Resolution of organ functional scores to predict the outcome in adult acute respiratory distress syndrome patients receiving high-frequency oscillatory ventilation.

Kuo-Chin Kao, Cheng-Ta Yang, Han-Chung Hu, Hui-Ching Ting, Ching-Tzu Huang, Lan-Ti Chou, Hsiu-Feng Hsiao, Li-Fu Li, Ying-Huang Tsai, Chung-Chi Huang
{"title":"Resolution of organ functional scores to predict the outcome in adult acute respiratory distress syndrome patients receiving high-frequency oscillatory ventilation.","authors":"Kuo-Chin Kao,&nbsp;Cheng-Ta Yang,&nbsp;Han-Chung Hu,&nbsp;Hui-Ching Ting,&nbsp;Ching-Tzu Huang,&nbsp;Lan-Ti Chou,&nbsp;Hsiu-Feng Hsiao,&nbsp;Li-Fu Li,&nbsp;Ying-Huang Tsai,&nbsp;Chung-Chi Huang","doi":"10.1097/TA.0b013e3182332102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>High-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) may be used as a rescue therapy for adults with acute respiratory distress syndrome who have failed conventional ventilation (CV). We undertook a prospective study to investigate the determinants of mortality and the sequential evolution of organ failures in HFOV-treated adult acute respiratory distress syndrome patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The indication for HFOV was severe oxygenation failure (PaO2/FiO2 <120 mm Hg) while receiving aggressive CV support (defined by either PaO2 ≤65 mm Hg with FiO2 ≥0.6 when positive end-expiratory pressures >10 cmH2O or plateau airway pressure ≥35 cm H2O). Demographic, clinical, and physiologic data were collected prospectively (May 2007-July 2009). Organ System Failure (OSF), Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA), and Multiple Organ Dysfunction (MOD) scores were recorded during and after HFOV application. Additional outcome measures included HFOV successful weaning rate, cause of failure, complications, survival rate, and cause of death.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The intensive care unit mortality rate was 62% (21 of 34). Survivors had a significantly shorter CV time before HFOV than nonsurvivors (32.8 hours ± 16.7 hours vs. 47.9 hours ± 26.2 hours, p = 0.049). Survivors had significantly lower baseline lung injury scores, OSF, SOFA, and MOD scores than nonsurvivors. After HFOV, the OSF, SOFA, and MOD scores were significantly decreased for survivors, particularly from day 3 onward.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Survivors had early improvements in OSF scores after HFOV application. Organ failure system scoring may be used for deciding on HFOV initiation and for evaluating the effects of HFOV.</p>","PeriodicalId":48894,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Trauma-Injury Infection and Critical Care","volume":"71 6","pages":"1536-42"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/TA.0b013e3182332102","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Trauma-Injury Infection and Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e3182332102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Background: High-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) may be used as a rescue therapy for adults with acute respiratory distress syndrome who have failed conventional ventilation (CV). We undertook a prospective study to investigate the determinants of mortality and the sequential evolution of organ failures in HFOV-treated adult acute respiratory distress syndrome patients.

Methods: The indication for HFOV was severe oxygenation failure (PaO2/FiO2 <120 mm Hg) while receiving aggressive CV support (defined by either PaO2 ≤65 mm Hg with FiO2 ≥0.6 when positive end-expiratory pressures >10 cmH2O or plateau airway pressure ≥35 cm H2O). Demographic, clinical, and physiologic data were collected prospectively (May 2007-July 2009). Organ System Failure (OSF), Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA), and Multiple Organ Dysfunction (MOD) scores were recorded during and after HFOV application. Additional outcome measures included HFOV successful weaning rate, cause of failure, complications, survival rate, and cause of death.

Results: The intensive care unit mortality rate was 62% (21 of 34). Survivors had a significantly shorter CV time before HFOV than nonsurvivors (32.8 hours ± 16.7 hours vs. 47.9 hours ± 26.2 hours, p = 0.049). Survivors had significantly lower baseline lung injury scores, OSF, SOFA, and MOD scores than nonsurvivors. After HFOV, the OSF, SOFA, and MOD scores were significantly decreased for survivors, particularly from day 3 onward.

Conclusions: Survivors had early improvements in OSF scores after HFOV application. Organ failure system scoring may be used for deciding on HFOV initiation and for evaluating the effects of HFOV.

通过器官功能评分预测接受高频振荡通气的成人急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者的预后。
背景:高频振荡通气(HFOV)可作为常规通气(CV)失败的急性呼吸窘迫综合征成人患者的抢救治疗方法。我们进行了一项前瞻性研究,以调查hfov治疗的成人急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者死亡的决定因素和器官衰竭的顺序演变。方法:HFOV的指征为严重氧合衰竭(PaO2/FiO2 10 cmH2O或平台气道压≥35 cmH2O)。前瞻性地收集了人口统计学、临床和生理学数据(2007年5月- 2009年7月)。在HFOV应用期间和之后分别记录器官系统衰竭(OSF)、顺序器官衰竭评估(SOFA)和多器官功能障碍(MOD)评分。其他结果测量包括HFOV成功脱机率、失败原因、并发症、存活率和死亡原因。结果:重症监护病房死亡率为62%(21 / 34)。幸存者发生HFOV前CV时间明显短于非幸存者(32.8小时±16.7小时vs 47.9小时±26.2小时,p = 0.049)。幸存者的基线肺损伤评分、OSF、SOFA和MOD评分明显低于非幸存者。在HFOV后,幸存者的OSF、SOFA和MOD评分显著下降,特别是从第3天开始。结论:幸存者在应用HFOV后OSF评分有早期改善。器官衰竭系统评分可用于决定HFOV的起始和评价HFOV的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Trauma-Injury Infection and Critical Care
Journal of Trauma-Injury Infection and Critical Care CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-EMERGENCY MEDICINE
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3 months
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信