection errors and their standard deviations along the lateral, longitudinal and vertical axis are 0.3 ± 0.1, 0.3 ± 0.1 and 0.4 ± 0.1 mm respectively with respect to translational shifts ranging from 0 to 10 mm. The corresponding residual errors after positioning are 0.3 ± 0.1, 0.5 ± 0.1 and 0.3 ± 0.1 mm. For simulated rotational shifts ranging from 0 to 5 degrees, the average detection error and their standard deviation around lateral, longitudinal, and vertical axes are 0.1 ± 0.0, 0.2 ± 0.0, and 0.2 ± 0.0 degrees respectively. The residual errors after positioning are 0.4 ± 0.1, 0.6 ± 0.1, and 0.3 ± 0.1 mm along the lateral, longitudinal and vertical directions. These results indicate that target localization based on CBCT is capable of achieving sub-millimeter accuracy.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

锥束计算机断层扫描靶定位精度的模拟研究。
本研究的目的是评估使用机载成像仪(OBI)的锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)的三维目标定位精度。一个拟人化的骨盆幻影被用来模拟在三个平移方向上的一系列偏移和围绕三个轴的旋转。在应用平移或旋转偏移后,对幻影进行CBCT扫描,然后进行图像配准以检测六度偏移。将检测到的偏移量与实际应用的偏移量进行比较,从而给出幻影位置的检测误差。之后,根据检测到的偏移量,通过自动移动沙发来定位幻影。进行第二次CBCT扫描,然后进行图像配准,以获得幻影定位的残余误差。在0 ~ 10 mm的平移范围内,横向、纵向和垂直方向的平均检测误差及其标准差分别为0.3±0.1、0.3±0.1和0.4±0.1 mm。相应的定位后残差分别为0.3±0.1、0.5±0.1和0.3±0.1 mm。在0 ~ 5度的模拟旋转位移范围内,横向、纵向和垂直轴的平均检测误差和标准差分别为0.1±0.0、0.2±0.0和0.2±0.0度。定位后的横向、纵向、纵向残差分别为0.4±0.1、0.6±0.1、0.3±0.1 mm。这些结果表明,基于CBCT的目标定位能够达到亚毫米精度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信