High mortality after emergency room laparotomy in haemodynamically unstable trauma patients.

Danish medical bulletin Pub Date : 2011-05-01
Helle Lund, Steen Christian Kofoed, Jens Georg Hillingsø, Claus Falck-Larsen, Lars Bo Svendsen
{"title":"High mortality after emergency room laparotomy in haemodynamically unstable trauma patients.","authors":"Helle Lund,&nbsp;Steen Christian Kofoed,&nbsp;Jens Georg Hillingsø,&nbsp;Claus Falck-Larsen,&nbsp;Lars Bo Svendsen","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Hypovolaemic shock is a major course of death in trauma patients. The mortality in patients in profound shock at the time of arrival is extremely high and we wanted to investigate the outcome of patients undergoing laparotomy at the Trauma Care Unit (TCU).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Forty-four emergency laparotomies performed at the TCU at Rigshospitalet between January 2003 and December 2009 were registered. The indication for surgical intervention was based on persisting, unstable haemodynamics and either positive findings at focused abdominal sonography in trauma (FAST) or penetrating injury. In some patients, laparotomy was performed despite a negative FAST because of ongoing instability. The patients were stratified according to their systolic blood pressure (BP).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After 24 hours, 46% (20 patients) of the patients were alive. The survival after 30 days was 41% (18 patients). Stratifying the patients into three categories according to the systolic BP at the time of arrival (BP > 80 mmHg (n = 14), 80 mmHg ≥ BP > 60 mmHg (n = 10) and BP ≤ 60 mmHg (n = 20) revealed a 64%, 50% and 34% survival rate within the first 24 hours (p = 0.04). In the group of patients with BP ≤ 60 mmHg, the survival decreased to 20% after 30 days. Stratification by penetrating or blunt trauma showed no significant difference in survival (40% versus 50% survival after 30 days) (p = 0.40). However, in those patients arriving with BP ≤ 60 mmHg (five penetrating and 15 blunt injuries), we found that the survival rate after laparotomy was 60% and 13%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The present study shows that haemodynamically unstable patients with abdominal or suspected abdominal injuries undergoing emergency laparotomy have a high mortality, especially those with BP ≤ 60 mmHg. Patients with a penetrating trauma have a far better prognosis than those with a blunt trauma.</p>","PeriodicalId":11019,"journal":{"name":"Danish medical bulletin","volume":"58 5","pages":"A4275"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Danish medical bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Hypovolaemic shock is a major course of death in trauma patients. The mortality in patients in profound shock at the time of arrival is extremely high and we wanted to investigate the outcome of patients undergoing laparotomy at the Trauma Care Unit (TCU).

Material and methods: Forty-four emergency laparotomies performed at the TCU at Rigshospitalet between January 2003 and December 2009 were registered. The indication for surgical intervention was based on persisting, unstable haemodynamics and either positive findings at focused abdominal sonography in trauma (FAST) or penetrating injury. In some patients, laparotomy was performed despite a negative FAST because of ongoing instability. The patients were stratified according to their systolic blood pressure (BP).

Results: After 24 hours, 46% (20 patients) of the patients were alive. The survival after 30 days was 41% (18 patients). Stratifying the patients into three categories according to the systolic BP at the time of arrival (BP > 80 mmHg (n = 14), 80 mmHg ≥ BP > 60 mmHg (n = 10) and BP ≤ 60 mmHg (n = 20) revealed a 64%, 50% and 34% survival rate within the first 24 hours (p = 0.04). In the group of patients with BP ≤ 60 mmHg, the survival decreased to 20% after 30 days. Stratification by penetrating or blunt trauma showed no significant difference in survival (40% versus 50% survival after 30 days) (p = 0.40). However, in those patients arriving with BP ≤ 60 mmHg (five penetrating and 15 blunt injuries), we found that the survival rate after laparotomy was 60% and 13%, respectively.

Conclusion: The present study shows that haemodynamically unstable patients with abdominal or suspected abdominal injuries undergoing emergency laparotomy have a high mortality, especially those with BP ≤ 60 mmHg. Patients with a penetrating trauma have a far better prognosis than those with a blunt trauma.

血流动力学不稳定创伤患者急诊剖腹手术后的高死亡率。
前言:低血容量性休克是创伤患者死亡的主要原因。深度休克患者在到达时的死亡率非常高,我们想调查在创伤护理病房(TCU)接受剖腹手术的患者的结果。材料和方法:记录2003年1月至2009年12月在Rigshospitalet TCU进行的44例急诊剖腹手术。手术干预的指征是基于持续,不稳定的血流动力学和创伤(FAST)或穿透性损伤的腹部超声检查阳性结果。在一些患者中,由于持续的不稳定,尽管FAST呈阴性,但仍进行了剖腹手术。根据患者的收缩压(BP)进行分层。结果:24小时后,46%(20例)患者存活。30 d生存率41%(18例)。根据患者到达时的收缩压(BP > 80 mmHg (n = 14)、80 mmHg≥BP > 60 mmHg (n = 10)和BP≤60 mmHg (n = 20)将患者分为3类,24小时内生存率分别为64%、50%和34% (p = 0.04)。血压≤60 mmHg组,30天后生存率降至20%。穿透性或钝性创伤分层的生存率无显著差异(30天后存活率为40% vs 50%) (p = 0.40)。然而,在血压≤60mmhg(5例穿透性损伤和15例钝性损伤)的患者中,我们发现剖腹手术后的生存率分别为60%和13%。结论:血流动力学不稳定的腹部或疑似腹部损伤患者急诊剖腹手术死亡率高,尤其是血压≤60 mmHg的患者。穿透性创伤患者的预后要比钝性创伤患者好得多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Danish medical bulletin
Danish medical bulletin 医学-医学:内科
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信