Lebron v. Gottlieb Memorial Hospital: capping medical practice reform in Illinois.

Annals of health law Pub Date : 2011-01-01
Leonard Nelson, Amanda Swanson, Marianne Buckley
{"title":"Lebron v. Gottlieb Memorial Hospital: capping medical practice reform in Illinois.","authors":"Leonard Nelson,&nbsp;Amanda Swanson,&nbsp;Marianne Buckley","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>On February 4, 2010 the Illinois Supreme Court struck down Illinois' medical practice reform bill, P.A. 94-677, when it decided Lebron v. Gottlieb Memorial Hospital. Although the court only considered the unconstitutionality of the cap on non-economic damages contained in that bill, an inseverability provision resulted in the invalidation of all of its provisions. The end result of the Lebron decision extends much further than the striking of the cap on non-economic damages. It affects such areas as medical liability insurance law, physician discipline, public disclosure of information, the admissibility of physician statements into evidence, and expert witness standards. The Lebron holding has raised a significant obstacle to the implementation of a wide range of legislative measures intended to improve both the delivery and quality of healthcare services in Illinois. This article explains the impact of Lebron in these collateral, but important, areas of the law.</p>","PeriodicalId":79788,"journal":{"name":"Annals of health law","volume":"20 1","pages":"1-13, 8 p preceding 1"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of health law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

On February 4, 2010 the Illinois Supreme Court struck down Illinois' medical practice reform bill, P.A. 94-677, when it decided Lebron v. Gottlieb Memorial Hospital. Although the court only considered the unconstitutionality of the cap on non-economic damages contained in that bill, an inseverability provision resulted in the invalidation of all of its provisions. The end result of the Lebron decision extends much further than the striking of the cap on non-economic damages. It affects such areas as medical liability insurance law, physician discipline, public disclosure of information, the admissibility of physician statements into evidence, and expert witness standards. The Lebron holding has raised a significant obstacle to the implementation of a wide range of legislative measures intended to improve both the delivery and quality of healthcare services in Illinois. This article explains the impact of Lebron in these collateral, but important, areas of the law.

勒布朗诉戈特利布纪念医院:限制伊利诺伊州医疗实践改革。
2010年2月4日,伊利诺斯州最高法院在裁决勒布朗诉戈特利布纪念医院案时,驳回了伊利诺斯州医疗实践改革法案P.A. 94-677。虽然法院只认为该法案所载的非经济损害赔偿上限不符合宪法,但不可分割性条款导致其所有条款无效。勒布朗决定的最终结果远远超出了对非经济损失上限的打击。它影响到诸如医疗责任保险法、医生纪律、公开披露信息、医生陈述作为证据的可接受性以及专家证人标准等领域。勒布朗案给伊利诺斯州一系列旨在改善医疗服务提供和质量的立法措施的实施带来了重大障碍。这篇文章解释了勒布朗在这些附带但重要的法律领域的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信