Aetiology, treatment and mortality after oesophageal perforation in Denmark.

Danish medical bulletin Pub Date : 2011-05-01
Philip Ryom, Jesper Bohsen Ravn, Luit Penninga, Susanne Schmidt, Maria Gerding Iversen, Peter Skov-Olsen, Henrik Kehlet
{"title":"Aetiology, treatment and mortality after oesophageal perforation in Denmark.","authors":"Philip Ryom,&nbsp;Jesper Bohsen Ravn,&nbsp;Luit Penninga,&nbsp;Susanne Schmidt,&nbsp;Maria Gerding Iversen,&nbsp;Peter Skov-Olsen,&nbsp;Henrik Kehlet","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Perforation of the oesophagus into the thoracic cavity is a potentially life-threatening condition. The causes are numerous. Treatment for oesophageal perforation targets mediastinal and pleural contamination. Present knowledge about the causes of perforation and the types of treatment is poor.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A retrospective review was made between 1997 and 2005 based on extracts from the National Patient Registry.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 286 patients were diagnosed with perforation of the oesophagus (131 women and 155 men). Their average age was 60 years. A wide spectrum of causes was reported, e.g. instrumentation of the oesophagus 136 (47.6%), spontaneous rupture 89 (31.1%) or procedures otherwise related to surgical intervention 9 (3.1%). One third of the patients started conservative treatment 91 (31.9%). The majority of the patients were transferred to a thoracic surgery department for further treatment: about 25% of patients underwent surgery. The average hospitalization time was 18 days. The mortality rate was 21%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Oesophageal perforation remains a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge and the condition requires aggressive treatment. Recent consensus in early treatment with thoracotomy, debridement, irrigation and subsequent parenteral nutrition has improved survival. In this material, most perforations were iatrogenic in nature. In the 2002-2005 period, the study showed that 29% of the iatrogenic perforations were caused by the use of a rigid endoscope which is risky and whose use should therefore be restricted. It is advisable to set up national guidelines for treatment of oesophageal perforation and to centralise treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":11019,"journal":{"name":"Danish medical bulletin","volume":"58 5","pages":"A4267"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Danish medical bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Perforation of the oesophagus into the thoracic cavity is a potentially life-threatening condition. The causes are numerous. Treatment for oesophageal perforation targets mediastinal and pleural contamination. Present knowledge about the causes of perforation and the types of treatment is poor.

Material and methods: A retrospective review was made between 1997 and 2005 based on extracts from the National Patient Registry.

Results: A total of 286 patients were diagnosed with perforation of the oesophagus (131 women and 155 men). Their average age was 60 years. A wide spectrum of causes was reported, e.g. instrumentation of the oesophagus 136 (47.6%), spontaneous rupture 89 (31.1%) or procedures otherwise related to surgical intervention 9 (3.1%). One third of the patients started conservative treatment 91 (31.9%). The majority of the patients were transferred to a thoracic surgery department for further treatment: about 25% of patients underwent surgery. The average hospitalization time was 18 days. The mortality rate was 21%.

Conclusion: Oesophageal perforation remains a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge and the condition requires aggressive treatment. Recent consensus in early treatment with thoracotomy, debridement, irrigation and subsequent parenteral nutrition has improved survival. In this material, most perforations were iatrogenic in nature. In the 2002-2005 period, the study showed that 29% of the iatrogenic perforations were caused by the use of a rigid endoscope which is risky and whose use should therefore be restricted. It is advisable to set up national guidelines for treatment of oesophageal perforation and to centralise treatment.

丹麦食道穿孔的病因、治疗和死亡率。
食道穿孔进入胸腔是一种潜在的危及生命的疾病。原因有很多。治疗食道穿孔针对纵隔和胸膜污染。目前关于穿孔的原因和治疗方法的知识很少。材料和方法:在1997年至2005年期间,根据国家患者登记处的摘录进行回顾性审查。结果:286例患者确诊为食道穿孔,其中女性131例,男性155例。他们的平均年龄为60岁。报告的原因范围很广,例如,食道内固定136例(47.6%),自发破裂89例(31.1%)或与手术干预相关的手术9例(3.1%)。1 / 3的患者开始保守治疗91例(31.9%)。大多数患者被转移到胸外科进行进一步治疗:约25%的患者接受了手术。平均住院时间为18天。死亡率为21%。结论:食道穿孔仍然是一个诊断和治疗上的挑战,需要积极的治疗。最近的共识是,早期治疗采用开胸、清创、冲洗和随后的肠外营养改善了生存率。在这种材料中,大多数穿孔本质上是医源性的。在2002-2005年期间,研究表明29%的医源性穿孔是由使用刚性内窥镜引起的,这是有风险的,因此应限制使用。建议制定国家食管穿孔治疗指南,集中治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Danish medical bulletin
Danish medical bulletin 医学-医学:内科
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信