Many unexpected abdominal findings on staging computed tomography in patients with colorectal cancer.

Danish medical bulletin Pub Date : 2011-09-01
Kim Holmsted, Keld Nørring, Lene Collatz Laustrup, Per Jess
{"title":"Many unexpected abdominal findings on staging computed tomography in patients with colorectal cancer.","authors":"Kim Holmsted,&nbsp;Keld Nørring,&nbsp;Lene Collatz Laustrup,&nbsp;Per Jess","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Computed tomography (CT) was proven to be superior to preoperative abdominal ultrasound in the preoperative setting for detection of hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer (CRC). The higher sensitivity of CT has resulted in a number of unexpected abdominal findings of varying importance; an issue that was previously studied in relation to CT colonography, but not in relation to staging CT with intravenous contrast in CRC patients. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the number and significance of such unexpected findings on staging CTs in CRC patients.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The study comprises a retrospective analysis of 247 consecutive patients who underwent colorectal cancer surgery at Roskilde Hospital, Denmark, in 2009. A preoperative abdominal staging CT was performed in 245 of these patients. All CT scans and patient records were reviewed by the authors. The unexpected CT findings were classified as being of high, moderate or low clinical importance according to whether they required treatment relatively promptly, later or did not require treatment at all, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 114 patients (47%) had unexpected findings. Nineteen of the 137 findings (14%) or 8% in all patients were considered to be of high importance. Three per cent of all patients had abdominal aortic aneurysms, 2% had CRC metastases to the adrenal glands, 2% primary kidney tumours and 1% gynaecologic tumours. Twenty per cent of the patients had findings of moderate importance and 29% findings of low importance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Staging CT in CRC patients showed nearly 8% of unexpected abdominal findings of high clinical importance requiring relatively prompt treatment.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>not relevant.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>not relevant.</p>","PeriodicalId":11019,"journal":{"name":"Danish medical bulletin","volume":"58 9","pages":"A4308"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Danish medical bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Computed tomography (CT) was proven to be superior to preoperative abdominal ultrasound in the preoperative setting for detection of hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer (CRC). The higher sensitivity of CT has resulted in a number of unexpected abdominal findings of varying importance; an issue that was previously studied in relation to CT colonography, but not in relation to staging CT with intravenous contrast in CRC patients. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the number and significance of such unexpected findings on staging CTs in CRC patients.

Material and methods: The study comprises a retrospective analysis of 247 consecutive patients who underwent colorectal cancer surgery at Roskilde Hospital, Denmark, in 2009. A preoperative abdominal staging CT was performed in 245 of these patients. All CT scans and patient records were reviewed by the authors. The unexpected CT findings were classified as being of high, moderate or low clinical importance according to whether they required treatment relatively promptly, later or did not require treatment at all, respectively.

Results: Overall, 114 patients (47%) had unexpected findings. Nineteen of the 137 findings (14%) or 8% in all patients were considered to be of high importance. Three per cent of all patients had abdominal aortic aneurysms, 2% had CRC metastases to the adrenal glands, 2% primary kidney tumours and 1% gynaecologic tumours. Twenty per cent of the patients had findings of moderate importance and 29% findings of low importance.

Conclusion: Staging CT in CRC patients showed nearly 8% of unexpected abdominal findings of high clinical importance requiring relatively prompt treatment.

Funding: not relevant.

Trial registration: not relevant.

许多意想不到的腹部发现分期计算机断层扫描结肠直肠癌患者。
简介:计算机断层扫描(CT)被证明在术前检查结肠直肠癌(CRC)肝转移方面优于术前腹部超声。CT的高灵敏度导致了许多意想不到的腹部发现,其重要性各不相同;这是一个先前与CT结肠镜检查有关的问题,但与CRC患者的CT静脉造影剂分期无关。本研究的目的是评估此类意外发现对CRC患者ct分期的数量和意义。材料和方法:该研究包括对2009年在丹麦罗斯基勒医院连续接受结直肠癌手术的247例患者的回顾性分析。其中245例患者行术前腹部分期CT检查。所有CT扫描和患者记录均由作者审阅。根据是否需要相对及时、较晚或根本不需要治疗,将意外的CT表现分为临床重要性高、中等或低。结果:总体而言,114例(47%)患者出现意外发现。137个发现中有19个(14%)或8%的患者被认为是高度重要的。所有患者中有3%患有腹主动脉瘤,2%患有转移至肾上腺的结直肠癌,2%为原发性肾脏肿瘤,1%为妇科肿瘤。20%的患者有中等重要性的发现,29%的患者有低重要性的发现。结论:CRC患者的分期CT显示近8%的腹部意外表现具有较高的临床重要性,需要相对及时的治疗。资金:不相关。试验注册:不相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Danish medical bulletin
Danish medical bulletin 医学-医学:内科
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信