Prenatal screening for and diagnosis of aneuploidy in twin pregnancies.

François Audibert, Alain Gagnon
{"title":"Prenatal screening for and diagnosis of aneuploidy in twin pregnancies.","authors":"François Audibert,&nbsp;Alain Gagnon","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To provide a Canadian consensus document with recommendations on prenatal screening for and diagnosis of fetal aneuploidy (e.g., Down syndrome and trisomy 18) in twin pregnancies.</p><p><strong>Options: </strong>The process of prenatal screening and diagnosis in twin pregnancies is complex. This document reviews the options available to pregnant women and the challenges specific to screening and diagnosis in a twin pregnancy.</p><p><strong>Outcomes: </strong>Clinicians will be better informed about the accuracy of different screening options in twin pregnancies and about techniques of invasive prenatal diagnosis in twins.</p><p><strong>Evidence: </strong>PubMed and Cochrane Database were searched for relevant English and French language articles published between 1985 and 2010, using appropriate controlled vocabulary and key words (aneuploidy, Down syndrome, trisomy, prenatal screening, genetic health risk, genetic health surveillance, prenatal diagnosis, twin gestation). Results were restricted to systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials, and relevant observational studies. Searches were updated on a regular basis and incorporated in the guideline to August 2010. Grey (unpublished) literature was identified through searching the websites of health technology assessment and health technology assessment-related agencies, clinical practice guideline collections, clinical trial registries, and national and international medical specialty societies. The previous Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada guidelines regarding prenatal screening were also reviewed in developing this clinical practice guideline.</p><p><strong>Values: </strong>The quality of evidence was rated using the criteria described in the Report of the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care (Table 1).</p><p><strong>Benefits, harms, and costs: </strong>There is a need for specific guidelines for prenatal screening and diagnosis in twins. These guidelines should assist health care providers in the approach to this aspect of prenatal care of women with twin pregnancies. SUMMARY STATEMENTS 1. Fetal nuchal translucency combined with maternal age is an acceptable first trimester screening test for aneuploidies in twin pregnancies. (II-2) 2. First trimester serum screening combined with nuchal translucency may be considered in twin pregnancies. It provides some improvement over the performance of screening by nuchal translucency and maternal age by decreasing the false-positive rate. (II-3) 3. Integrated screening with nuchal translucency plus first and second trimester serum screening is an option in twin pregnancies. Further prospective studies are required in this area, since it has not been validated in prospective studies in twins. (III) 4. Non-directive counselling is essential when invasive testing is offered. (III) 5. When chorionic villus sampling is performed in non-monochorionic multiple pregnancies, a combination of transabdominal and transcervical approaches or a transabdominal only approach appears to provide the best results to minimize the likelihood of sampling errors. (II-2) Recommendations 1. All pregnant women in Canada, regardless of age, should be offered, through an informed counselling process, the option of a prenatal screening test for the most common clinically significant fetal aneuploidies. In addition, they should be offered a second trimester ultrasound for dating, assessment of fetal anatomy, and detection of multiples. (I-A) 2. Counselling must be non-directive and must respect a woman's right to accept or decline any or all of the testing or options offered at any point in the process. (III-A) 3. When non-invasive prenatal screening for aneuploidy is available, maternal age alone should not be an indication for invasive prenatal diagnosis in a twin pregnancy. (II-2A) If non-invasive prenatal screening is not available, invasive prenatal diagnosis in twins should be offered to women aged 35 and over. (II-2B) 4. Chorionicity has a major impact on the prenatal screening process and should be determined by ultrasound in the first trimester of all twin pregnancies. (II-2A) 5. When screening is done by nuchal translucency and maternal age, a pregnancy-specific risk should be calculated in monochorionic twins. In dichorionic twins, a fetus-specific risk should be calculated. (II-3C) 6. During amniocentesis, both amniotic sacs should be sampled in monochorionic twin pregnancies, unless monochorionicity is confirmed before 14 weeks and the fetuses appear concordant for growth and anatomy. (II-2B) 7. Prior to invasive testing or in the context of twins discordant for an abnormality, selective reduction should be discussed and made available to those requesting the procedure after appropriate counselling. (III-B) 8. Monitoring for disseminated intravascular coagulopathy is not indicated in dichorionic twin pregnancies undergoing selective reduction. (II-2B).</p>","PeriodicalId":520287,"journal":{"name":"Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada : JOGC = Journal d'obstetrique et gynecologie du Canada : JOGC","volume":" ","pages":"754-67"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada : JOGC = Journal d'obstetrique et gynecologie du Canada : JOGC","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To provide a Canadian consensus document with recommendations on prenatal screening for and diagnosis of fetal aneuploidy (e.g., Down syndrome and trisomy 18) in twin pregnancies.

