Physicians' evaluation of clinical pharmacy revealed increased focus on quality improvement and cost savings.

Danish medical bulletin Pub Date : 2011-05-01
Lene Juel Kjeldsen, Trine Bjerregaard Jensen, Jens Jørn Jensen
{"title":"Physicians' evaluation of clinical pharmacy revealed increased focus on quality improvement and cost savings.","authors":"Lene Juel Kjeldsen,&nbsp;Trine Bjerregaard Jensen,&nbsp;Jens Jørn Jensen","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The aims of the present study were to evaluate physicians' satisfaction with medication services delivered by a clinical pharmacist (CP); to investigate and document to which extent a CP could improve the medication quality and reduce medication costs at an intensive care unit (ICU); and to explore which types of tasks the CP was asked to perform.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The project was conducted at an ICU from 1 February to 31 August 2008. The intervention consisted of certain tasks being performed by a CP. The intervention was evaluated on the basis of documentation of the intervention performed and on a questionnaire filled in by physicians at the end of the study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The majority of the physicians reported that the CP's intervention had raised their attention to medication costs (70%) and medication quality (76%). This physician-reported impression correlated with the CP's intervention which improved medication quality and catalysed an annual estimated cost saving of at least DKK 330,000, which was achieved by targeting particular medication areas. The CP was asked to perform various medication-related tasks during the project period. Indeed, the physicians reported that they found the CP qualified to perform several medication-related tasks--and many physicians reported that they had benefitted from input regarding those tasks.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The intervention occasioned positive physician feedback on clinical pharmacy services and the study shows that the CP was perceived by the physicians as a valuable professional collaborator.</p>","PeriodicalId":11019,"journal":{"name":"Danish medical bulletin","volume":"58 5","pages":"A4261"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Danish medical bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The aims of the present study were to evaluate physicians' satisfaction with medication services delivered by a clinical pharmacist (CP); to investigate and document to which extent a CP could improve the medication quality and reduce medication costs at an intensive care unit (ICU); and to explore which types of tasks the CP was asked to perform.

Material and methods: The project was conducted at an ICU from 1 February to 31 August 2008. The intervention consisted of certain tasks being performed by a CP. The intervention was evaluated on the basis of documentation of the intervention performed and on a questionnaire filled in by physicians at the end of the study.

Results: The majority of the physicians reported that the CP's intervention had raised their attention to medication costs (70%) and medication quality (76%). This physician-reported impression correlated with the CP's intervention which improved medication quality and catalysed an annual estimated cost saving of at least DKK 330,000, which was achieved by targeting particular medication areas. The CP was asked to perform various medication-related tasks during the project period. Indeed, the physicians reported that they found the CP qualified to perform several medication-related tasks--and many physicians reported that they had benefitted from input regarding those tasks.

Conclusion: The intervention occasioned positive physician feedback on clinical pharmacy services and the study shows that the CP was perceived by the physicians as a valuable professional collaborator.

医生对临床药学的评价显示,他们越来越注重提高质量和节约成本。
前言:本研究的目的是评估医师对临床药师(CP)提供的用药服务的满意度;调查和记录CP在多大程度上可以提高重症监护病房(ICU)的用药质量和降低用药成本;并探索CP被要求执行哪些类型的任务。材料和方法:该项目于2008年2月1日至8月31日在ICU进行。干预包括由CP执行的某些任务。干预是根据所执行的干预文件和研究结束时医生填写的问卷进行评估的。结果:大多数医生报告CP的干预提高了他们对用药费用(70%)和用药质量(76%)的关注。这种医生报告的印象与CP的干预相关,CP的干预提高了用药质量,并通过针对特定的用药区域,每年估计节省了至少33万丹麦克朗。在项目期间,CP被要求执行各种与药物相关的任务。事实上,医生报告说,他们发现CP有资格执行一些与药物相关的任务——许多医生报告说,他们从这些任务的输入中受益。结论:干预引起了医生对临床药学服务的积极反馈,研究表明,医生认为CP是一个有价值的专业合作者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Danish medical bulletin
Danish medical bulletin 医学-医学:内科
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信