Case series of post-thrombolysis patients undergoing hemicraniectomy for malignant anterior circulation ischaemic stroke.

Cardiovascular psychiatry and neurology Pub Date : 2011-01-01 Epub Date: 2011-04-18 DOI:10.1155/2011/254569
A Williams, M Sittampalam, N Barua, A Mohd Nor
{"title":"Case series of post-thrombolysis patients undergoing hemicraniectomy for malignant anterior circulation ischaemic stroke.","authors":"A Williams,&nbsp;M Sittampalam,&nbsp;N Barua,&nbsp;A Mohd Nor","doi":"10.1155/2011/254569","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>While ischaemic stroke remains a leading cause of death and disability, there have been recent advancements in treatment modalities including thrombolysis and decompressive hemicraniectomy. A retrospective review of patients treated in our NHS teaching hospital, in Plymouth (UK), over a 2 year period identified 17 thrombolysed patients, of whom two had undergone subsequent decompressive hemicraniectomy. These were non-dominant hemisphere strokes in young patients, aged 51 and 57. Initial NIHSS scores were 16 and 17, and they received thrombolysis at 2 hrs 42 min and 5 hrs 10 min post onset of symptoms respectively. CT imaging demonstrated cerebral swelling with significant midline shift in both cases, and decompressive hemicraniectomy was undertaken at 29 hrs 8 min and 27 hrs 30 min post-thrombolysis. We found no significant intra-operative complications attributable to prior use of thrombolytics. Both patients have had acceptable psychological and physical outcomes, with Barthel Index scores of 40 and 25, and MMSE scores of 29/30 and 27/30. We conclude that the use of thrombolytic therapy does not contra-indicate subsequent decompressive hemicraniectomy in well selected patients with non-dominant hemisphere strokes. More research in this field is required to elucidate factors which would facilitate recognition of stroke patients who will benefit most from aggressive medical and neurosurgical intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":88441,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular psychiatry and neurology","volume":"2011 ","pages":"254569"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2011/254569","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular psychiatry and neurology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/254569","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2011/4/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

While ischaemic stroke remains a leading cause of death and disability, there have been recent advancements in treatment modalities including thrombolysis and decompressive hemicraniectomy. A retrospective review of patients treated in our NHS teaching hospital, in Plymouth (UK), over a 2 year period identified 17 thrombolysed patients, of whom two had undergone subsequent decompressive hemicraniectomy. These were non-dominant hemisphere strokes in young patients, aged 51 and 57. Initial NIHSS scores were 16 and 17, and they received thrombolysis at 2 hrs 42 min and 5 hrs 10 min post onset of symptoms respectively. CT imaging demonstrated cerebral swelling with significant midline shift in both cases, and decompressive hemicraniectomy was undertaken at 29 hrs 8 min and 27 hrs 30 min post-thrombolysis. We found no significant intra-operative complications attributable to prior use of thrombolytics. Both patients have had acceptable psychological and physical outcomes, with Barthel Index scores of 40 and 25, and MMSE scores of 29/30 and 27/30. We conclude that the use of thrombolytic therapy does not contra-indicate subsequent decompressive hemicraniectomy in well selected patients with non-dominant hemisphere strokes. More research in this field is required to elucidate factors which would facilitate recognition of stroke patients who will benefit most from aggressive medical and neurosurgical intervention.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

恶性前循环缺血性脑卒中溶栓后行半脑切除术的病例系列。
虽然缺血性中风仍然是导致死亡和残疾的主要原因,但最近在治疗方式方面取得了进展,包括溶栓和减压半脑切除术。在我们位于普利茅斯(英国)的NHS教学医院接受治疗的患者中,回顾性分析了17例溶栓患者,其中2例接受了随后的减压性半骨切除术。这些是51岁和57岁的年轻患者的非显性半球卒中。初始NIHSS评分分别为16分和17分,分别在症状出现后2小时42分和5小时10分接受溶栓治疗。CT成像显示两例患者脑肿胀,中线移位明显,分别于溶栓后29小时8分钟和27小时30分钟行半颅骨减压切除术。我们没有发现术前使用溶栓剂引起的明显术中并发症。两名患者均有可接受的心理和生理结果,Barthel指数评分分别为40和25,MMSE评分分别为29/30和27/30。我们的结论是,在选择良好的非优势半球卒中患者中,使用溶栓治疗并不与随后的降压性半脑切除术相矛盾。需要在这一领域进行更多的研究,以阐明有助于识别中风患者的因素,哪些患者将从积极的医学和神经外科干预中获益最多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信