Gender bias in specialty preferences among Danish medical students: a cross-sectional study.

Danish medical bulletin Pub Date : 2011-09-01
Laura Toftegaard Pedersen, Nanna Hasle Bak, Agnete Skovlund Dissing, Birgit H Petersson
{"title":"Gender bias in specialty preferences among Danish medical students: a cross-sectional study.","authors":"Laura Toftegaard Pedersen,&nbsp;Nanna Hasle Bak,&nbsp;Agnete Skovlund Dissing,&nbsp;Birgit H Petersson","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Female medical students tend to prefer person-oriented specialties characterized by close doctor-patient contact and aspects of care. Conversely, male medical students tend to seek towards specialties with elements of autonomy, technology and \"action\" . Furthermore, female doctors will outnumber male doctors in Denmark by 2017 and this may have implications for the availability of specialized doctors.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Data derives from a baseline questionnaire pertaining to a Danish follow-up study. A total of 561 first year medical students enrolled in 2006 and 2007 answered the questionnaire. Binary logistic regression analysis was used to calculate odds ratio estimates of the relationship between gender and specialty preference. Variables measuring self-image were included in the analysis as potential mediators.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>47% female and 19% male students pursued personoriented specialties and 46% female and 68% male students pursued technique-oriented specialties. More female students pursued technique-oriented specialties than in 1992. Female students have 69% less probability of choosing a technique-oriented specialty than males. This association is mediated by lack of self-confidence.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>If specialty preferences are persistent during medical school, the results suggest that we will face more difficulties recruiting males to person-oriented specialties than females to technique-oriented specialties in the future. Furthermore, when addressing students' specialty preferences, we should consider both self confidence and gender.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>not relevant.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>not relevant.</p>","PeriodicalId":11019,"journal":{"name":"Danish medical bulletin","volume":"58 9","pages":"A4304"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Danish medical bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Female medical students tend to prefer person-oriented specialties characterized by close doctor-patient contact and aspects of care. Conversely, male medical students tend to seek towards specialties with elements of autonomy, technology and "action" . Furthermore, female doctors will outnumber male doctors in Denmark by 2017 and this may have implications for the availability of specialized doctors.

Material and methods: Data derives from a baseline questionnaire pertaining to a Danish follow-up study. A total of 561 first year medical students enrolled in 2006 and 2007 answered the questionnaire. Binary logistic regression analysis was used to calculate odds ratio estimates of the relationship between gender and specialty preference. Variables measuring self-image were included in the analysis as potential mediators.

Results: 47% female and 19% male students pursued personoriented specialties and 46% female and 68% male students pursued technique-oriented specialties. More female students pursued technique-oriented specialties than in 1992. Female students have 69% less probability of choosing a technique-oriented specialty than males. This association is mediated by lack of self-confidence.

Conclusion: If specialty preferences are persistent during medical school, the results suggest that we will face more difficulties recruiting males to person-oriented specialties than females to technique-oriented specialties in the future. Furthermore, when addressing students' specialty preferences, we should consider both self confidence and gender.

Funding: not relevant.

Trial registration: not relevant.

丹麦医科学生专业偏好中的性别偏见:一项横断面研究。
导读:女医学生倾向于以人为本的专业,其特点是医患接触密切,护理方面。相反,男医学生倾向于寻求具有自主性、技术和“行动”元素的专业。此外,到2017年,丹麦女医生的数量将超过男医生,这可能会对专业医生的可用性产生影响。材料和方法:数据来源于丹麦随访研究的基线问卷。共有561名2006年和2007年入学的一年级医学生回答了问卷。采用二元logistic回归分析计算性别与专业偏好关系的比值比。测量自我形象的变量被纳入分析作为潜在的中介。结果:47%的女生和19%的男生选择了个人导向型专业,46%的女生和68%的男生选择了技术导向型专业。与1992年相比,更多的女学生选择了技术型专业。女生选择技术型专业的概率比男生低69%。这种联系是由缺乏自信介导的。结论:如果医学院的专业偏好持续下去,结果表明,未来我们将在以人为本的专业招聘男性比在以技术为本的专业招聘女性面临更多的困难。此外,在解决学生的专业偏好时,我们应该同时考虑自信和性别。资金:不相关。试验注册:不相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Danish medical bulletin
Danish medical bulletin 医学-医学:内科
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信