In a free healthcare system, why do men not consult for lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS)?

Q1 Medicine
U Chong Lai, Yuk Tsan Wun, Tze Chao Luo, Sai Meng Pang
{"title":"In a free healthcare system, why do men not consult for lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS)?","authors":"U Chong Lai,&nbsp;Yuk Tsan Wun,&nbsp;Tze Chao Luo,&nbsp;Sai Meng Pang","doi":"10.1186/1447-056X-10-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The prevalence of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) varies among different populations but the rate of seeking medical advice is consistently low. Little is known about the reasons for this low rate. In the city of Macau, China, primary healthcare is free and easily accessible to all citizens. We aim to study the patients' rate of consulting for LUTS and their reasons for not consulting under a free healthcare system.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A convenience sample of 549 male patients aged 40-85 years in a government health centre filled in the International Prostate Symptoms Scale (IPSS) questionnaire. They were also asked if they had consulted doctors for LUTS, and if not, why not.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Of the whole sample, 64 men (11.7%) had ever consulted doctors for LUTS. Of 145 with moderate to severe LUTS, 35 (24.1%) consulted. Of 73 who were dissatisfied with their quality of life, 22 (30.1%) consulted. Regarding the symptoms as normal or not problematic was the main reason for not consulting. Advancing age and duration of symptoms were the significant factors for consulting.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Primary care doctors could help many of LUTS patients by sensitively initiating the discussion when these patients consult for other problems.</p>","PeriodicalId":39050,"journal":{"name":"Asia Pacific Family Medicine","volume":"10 1","pages":"7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/1447-056X-10-7","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia Pacific Family Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/1447-056X-10-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

Background: The prevalence of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) varies among different populations but the rate of seeking medical advice is consistently low. Little is known about the reasons for this low rate. In the city of Macau, China, primary healthcare is free and easily accessible to all citizens. We aim to study the patients' rate of consulting for LUTS and their reasons for not consulting under a free healthcare system.

Method: A convenience sample of 549 male patients aged 40-85 years in a government health centre filled in the International Prostate Symptoms Scale (IPSS) questionnaire. They were also asked if they had consulted doctors for LUTS, and if not, why not.

Result: Of the whole sample, 64 men (11.7%) had ever consulted doctors for LUTS. Of 145 with moderate to severe LUTS, 35 (24.1%) consulted. Of 73 who were dissatisfied with their quality of life, 22 (30.1%) consulted. Regarding the symptoms as normal or not problematic was the main reason for not consulting. Advancing age and duration of symptoms were the significant factors for consulting.

Conclusion: Primary care doctors could help many of LUTS patients by sensitively initiating the discussion when these patients consult for other problems.

在免费医疗体系中,为什么男性不咨询下尿路症状(LUTS)?
背景:下尿路症状(LUTS)的患病率在不同人群中有所不同,但求诊率一直很低。人们对这种低比率的原因知之甚少。在中国澳门,初级医疗保健是免费的,所有公民都可以很容易地获得。我们的目的是研究在免费医疗制度下,LUTS患者的咨询率和他们不咨询的原因。方法:选取某公立卫生院549例40 ~ 85岁男性患者,填写国际前列腺症状量表(IPSS)问卷。他们还被问及是否咨询过LUTS的医生,如果没有,为什么没有。结果:在全部样本中,64名男性(11.7%)曾因LUTS就诊。145例中重度LUTS患者中,35例(24.1%)进行了咨询。在对生活质量不满意的73人中,22人(30.1%)进行了咨询。认为症状正常或没有问题是不咨询的主要原因。年龄的增长和症状的持续时间是咨询的重要因素。结论:初级保健医生可以帮助许多LUTS患者,在这些患者咨询其他问题时,敏感地提出讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Asia Pacific Family Medicine
Asia Pacific Family Medicine Medicine-Family Practice
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信