A survey of the labeling information provided for ayurvedic drugs marketed in India.

Supriya Bhalerao, Renuka Munshi, Prajakta Tilve, Dipti Kumbhar
{"title":"A survey of the labeling information provided for ayurvedic drugs marketed in India.","authors":"Supriya Bhalerao,&nbsp;Renuka Munshi,&nbsp;Prajakta Tilve,&nbsp;Dipti Kumbhar","doi":"10.4103/0974-7788.76785","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ayurvedic drugs fall under the purview of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 and labels on Ayurvedic drug containers need to comply with the requirements specified in this Act (Part XVII, 161). The present survey was conducted to evaluate whether Ayurvedic drug labels were in compliance with the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 with respect to their contents.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Ayurvedic drugs container labels at three Ayurvedic pharmacies were selected based on the convenience sampling method. Their contents were checked against a set of quality criteria given in the Act. The results are expressed as percentages.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Basic manufacturing details were present on all the 190 labels reviewed (101 classical and 89 proprietary formulations). References from authoritative books as specified in the 1st Schedule of the Act were mentioned on 90% of labels of the 101 classical formulations reviewed. Fifty-five percent (n = 56) labels of classical drugs and 79 (88%) labels of proprietary drugs provided an ingredient list. Although 20 (20%) of classical formulations and 13 (15%) of proprietary formulations labels mentioned the Cautions/Warnings, only one language (either English or Hindi) was used.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Ayurvedic drug container labels were not compliant with most of the requirements specified in the Act.</p>","PeriodicalId":88901,"journal":{"name":"International journal of Ayurveda research","volume":"1 4","pages":"220-2"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4103/0974-7788.76785","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of Ayurveda research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/0974-7788.76785","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Background: Ayurvedic drugs fall under the purview of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 and labels on Ayurvedic drug containers need to comply with the requirements specified in this Act (Part XVII, 161). The present survey was conducted to evaluate whether Ayurvedic drug labels were in compliance with the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 with respect to their contents.

Materials and methods: Ayurvedic drugs container labels at three Ayurvedic pharmacies were selected based on the convenience sampling method. Their contents were checked against a set of quality criteria given in the Act. The results are expressed as percentages.

Results: Basic manufacturing details were present on all the 190 labels reviewed (101 classical and 89 proprietary formulations). References from authoritative books as specified in the 1st Schedule of the Act were mentioned on 90% of labels of the 101 classical formulations reviewed. Fifty-five percent (n = 56) labels of classical drugs and 79 (88%) labels of proprietary drugs provided an ingredient list. Although 20 (20%) of classical formulations and 13 (15%) of proprietary formulations labels mentioned the Cautions/Warnings, only one language (either English or Hindi) was used.

Conclusion: Ayurvedic drug container labels were not compliant with most of the requirements specified in the Act.

Abstract Image

对在印度销售的阿育吠陀药物提供的标签信息的调查。
背景:阿育吠陀药物属于1940年《药品和化妆品法》的管辖范围,阿育吠陀药物容器上的标签需要符合该法案规定的要求(第XVII部分,161)。本调查的目的是评估阿育吠陀药物标签的内容是否符合1940年《药品和化妆品法》的规定。材料与方法:采用方便抽样法,选取三家阿育吠陀药店的阿育吠陀药品容器标签。它们的内容是根据该法规定的一套质量标准进行检查的。结果以百分比表示。结果:审查的所有190个标签(101个经典配方和89个专有配方)上都有基本的生产细节。在审查的101个经典配方中,90%的标签上提到了该法案附表1中指定的权威书籍的参考资料。55% (n = 56)的经典药和79(88%)的中成药标签提供了成分表。尽管20个(20%)经典配方和13个(15%)专有配方的标签提到了注意事项/警告,但只使用了一种语言(英语或印地语)。结论:阿育吠陀药品容器标签不符合法案规定的大部分要求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信