Using Force Sensors and Neural Models to Encode Tactile Stimuli as Spike-based Responses.

Elmer K Kim, Gregory J Gerling, Scott A Wellnitz, Ellen A Lumpkin
{"title":"Using Force Sensors and Neural Models to Encode Tactile Stimuli as Spike-based Responses.","authors":"Elmer K Kim, Gregory J Gerling, Scott A Wellnitz, Ellen A Lumpkin","doi":"10.1109/HAPTIC.2010.5444657","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Tactile sensors will augment the next generation of prosthetic limbs. However, currently available sensors do not produce biologically-compatible output. This work seeks to illustrate that a force sensor combined with a bi-phasic, neural spiking algorithm, or spiking-sensor, can produce spiking patterns similar to that of the slowly adapting type I (SAI) mechanoreceptor. Experiments were conducted where first spike latency and inter-spike interval, in response to a rapidly delivered (100 ms) sustained displacement (1.1, 1.3, 1.5 mm for 5 s), were compared between the spiking-sensor and SAI recording. The results indicated that the predicted spike times were similar, in magnitude and increasing linear trend, to those observed with the SAI. Over the three displacements, average dynamic ISIs were 7.3, 4.2, 3.8 ms for the spiking-sensor and 6.2, 6.9, 4.1 ms for the SAI, while average static ISIs were 69.0, 45.2, 35.1 ms and 159.9, 69.6, 38.8 ms. The predicted first spike latencies (74.3, 73.9, 96.3 ms) lagged in comparison to those observed for the SAI (26.8, 31.7, 28.8 ms), which may be due to both the different applied force ramp-ups and the SAI's exquisite dynamic sensitivity range and rapid response time.</p>","PeriodicalId":89234,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings. Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems","volume":" ","pages":"195-198"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3151443/pdf/nihms-309796.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings. Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/HAPTIC.2010.5444657","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Tactile sensors will augment the next generation of prosthetic limbs. However, currently available sensors do not produce biologically-compatible output. This work seeks to illustrate that a force sensor combined with a bi-phasic, neural spiking algorithm, or spiking-sensor, can produce spiking patterns similar to that of the slowly adapting type I (SAI) mechanoreceptor. Experiments were conducted where first spike latency and inter-spike interval, in response to a rapidly delivered (100 ms) sustained displacement (1.1, 1.3, 1.5 mm for 5 s), were compared between the spiking-sensor and SAI recording. The results indicated that the predicted spike times were similar, in magnitude and increasing linear trend, to those observed with the SAI. Over the three displacements, average dynamic ISIs were 7.3, 4.2, 3.8 ms for the spiking-sensor and 6.2, 6.9, 4.1 ms for the SAI, while average static ISIs were 69.0, 45.2, 35.1 ms and 159.9, 69.6, 38.8 ms. The predicted first spike latencies (74.3, 73.9, 96.3 ms) lagged in comparison to those observed for the SAI (26.8, 31.7, 28.8 ms), which may be due to both the different applied force ramp-ups and the SAI's exquisite dynamic sensitivity range and rapid response time.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

利用力传感器和神经模型将触觉刺激编码为基于尖峰的反应。
触觉传感器将增强下一代假肢。然而,目前可用的传感器不能产生生物相容的输出。这项工作旨在说明与双相神经脉冲算法或脉冲传感器相结合的力传感器可以产生类似于缓慢适应I型(SAI)机械感受器的脉冲模式。实验中,在快速传递(100 ms)持续位移(1.1、1.3、1.5 mm,持续5 s)的情况下,比较了峰值传感器和SAI记录的首峰潜伏期和峰间间隔。结果表明,预测的峰值时间与SAI观测值在大小和增加的线性趋势上相似。在三种位移中,峰值传感器的平均动态ISIs分别为7.3、4.2、3.8 ms, SAI的平均动态ISIs为6.2、6.9、4.1 ms,而平均静态ISIs分别为69.0、45.2、35.1 ms和159.9、69.6、38.8 ms。预测的第一峰延迟(74.3,73.9,96.3 ms)滞后于SAI (26.8, 31.7, 28.8 ms),这可能是由于不同的施加力增量和SAI精细的动态灵敏度范围和快速的响应时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信