Options: The process of prenatal screening and diagnosis in twin pregnancies is complex. This document reviews the options available to pregnant women and the challenges specific to screening and diagnosis in a twin pregnancy.

Outcomes: Clinicians will be better informed about the accuracy of different screening options in twin pregnancies and about techniques of invasive prenatal diagnosis in twins.

Evidence: PubMed and Cochrane Database were searched for relevant English and French language articles published between 1985 and 2010, using appropriate controlled vocabulary and key words (aneuploidy, Down syndrome, trisomy, prenatal screening, genetic health risk, genetic health surveillance, prenatal diagnosis, twin gestation). Results were restricted to systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials, and relevant observational studies. Searches were updated on a regular basis and incorporated in the guideline to August 2010. Grey (unpublished) literature was identified through searching the websites of health technology assessment and health technology assessment-related agencies, clinical practice guideline collections, clinical trial registries, and national and international medical specialty societies. The previous Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada guidelines regarding prenatal screening were also reviewed in developing this clinical practice guideline.

Values: The quality of evidence was rated using the criteria described in the Report of the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care (Table 1).

Benefits, harms, and costs: There is a need for specific guidelines for prenatal screening and diagnosis in twins. These guidelines should assist health care providers in the approach to this aspect of prenatal care of women with twin pregnancies. SUMMARY STATEMENTS 1. Fetal nuchal translucency combined with maternal age is an acceptable first trimester screening test for aneuploidies in twin pregnancies. (II-2) 2. First trimester serum screening combined with nuchal translucency may be considered in twin pregnancies. It provides some improvement over the performance of screening by nuchal translucency and maternal age by decreasing the false-positive rate. (II-3) 3. Integrated screening with nuchal translucency plus first and second trimester serum screening is an option in twin pregnancies. Further prospective studies are required in this area, since it has not been validated in prospective studies in twins. (III) 4. Non-directive counselling is essential when invasive testing is offered. (III) 5. When chorionic villus sampling is performed in non-monochorionic multiple pregnancies, a combination of transabdominal and transcervical approaches or a transabdominal only approach appears to provide the best results to minimize the likelihood of sampling errors. (II-2) Recommendations 1. All pregnant women in Canada, regardless of age, should be offered, through an informed counselling process, the option of a prenatal screening test for the most common clinically significant fetal aneuploidies. In addition, they should be offered a second trimester ultrasound for dating, assessment of fetal anatomy, and detection of multiples. (I-A) 2. Counselling must be non-directive and must respect a woman's right to accept or decline any or all of the testing or options offered at any point in the process. (III-A) 3. When non-invasive prenatal screening for aneuploidy is available, maternal age alone should not be an indication for invasive prenatal diagnosis in a twin pregnancy. (II-2A) If non-invasive prenatal screening is not available, invasive prenatal diagnosis in twins should be offered to women aged 35 and over. (II-2B) 4. Chorionicity has a major impact on the prenatal screening process and should be determined by ultrasound in the first trimester of all twin pregnancies. (II-2A) 5. When screening is done by nuchal translucency and maternal age, a pregnancy-specific risk should be calculated in monochorionic twins. In dichorionic twins, a fetus-specific risk should be calculated. (II-3C) 6. During amniocentesis, both amniotic sacs should be sampled in monochorionic twin pregnancies, unless monochorionicity is confirmed before 14 weeks and the fetuses appear concordant for growth and anatomy. (II-2B) 7. Prior to invasive testing or in the context of twins discordant for an abnormality, selective reduction should be discussed and made available to those requesting the procedure after appropriate counselling. (III-B) 8. Monitoring for disseminated intravascular coagulopathy is not indicated in dichorionic twin pregnancies undergoing selective reduction. (II-2B).

