An analysis of the socio-demographic characteristics of sole registered births and infant deaths.

Julie Messer
{"title":"An analysis of the socio-demographic characteristics of sole registered births and infant deaths.","authors":"Julie Messer","doi":"10.1057/hsq.2011.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Differences in birth characteristics and infant mortality rates by marital status and birth registration type reflect complex underlying factors. In particular, births registered solely by the mother are seen as a disadvantaged group. This article analyses the socio-demographic characteristics of births by registration type and parents' marital status and explores these differences for health outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Birth notifications data from the NHS Numbers for Babies system was linked to birth registration data held by the Office for National Statistics (ONS) for births occurring in 2007 and 2008 in England and Wales. This dataset was further linked to death registration data to identify infants who died before their first birthday.Regression analysis was used to compare factors and health outcomes across marital and registration status groups. Regression models were calculated to determine the main risk factors for poor outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The registration groups differed in the age of the mother at birth, the proportion of young mothers, ethnic group distribution and measures of deprived circumstances. The joint registered-different address and sole registered groups were similar in the proportion of young mothers and the deprivation indices. The groups also differed in the proportion of low birthweight and premature babies. The joint registered-different address and sole registered groups both had higher percentages of 'small for gestational age' babies compared with the within-marriage and joint registered-same address groups. The stillbirth rate was highest in the sole registered group. Both the joint registered-different address and sole registered groups had higher infant mortality rates compared with the within-marriage and joint registered-same address groups. Multivariate analysis indicated that low birthweight was a key factor in infant mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Births registered solely by the mother were found to be a disadvantaged group but were also similar to the joint-registered group living at different addresses in their main socio-demographic characteristics and health outcomes. The joint-registered group living at the same address was similar to the within-marriage group across the same measures. This argues that, in the 21st century, the distinction between infants with 'resident' and 'nonresident' fathers is more meaningful for health outcomes than that between births inside and outside marriage.</p>","PeriodicalId":87183,"journal":{"name":"Health statistics quarterly","volume":" 50","pages":"79-107"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1057/hsq.2011.9","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health statistics quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1057/hsq.2011.9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Background: Differences in birth characteristics and infant mortality rates by marital status and birth registration type reflect complex underlying factors. In particular, births registered solely by the mother are seen as a disadvantaged group. This article analyses the socio-demographic characteristics of births by registration type and parents' marital status and explores these differences for health outcomes.

Methods: Birth notifications data from the NHS Numbers for Babies system was linked to birth registration data held by the Office for National Statistics (ONS) for births occurring in 2007 and 2008 in England and Wales. This dataset was further linked to death registration data to identify infants who died before their first birthday.Regression analysis was used to compare factors and health outcomes across marital and registration status groups. Regression models were calculated to determine the main risk factors for poor outcomes.

Results: The registration groups differed in the age of the mother at birth, the proportion of young mothers, ethnic group distribution and measures of deprived circumstances. The joint registered-different address and sole registered groups were similar in the proportion of young mothers and the deprivation indices. The groups also differed in the proportion of low birthweight and premature babies. The joint registered-different address and sole registered groups both had higher percentages of 'small for gestational age' babies compared with the within-marriage and joint registered-same address groups. The stillbirth rate was highest in the sole registered group. Both the joint registered-different address and sole registered groups had higher infant mortality rates compared with the within-marriage and joint registered-same address groups. Multivariate analysis indicated that low birthweight was a key factor in infant mortality.

Conclusions: Births registered solely by the mother were found to be a disadvantaged group but were also similar to the joint-registered group living at different addresses in their main socio-demographic characteristics and health outcomes. The joint-registered group living at the same address was similar to the within-marriage group across the same measures. This argues that, in the 21st century, the distinction between infants with 'resident' and 'nonresident' fathers is more meaningful for health outcomes than that between births inside and outside marriage.

对单独登记出生和婴儿死亡的社会人口特征的分析。
背景:不同婚姻状况和出生登记类型的出生特征和婴儿死亡率的差异反映了复杂的潜在因素。特别是,仅由母亲登记的出生被视为弱势群体。本文分析了按登记类型和父母婚姻状况划分的出生的社会人口特征,并探讨了这些差异对健康结果的影响。方法:来自NHS婴儿编号系统的出生通知数据与国家统计局(ONS)持有的2007年和2008年英格兰和威尔士出生登记数据相关联。该数据集进一步与死亡登记数据联系起来,以确定在一周岁前死亡的婴儿。采用回归分析比较不同婚姻和登记状态组的因素和健康结果。计算回归模型以确定不良预后的主要危险因素。结果:登记组在出生母亲年龄、年轻母亲比例、民族分布和贫困情况措施等方面存在差异。不同地址联合登记组和单独登记组的年轻母亲比例和剥夺指数相似。两组在低出生体重和早产儿的比例上也存在差异。同婚内和同址联合登记组相比,不同地址联合登记组和单独登记组的“小于胎龄”婴儿比例都更高。死胎率在单独登记组最高。同婚内同址组和同址组相比,同址组和同址组的婴儿死亡率更高。多因素分析表明,低出生体重是婴儿死亡率的关键因素。结论:仅由母亲登记的出生被认为是一个弱势群体,但在主要社会人口特征和健康结果方面也与居住在不同地址的联合登记群体相似。在相同的测量中,居住在同一地址的联合登记组与婚姻内组相似。这表明,在21世纪,与婚内和婚外生育的区别相比,“本地”和“非本地”父亲生育的婴儿对健康结果的影响更大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书