The efficacy of oral brush biopsy with computer-assisted analysis in identifying precancerous and cancerous lesions.

Ravi Mehrotra, Sanjay Mishra, Mamta Singh, Mangal Singh
{"title":"The efficacy of oral brush biopsy with computer-assisted analysis in identifying precancerous and cancerous lesions.","authors":"Ravi Mehrotra,&nbsp;Sanjay Mishra,&nbsp;Mamta Singh,&nbsp;Mangal Singh","doi":"10.1186/1758-3284-3-39","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cancer of the oral cavity is the sixth most common malignancy reported worldwide and one with the highest mortality rate among all malignancies. There is a paucity of reliable diagnostic methods to detect early malignancies. This study was performed to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of brush biopsy in identifying oral premalignant and malignant lesions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Oral brush and scalpel biopsies were performed on 85 consecutive patients presenting with an oral lesion deemed to be minimally suspicious by clinical examination and the results were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 79 patients with adequate brush biopsy samples with matching scalpel biopsies, 27 revealed histopathologic evidence of dysplasia or carcinoma, 26 of which were independently identified with the oral brush biopsy (sensitivity: 96.3%-95% CI, 87%-100%). 52 oral lesions did not reveal any histopathologic evidence of dysplasia or carcinoma and of these, brush biopsy reported 47 as \"negative\" and 5 as \"atypical\"(specificity of \"positive\" brush biopsy result is 100%- 95% CI, 93%-100%; specificity for \"atypical\" brush biopsy result is 90.4%-95% CI, 82%-97%. The positive predictive value of an abnormal oral brush biopsy was 84% and the negative predictive value was 98%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study demonstrated that the oral brush biopsy is an accurate test in identifying oral premalignant and malignant lesions, even if minimally suspicious.</p>","PeriodicalId":49195,"journal":{"name":"Head and Neck Optical Diagnostics Society","volume":"3 ","pages":"39"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/1758-3284-3-39","citationCount":"58","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Head and Neck Optical Diagnostics Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/1758-3284-3-39","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 58

Abstract

Background: Cancer of the oral cavity is the sixth most common malignancy reported worldwide and one with the highest mortality rate among all malignancies. There is a paucity of reliable diagnostic methods to detect early malignancies. This study was performed to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of brush biopsy in identifying oral premalignant and malignant lesions.

Methods: Oral brush and scalpel biopsies were performed on 85 consecutive patients presenting with an oral lesion deemed to be minimally suspicious by clinical examination and the results were compared.

Results: Of 79 patients with adequate brush biopsy samples with matching scalpel biopsies, 27 revealed histopathologic evidence of dysplasia or carcinoma, 26 of which were independently identified with the oral brush biopsy (sensitivity: 96.3%-95% CI, 87%-100%). 52 oral lesions did not reveal any histopathologic evidence of dysplasia or carcinoma and of these, brush biopsy reported 47 as "negative" and 5 as "atypical"(specificity of "positive" brush biopsy result is 100%- 95% CI, 93%-100%; specificity for "atypical" brush biopsy result is 90.4%-95% CI, 82%-97%. The positive predictive value of an abnormal oral brush biopsy was 84% and the negative predictive value was 98%.

Conclusion: Our study demonstrated that the oral brush biopsy is an accurate test in identifying oral premalignant and malignant lesions, even if minimally suspicious.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

口腔刷活检与计算机辅助分析识别癌前病变和癌性病变的疗效。
背景:口腔癌是世界范围内报告的第六大最常见的恶性肿瘤,也是所有恶性肿瘤中死亡率最高的一种。目前缺乏可靠的诊断方法来检测早期恶性肿瘤。本研究的目的是评估毛刷活检鉴别口腔癌前病变和恶性病变的敏感性和特异性。方法:对85例经临床检查认为有轻微可疑口腔病变的患者进行口腔刷刀活检,并对结果进行比较。结果:在79例患者中,有足够的刷活检样本和匹配的刀活检,27例显示组织病理学证据为不典型增生或癌,其中26例通过口腔刷活检独立鉴定(灵敏度:96.3%-95% CI, 87%-100%)。52例口腔病变未发现任何组织病理学证据显示发育不良或癌,其中,47例刷活检报告为“阴性”,5例为“非典型”(“阳性”刷活检结果特异性为100%- 95% CI, 93%-100%;“非典型”刷活检结果的特异性为90.4%-95% CI, 82%-97%。异常口腔刷活检阳性预测值为84%,阴性预测值为98%。结论:我们的研究表明,口腔刷活检是一种准确的检测口腔癌前病变和恶性病变的方法,即使有轻微的可疑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信