A mandibular advancement appliance reduces pain and rhythmic masticatory muscle activity in patients with morning headache.

Journal of orofacial pain Pub Date : 2011-01-01
Laurent Franco, Pierre H Rompre, Pierre de Grandmont, Susumu Abe, Gilles J Lavigne
{"title":"A mandibular advancement appliance reduces pain and rhythmic masticatory muscle activity in patients with morning headache.","authors":"Laurent Franco,&nbsp;Pierre H Rompre,&nbsp;Pierre de Grandmont,&nbsp;Susumu Abe,&nbsp;Gilles J Lavigne","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To evaluate the influence of an oral appliance on morning headache and orofacial pain in subjects without reported sleep-disordered breathing (SDB).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twelve subjects aged 27.6 ± 2.1 (mean ± SE) years and suffering from frequent morning headache participated in this study. Each subject was individually fitted with a mandibular advancement appliance (MAA). The first two sleep laboratory polygraphic recording (SLPR) nights were for habituation (N1) and baseline (N2). Subjects then slept five nights without the MAA (period 1: P1), followed by eight nights with the MAA in neutral position (P2), ending with SLPR night 3 (N3). Subjects then slept five nights without the MAA (P3), followed by eight nights with the MAA in 50% advanced position (P4), ending with SLPR night 4 (N4). Finally, subjects slept 5 nights without the MAA (P5). Morning headache and orofacial pain intensity were assessed each morning with a 100-mm visual analog scale. Repeated measures ANOVAs and Friedman tests were used to evaluate treatment effects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to the baseline period (P1), the use of an MAA in both neutral and advanced position was associated with a ⋝ 70% reduction in morning headache and ⋝ 42% reduction in orofacial pain intensity (P ⋜ .001). During the washout periods (P3 and P5), morning headache and orofacial pain intensity returned to close to baseline levels. Compared to N2, both MAA positions significantly reduced (P < .05) rhythmic masticatory muscle activity (RMMA).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Short-term use of an MAA is associated with a significant reduction in morning headache and orofacial pain intensity. Part of this reduction may be linked to the concomitant reduction in RMMA.</p>","PeriodicalId":16649,"journal":{"name":"Journal of orofacial pain","volume":"25 3","pages":"240-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of orofacial pain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: To evaluate the influence of an oral appliance on morning headache and orofacial pain in subjects without reported sleep-disordered breathing (SDB).

Methods: Twelve subjects aged 27.6 ± 2.1 (mean ± SE) years and suffering from frequent morning headache participated in this study. Each subject was individually fitted with a mandibular advancement appliance (MAA). The first two sleep laboratory polygraphic recording (SLPR) nights were for habituation (N1) and baseline (N2). Subjects then slept five nights without the MAA (period 1: P1), followed by eight nights with the MAA in neutral position (P2), ending with SLPR night 3 (N3). Subjects then slept five nights without the MAA (P3), followed by eight nights with the MAA in 50% advanced position (P4), ending with SLPR night 4 (N4). Finally, subjects slept 5 nights without the MAA (P5). Morning headache and orofacial pain intensity were assessed each morning with a 100-mm visual analog scale. Repeated measures ANOVAs and Friedman tests were used to evaluate treatment effects.

Results: Compared to the baseline period (P1), the use of an MAA in both neutral and advanced position was associated with a ⋝ 70% reduction in morning headache and ⋝ 42% reduction in orofacial pain intensity (P ⋜ .001). During the washout periods (P3 and P5), morning headache and orofacial pain intensity returned to close to baseline levels. Compared to N2, both MAA positions significantly reduced (P < .05) rhythmic masticatory muscle activity (RMMA).

Conclusion: Short-term use of an MAA is associated with a significant reduction in morning headache and orofacial pain intensity. Part of this reduction may be linked to the concomitant reduction in RMMA.

下颌前移矫治器可减轻早晨头痛患者的疼痛和节律性咀嚼肌活动。
目的:评价一种口腔器械对无睡眠呼吸障碍(SDB)受试者早晨头痛和口面部疼痛的影响。方法:12例年龄27.6±2.1(平均±SE)岁,早晨头痛频繁的患者参加本研究。每个受试者单独安装下颌推进器(MAA)。前两个睡眠实验室测谎记录(SLPR)夜用于习惯化(N1)和基线(N2)。然后受试者睡了5个晚上没有MAA(第1期:P1),接着睡了8个晚上MAA处于中性位置(P2),结束于SLPR第三夜(N3)。然后受试者睡了5个晚上没有MAA (P3),接着睡了8个晚上MAA处于50%的位置(P4),结束于SLPR第4晚(N4)。最后,受试者在没有MAA的情况下睡5个晚上(P5)。每天早晨用100毫米视觉模拟量表评估早晨头痛和口面部疼痛强度。采用重复测量方差分析和Friedman检验评价治疗效果。结果:与基线期(P1)相比,在中位和前位使用MAA与早晨头痛降低⋝70%和口面部疼痛强度降低⋝42%相关(P⋜.001)。在洗脱期(P3和P5),早晨头痛和口面部疼痛强度恢复到接近基线水平。与N2组相比,两种MAA位置均显著降低了咀嚼肌节律性活动(RMMA) (P < 0.05)。结论:短期使用MAA可显著减少早晨头痛和口面部疼痛强度。减少的部分原因可能与相应的RMMA减少有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of orofacial pain
Journal of orofacial pain 医学-牙科与口腔外科
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信