Community Partners in Care: Leveraging Community Diversity to Improve Depression Care for Underserved Populations.

Dmitry Khodyakov, Peter Mendel, Elizabeth Dixon, Andrea Jones, Zoe Masongsong, Kenneth Wells
{"title":"Community Partners in Care: Leveraging Community Diversity to Improve Depression Care for Underserved Populations.","authors":"Dmitry Khodyakov, Peter Mendel, Elizabeth Dixon, Andrea Jones, Zoe Masongsong, Kenneth Wells","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Research suggests that the quality and outcomes of depression treatment for adults can be substantially improved through \"collaborative care\" programs. However, there is a lack of resources required to implement such programs in vulnerable communities. Our paper examines the planning phase of the Community Partners in Care (CPIC) initiative, which addresses this problem through a unique approach in which academic institutions partner directly with a wide range of community-based and service organizations in all phases of the project fielded in two underserved communities in Los Angeles. CPIC offers a unique opportunity to understand how diverse organizations can work together to address community depression care needs and to analyze the potential strengths and tradeoffs of coordinating among such varied entities. This article focuses on intra-group dynamics that surround the process of participatory research and reports results of the first wave of process evaluation of the planning phase of the CPIC initiative. Our analysis explores two main themes: Community-Partnered Participatory Research and benefits and challenges of collaboration in diverse groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":89284,"journal":{"name":"The international journal of diversity in organisations, communities and nations","volume":"9 2","pages":"167-182"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3082465/pdf/nihms-240597.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The international journal of diversity in organisations, communities and nations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research suggests that the quality and outcomes of depression treatment for adults can be substantially improved through "collaborative care" programs. However, there is a lack of resources required to implement such programs in vulnerable communities. Our paper examines the planning phase of the Community Partners in Care (CPIC) initiative, which addresses this problem through a unique approach in which academic institutions partner directly with a wide range of community-based and service organizations in all phases of the project fielded in two underserved communities in Los Angeles. CPIC offers a unique opportunity to understand how diverse organizations can work together to address community depression care needs and to analyze the potential strengths and tradeoffs of coordinating among such varied entities. This article focuses on intra-group dynamics that surround the process of participatory research and reports results of the first wave of process evaluation of the planning phase of the CPIC initiative. Our analysis explores two main themes: Community-Partnered Participatory Research and benefits and challenges of collaboration in diverse groups.

社区护理合作伙伴:利用社区多样性改善对未获服务人群的抑郁症护理。
研究表明,通过 "协作护理 "计划可以大大提高成人抑郁症治疗的质量和效果。然而,在弱势社区实施此类计划却缺乏必要的资源。我们的论文探讨了 "社区护理合作伙伴"(CPIC)计划的规划阶段,该计划通过一种独特的方法来解决这一问题,即学术机构直接与广泛的社区和服务组织合作,在洛杉矶两个服务不足的社区开展项目的各个阶段。CPIC 提供了一个独特的机会,让我们了解不同的组织可以如何合作,以满足社区抑郁症护理需求,并分析这些不同实体之间协调的潜在优势和权衡。本文重点关注围绕参与式研究过程的团体内部动态,并报告 CPIC 计划阶段第一波过程评估的结果。我们的分析探讨了两大主题:社区合作参与式研究和不同群体合作的益处与挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信