4D imaging and 4D radiation therapy: a New Era of therapy design and delivery.

Frontiers of Radiation Therapy and Oncology Pub Date : 2011-01-01 Epub Date: 2011-05-20 DOI:10.1159/000322410
Daniel Low
{"title":"4D imaging and 4D radiation therapy: a New Era of therapy design and delivery.","authors":"Daniel Low","doi":"10.1159/000322410","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recently developed 4D CT imaging technologies have shown that significant organ motion can occur within radiotherapy fields during treatment. Most often a result of respiration, this motion can cause dose delivery errors that are clinically significant when unmanaged, as demonstrated in many recent investigations. Motion during the regular breathing cycling is important, but day-to-day breathing variations, as may be caused by changes in residual tidal volume, can cause systematic shifts in tumor position. These may cause delivery misalignments because the tumor is not in the same average location at each treatment. Approaches to management of this motion may involve motion-inclusive planning, gating or tracking. 4D CT has been instrumental in most of these approaches. Given the state of treatment planning software, it is not possible to preplan whether a specific patient would benefit from one or another of these methods. Daily imaging (or use of a nonimage-based system such as Calypso) is necessary to locate the tumor, and the location must be correlated with measurements from a system that tracks breathing motion during treatment delivery. This is typically done using an independent metric that characterizes the breathing cycle (e.g. the height of the abdomen). Only then can the treatment plan be accurately implemented. There are many methods to manage tumor motion, though most are challenging to implement and remain poorly supported by vendors. When determining which system to use, an important distinction between competing approaches is whether they are amplitude- or phase-based. Some implementations may use different approaches for different parts of the treatment planning and delivery process, potentially introducing errors in the characterization of breathing motion. While many advances have been achieved and are discussed here, the development of solid, stable and robust processes to effectively manage breathing motion remains a foremost and continuing challenge in radiotherapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":55140,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers of Radiation Therapy and Oncology","volume":"43 ","pages":"99-117"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000322410","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers of Radiation Therapy and Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000322410","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2011/5/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Recently developed 4D CT imaging technologies have shown that significant organ motion can occur within radiotherapy fields during treatment. Most often a result of respiration, this motion can cause dose delivery errors that are clinically significant when unmanaged, as demonstrated in many recent investigations. Motion during the regular breathing cycling is important, but day-to-day breathing variations, as may be caused by changes in residual tidal volume, can cause systematic shifts in tumor position. These may cause delivery misalignments because the tumor is not in the same average location at each treatment. Approaches to management of this motion may involve motion-inclusive planning, gating or tracking. 4D CT has been instrumental in most of these approaches. Given the state of treatment planning software, it is not possible to preplan whether a specific patient would benefit from one or another of these methods. Daily imaging (or use of a nonimage-based system such as Calypso) is necessary to locate the tumor, and the location must be correlated with measurements from a system that tracks breathing motion during treatment delivery. This is typically done using an independent metric that characterizes the breathing cycle (e.g. the height of the abdomen). Only then can the treatment plan be accurately implemented. There are many methods to manage tumor motion, though most are challenging to implement and remain poorly supported by vendors. When determining which system to use, an important distinction between competing approaches is whether they are amplitude- or phase-based. Some implementations may use different approaches for different parts of the treatment planning and delivery process, potentially introducing errors in the characterization of breathing motion. While many advances have been achieved and are discussed here, the development of solid, stable and robust processes to effectively manage breathing motion remains a foremost and continuing challenge in radiotherapy.

四维成像和四维放射治疗:治疗设计和传递的新时代。
最近发展的4D CT成像技术显示,在治疗过程中,放疗场内可能发生明显的器官运动。正如最近的许多研究所证明的那样,这种运动通常是呼吸作用的结果,如果不加以控制,可能导致剂量传递错误,这在临床上具有重大意义。在有规律的呼吸循环过程中的运动是重要的,但日常的呼吸变化,如可能由残留潮气量的变化引起的,可引起肿瘤位置的系统性移动。这可能会导致输送错位,因为每次治疗时肿瘤的平均位置不同。这种运动的管理方法可能涉及运动包容性规划、门控或跟踪。4D CT在这些方法中发挥了重要作用。鉴于治疗计划软件的现状,不可能预先计划一个特定的病人是否会从这些方法中受益。日常成像(或使用非基于图像的系统,如Calypso)是定位肿瘤的必要条件,并且该位置必须与在治疗过程中跟踪呼吸运动的系统的测量结果相关联。这通常使用表征呼吸周期(例如腹部的高度)的独立度量来完成。只有这样才能准确地执行治疗计划。有许多方法来管理肿瘤运动,尽管大多数是具有挑战性的实现和仍然缺乏支持的供应商。在决定使用哪个系统时,竞争方法之间的一个重要区别是它们是基于幅度还是基于相位。一些实现可能对治疗计划和交付过程的不同部分使用不同的方法,这可能会在呼吸运动的表征中引入错误。虽然已经取得了许多进展,并在这里讨论,发展坚实,稳定和强大的过程来有效地管理呼吸运动仍然是放射治疗中最重要和持续的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信