Confirmatory factor analysis of brief pain inventory (BPI) functional interference clusters in patients with bone metastases.

Q3 Medicine
Journal of Pain Management Pub Date : 2010-01-01
Edward Chow, Jennifer James, Andrea Barsevick, William Hartsell, Sarah Ratcliffe, Charles Scarantino, Robert Ivker, John Suh, Ivy Petersen, Andre Konski, William Demas, Deborah Bruner
{"title":"Confirmatory factor analysis of brief pain inventory (BPI) functional interference clusters in patients with bone metastases.","authors":"Edward Chow,&nbsp;Jennifer James,&nbsp;Andrea Barsevick,&nbsp;William Hartsell,&nbsp;Sarah Ratcliffe,&nbsp;Charles Scarantino,&nbsp;Robert Ivker,&nbsp;John Suh,&nbsp;Ivy Petersen,&nbsp;Andre Konski,&nbsp;William Demas,&nbsp;Deborah Bruner","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To determine which of the previously proposed functional interference cluster models is most appropriate in patients with bone metastases and to determine if the cluster structures identified at baseline differed between responders and non-responders following palliative radiotherapy. METHODS: The confirmatory test data set consists of breast and prostate cancer patients treated with palliative radiotherapy between May 2003 to January 2007. Worst pain and functional interference scores were assessed using Brief Pain Inventory at baseline, 4, 8 and 12 weeks post radiation treatment. The baseline cluster structure of the confirmatory dataset was compared to each of the previously proposed baseline cluster models. Maximum likelihood CFA was used to account for possible correlation amongst the factor components. A MIMIC model was used to determine the invariance of the cluster models between responders and non-responders during follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 169 eligible patients were analysed. There were 91 male and 78 female patients with a median age of 68 years. The median KPS was 70. A single 8 Gy and 20 Gy in 5 fractions were used in 97% of all analysed patients. The RTOG model, in which relationships with others and sleep comprised the mood-related interference cluster and walking ability and normal work comprised the physical-interference cluster, provides the best fit for the sample data. The follow-up cluster structure is not similar across the responder groups indicating that cluster structures shift following radiation treatment, as evidenced by pain response. CONCLUSION: Although differing slightly this analysis confirms pretreatment symptom clusters exist for patients with bone metastases from breast or prostate cancer based on the RTOG 9714 data. This could help formulate symptom management interventions at initial diagnosis. Symptom clusters dissolve or change after treatment which may be a function of the treatment or population and requires further study.</p>","PeriodicalId":39102,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain Management","volume":"3 3","pages":"247-253"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3113524/pdf/nihms153539.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pain Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To determine which of the previously proposed functional interference cluster models is most appropriate in patients with bone metastases and to determine if the cluster structures identified at baseline differed between responders and non-responders following palliative radiotherapy. METHODS: The confirmatory test data set consists of breast and prostate cancer patients treated with palliative radiotherapy between May 2003 to January 2007. Worst pain and functional interference scores were assessed using Brief Pain Inventory at baseline, 4, 8 and 12 weeks post radiation treatment. The baseline cluster structure of the confirmatory dataset was compared to each of the previously proposed baseline cluster models. Maximum likelihood CFA was used to account for possible correlation amongst the factor components. A MIMIC model was used to determine the invariance of the cluster models between responders and non-responders during follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 169 eligible patients were analysed. There were 91 male and 78 female patients with a median age of 68 years. The median KPS was 70. A single 8 Gy and 20 Gy in 5 fractions were used in 97% of all analysed patients. The RTOG model, in which relationships with others and sleep comprised the mood-related interference cluster and walking ability and normal work comprised the physical-interference cluster, provides the best fit for the sample data. The follow-up cluster structure is not similar across the responder groups indicating that cluster structures shift following radiation treatment, as evidenced by pain response. CONCLUSION: Although differing slightly this analysis confirms pretreatment symptom clusters exist for patients with bone metastases from breast or prostate cancer based on the RTOG 9714 data. This could help formulate symptom management interventions at initial diagnosis. Symptom clusters dissolve or change after treatment which may be a function of the treatment or population and requires further study.

骨转移患者短暂疼痛量表(BPI)功能干扰簇的验证性因素分析。
确定先前提出的哪种功能干扰簇模型最适合骨转移患者,并确定基线时识别的簇结构在姑息性放疗后的应答者和无应答者之间是否存在差异。方法:验证性试验数据集包括2003年5月至2007年1月期间接受姑息性放疗的乳腺癌和前列腺癌患者。在放射治疗后的基线、4周、8周和12周,使用简短疼痛量表评估最严重疼痛和功能干扰评分。验证性数据集的基线聚类结构与之前提出的每个基线聚类模型进行了比较。使用最大似然CFA来解释因素组成之间可能的相关性。在随访期间,使用MIMIC模型来确定响应者和非响应者之间的集群模型的不变性。结果:共分析了169例符合条件的患者。男性91例,女性78例,中位年龄68岁。KPS中位数为70。在所有分析的患者中,97%的患者使用单个8 Gy和20 Gy的5个部分。RTOG模型提供了最佳的拟合样本数据,其中与他人和睡眠的关系由情绪相关干扰簇组成,行走能力和正常工作由身体干扰簇组成。随访的簇结构在反应组之间不相似,表明簇结构在放射治疗后发生了变化,正如疼痛反应所证明的那样。结论:根据RTOG 9714数据,虽然略有不同,但该分析证实了乳腺癌或前列腺癌骨转移患者存在预处理症状集群。这有助于在初步诊断时制定症状管理干预措施。症状群在治疗后消失或改变,这可能是治疗或人群的功能,需要进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Pain Management
Journal of Pain Management Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信