Nurses' evaluation of a new formalized triage system in the emergency department - a qualitative study.

Danish medical bulletin Pub Date : 2011-10-01
Mette Brehm Johansen, Jakob Lundager Forberg
{"title":"Nurses' evaluation of a new formalized triage system in the emergency department - a qualitative study.","authors":"Mette Brehm Johansen,&nbsp;Jakob Lundager Forberg","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Formalized triage in the emergency department (ED) is not widely used in Denmark; this study explores the effects of introducing a five-level process triage system in a Danish ED.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with 15 emergency nurses. The interviews were preceded by observations of the work of the ED nurses in which focus was on the triage process.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Formalized triage was experienced to improve the overview of patients and resources at the ED, and the nurses described that they felt more assured when prioritizing between patients. Communication and coordination were also improved by the triage system. But more time spent on documentation and reevaluation may cause the nurses to feel professionally inadequate if adequate resources are not provided. Furthermore, the triage system has reduced the focus on the humanistic and psychosocial aspects of nursing. Difficulties were occasionally experienced when categorizing patients with diffuse symptoms according to the standardized triage symptoms and signs' algorithms.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Introducing a formalized triage system in the ED was experienced to give a better overview and more overall control of ED patients. Adequate resources are needed to ensure that a stronger focus on documentation and re-evaluation related to triage does not produce a feeling of professional inadequacy among the staff.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>not relevant.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>not relevant.</p>","PeriodicalId":11019,"journal":{"name":"Danish medical bulletin","volume":"58 10","pages":"A4311"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Danish medical bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Formalized triage in the emergency department (ED) is not widely used in Denmark; this study explores the effects of introducing a five-level process triage system in a Danish ED.

Material and methods: Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with 15 emergency nurses. The interviews were preceded by observations of the work of the ED nurses in which focus was on the triage process.

Results: Formalized triage was experienced to improve the overview of patients and resources at the ED, and the nurses described that they felt more assured when prioritizing between patients. Communication and coordination were also improved by the triage system. But more time spent on documentation and reevaluation may cause the nurses to feel professionally inadequate if adequate resources are not provided. Furthermore, the triage system has reduced the focus on the humanistic and psychosocial aspects of nursing. Difficulties were occasionally experienced when categorizing patients with diffuse symptoms according to the standardized triage symptoms and signs' algorithms.

Conclusion: Introducing a formalized triage system in the ED was experienced to give a better overview and more overall control of ED patients. Adequate resources are needed to ensure that a stronger focus on documentation and re-evaluation related to triage does not produce a feeling of professional inadequacy among the staff.

Funding: not relevant.

Trial registration: not relevant.

急诊科护士对一种新的正式分诊系统的评价——一项定性研究。
简介:在丹麦,急诊科(ED)的正式分类并没有被广泛使用;本研究探讨了在丹麦急诊室引入五级流程分诊系统的效果。材料和方法:对15名急诊护士进行半结构化定性访谈。访谈之前观察了急诊科护士的工作,重点是分诊过程。结果:正式的分诊可以改善对急诊科患者和资源的总体了解,护士们表示,在对患者进行优先排序时,他们感到更放心。分诊系统也改善了沟通和协调。但是,如果没有提供足够的资源,在文件和重新评估上花费更多的时间可能会导致护士感到专业不足。此外,分诊系统减少了对护理的人文和社会心理方面的关注。根据标准化的分诊症状和体征算法对弥漫性症状患者进行分类时,有时会遇到困难。结论:在急诊科引入正式的分诊系统可以更好地概述和全面控制急诊科患者。需要有足够的资源,以确保更加注重与分流有关的文件和重新评价,不会使工作人员产生专业能力不足的感觉。资金:不相关。试验注册:不相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Danish medical bulletin
Danish medical bulletin 医学-医学:内科
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信