Safety risks of cryptic reading frames and gene disruption due to crop transgenesis: what are the odds?

GM crops Pub Date : 2011-01-01 DOI:10.4161/gmcr.2.1.15622
Rod A Herman, Ping Song, Meibao Zhuang
{"title":"Safety risks of cryptic reading frames and gene disruption due to crop transgenesis: what are the odds?","authors":"Rod A Herman, Ping Song, Meibao Zhuang","doi":"10.4161/gmcr.2.1.15622","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As part of the regulatory safety assessment for transgenic crops, the DNA of the genetic insert and insert/flanking-region junctions are searched for random reading frames that could encode unsafe proteins. In addition, the endogenous flanking regions are examined to determine if the insert disrupts endogenous genes or regulatory elements. We discuss the likelihood of these events in the context of traditional breeding and in the context of the probability that cryptic reading frames might encode unsafe proteins. We conclude that there is a lack of theoretical and empirical evidence to suggest that these safety risks are significant or different compared with those of traditional crop breeding.","PeriodicalId":89376,"journal":{"name":"GM crops","volume":"2 1","pages":"4-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4161/gmcr.2.1.15622","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GM crops","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4161/gmcr.2.1.15622","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

As part of the regulatory safety assessment for transgenic crops, the DNA of the genetic insert and insert/flanking-region junctions are searched for random reading frames that could encode unsafe proteins. In addition, the endogenous flanking regions are examined to determine if the insert disrupts endogenous genes or regulatory elements. We discuss the likelihood of these events in the context of traditional breeding and in the context of the probability that cryptic reading frames might encode unsafe proteins. We conclude that there is a lack of theoretical and empirical evidence to suggest that these safety risks are significant or different compared with those of traditional crop breeding.
农作物转基因导致的隐读框和基因破坏的安全风险:几率是多少?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信