双胎妊娠非整倍体的产前筛查和诊断。
目的:为双胎妊娠胎儿非整倍体(如唐氏综合征和18三体)的产前筛查和诊断提供一份加拿大共识文件。选择:双胎妊娠的产前筛查和诊断过程是复杂的。本文件回顾了孕妇可用的选择以及双胎妊娠筛查和诊断的具体挑战。结果:临床医生将更好地了解双胞胎妊娠中不同筛查选择的准确性,以及双胞胎侵入性产前诊断技术。证据:检索PubMed和Cochrane数据库中1985年至2010年间发表的相关英文和法文文章,使用适当的控制词汇和关键词(非整倍体、唐氏综合征、三体、产前筛查、遗传健康风险、遗传健康监测、产前诊断、双胎妊娠)。结果仅限于系统评价、随机对照试验和相关观察性研究。搜索结果定期更新,并纳入指南,直至2010年8月。灰色(未发表)文献通过检索卫生技术评价和卫生技术评价相关机构网站、临床实践指南收集、临床试验注册、国家和国际医学专业学会。在制定本临床实践指南时,还审查了以前加拿大妇产科医师协会关于产前筛查的指南。价值:根据加拿大预防保健工作组报告中描述的标准对证据质量进行评级(表1)。益处、危害和成本:需要针对双胞胎的产前筛查和诊断制定具体的指导方针。这些指南应有助于保健提供者对双胎妊娠妇女进行这方面的产前护理。1.总结陈述胎儿颈部透明度与母亲年龄相结合,是双胎妊娠非整倍体的可接受的妊娠早期筛查试验。(II-2) 2。双胎妊娠可考虑孕早期血清筛查联合颈部透光检查。通过降低假阳性率,它提供了一些优于颈部半透明和产妇年龄筛查的性能。(II-3) 3。综合筛查与颈部半透明加上前和中期妊娠血清筛查是双胎妊娠的一种选择。这一领域还需要进一步的前瞻性研究,因为它尚未在双胞胎的前瞻性研究中得到验证。(3) 4。当提供侵入性检测时,非指导性咨询是必不可少的。(3) 5。当对非单绒毛膜多胎妊娠进行绒毛膜绒毛取样时,经腹和经宫颈联合入路或仅经腹入路似乎可以提供最佳结果,以尽量减少取样误差的可能性。(二)建议在加拿大,所有孕妇,无论年龄大小,都应该通过知情的咨询过程,对最常见的临床显著胎儿非整倍体进行产前筛查测试。此外,他们应该提供孕中期超声,以确定日期,评估胎儿解剖结构,并检测多胎。(我)2。咨询必须是非指导性的,必须尊重妇女接受或拒绝过程中任何时候提供的任何或所有检测或选择的权利。(III-A) 3。当非整倍体的非侵入性产前筛查是可用的,母亲的年龄单独不应该是有创产前诊断双胎妊娠的指征。(II-2A)如果没有无创产前筛查,则应向35岁及以上的妇女提供双胞胎的有创产前诊断。(II-2B) 4。绒毛膜性对产前筛查过程有重大影响,应在所有双胎妊娠的前三个月通过超声确定。(II-2A) 5。当通过颈部透明度和母亲年龄进行筛查时,应计算单绒毛膜双胞胎的妊娠特异性风险。在双绒毛膜双胞胎中,应计算胎儿特有的风险。(II-3C) 6。在羊膜穿刺术中,单绒毛膜双胎妊娠的两个羊膜囊都应取样,除非在14周之前确认单绒毛膜性,并且胎儿在生长和解剖上表现一致。(II-2B) 7。在侵入性检查之前,或在双胞胎异常不一致的情况下,应该讨论选择性复位,并在适当的咨询后提供给那些要求手术的人。(III-B) 8。监测弥散性血管内凝血功能障碍不适合双绒毛膜双胎妊娠选择性复位。(II-2B)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信