The highly accurate anteriolateral portal for injecting the knee.

Colbert E Chavez-Chiang, Wilmer L Sibbitt, Philip A Band, Natalia R Chavez-Chiang, Suzanne L DeLea, Arthur D Bankhurst
{"title":"The highly accurate anteriolateral portal for injecting the knee.","authors":"Colbert E Chavez-Chiang,&nbsp;Wilmer L Sibbitt,&nbsp;Philip A Band,&nbsp;Natalia R Chavez-Chiang,&nbsp;Suzanne L DeLea,&nbsp;Arthur D Bankhurst","doi":"10.1186/1758-2555-3-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The extended knee lateral midpatellar portal for intraarticular injection of the knee is accurate but is not practical for all patients. We hypothesized that a modified anteriolateral portal where the synovial membrane of the medial femoral condyle is the target would be highly accurate and effective for intraarticular injection of the knee.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>83 subjects with non-effusive osteoarthritis of the knee were randomized to intraarticular injection using the modified anteriolateral bent knee versus the standard lateral midpatellar portal. After hydrodissection of the synovial membrane with lidocaine using a mechanical syringe (reciprocating procedure device), 80 mg of triamcinolone acetonide were injected into the knee with a 2.0-in (5.1-cm) 21-gauge needle. Baseline pain, procedural pain, and pain at outcome (2 weeks and 6 months) were determined with the 10 cm Visual Analogue Pain Score (VAS). The accuracy of needle placement was determined by sonographic imaging.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The lateral midpatellar and anteriolateral portals resulted in equivalent clinical outcomes including procedural pain (VAS midpatellar: 4.6 ± 3.1 cm; anteriolateral: 4.8 ± 3.2 cm; p = 0.77), pain at outcome (VAS midpatellar: 2.6 ± 2.8 cm; anteriolateral: 1.7 ± 2.3 cm; p = 0.11), responders (midpatellar: 45%; anteriolateral: 56%; p = 0.33), duration of therapeutic effect (midpatellar: 3.9 ± 2.4 months; anteriolateral: 4.1 ± 2.2 months; p = 0.69), and time to next procedure (midpatellar: 7.3 ± 3.3 months; anteriolateral: 7.7 ± 3.7 months; p = 0.71). The anteriolateral portal was 97% accurate by real-time ultrasound imaging.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The modified anteriolateral bent knee portal is an effective, accurate, and equivalent alternative to the standard lateral midpatellar portal for intraarticular injection of the knee.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00651625.</p>","PeriodicalId":88316,"journal":{"name":"Sports medicine, arthroscopy, rehabilitation, therapy & technology : SMARTT","volume":"3 1","pages":"6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/1758-2555-3-6","citationCount":"27","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports medicine, arthroscopy, rehabilitation, therapy & technology : SMARTT","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/1758-2555-3-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 27

Abstract

Background: The extended knee lateral midpatellar portal for intraarticular injection of the knee is accurate but is not practical for all patients. We hypothesized that a modified anteriolateral portal where the synovial membrane of the medial femoral condyle is the target would be highly accurate and effective for intraarticular injection of the knee.

Methods: 83 subjects with non-effusive osteoarthritis of the knee were randomized to intraarticular injection using the modified anteriolateral bent knee versus the standard lateral midpatellar portal. After hydrodissection of the synovial membrane with lidocaine using a mechanical syringe (reciprocating procedure device), 80 mg of triamcinolone acetonide were injected into the knee with a 2.0-in (5.1-cm) 21-gauge needle. Baseline pain, procedural pain, and pain at outcome (2 weeks and 6 months) were determined with the 10 cm Visual Analogue Pain Score (VAS). The accuracy of needle placement was determined by sonographic imaging.

Results: The lateral midpatellar and anteriolateral portals resulted in equivalent clinical outcomes including procedural pain (VAS midpatellar: 4.6 ± 3.1 cm; anteriolateral: 4.8 ± 3.2 cm; p = 0.77), pain at outcome (VAS midpatellar: 2.6 ± 2.8 cm; anteriolateral: 1.7 ± 2.3 cm; p = 0.11), responders (midpatellar: 45%; anteriolateral: 56%; p = 0.33), duration of therapeutic effect (midpatellar: 3.9 ± 2.4 months; anteriolateral: 4.1 ± 2.2 months; p = 0.69), and time to next procedure (midpatellar: 7.3 ± 3.3 months; anteriolateral: 7.7 ± 3.7 months; p = 0.71). The anteriolateral portal was 97% accurate by real-time ultrasound imaging.

Conclusion: The modified anteriolateral bent knee portal is an effective, accurate, and equivalent alternative to the standard lateral midpatellar portal for intraarticular injection of the knee.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00651625.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

高度精确的前外侧门静脉注射膝关节。
背景:膝关节关节内注射的膝外侧髌中门静脉延伸是准确的,但并非适用于所有患者。我们假设改良的前外侧门静脉,其中股骨内侧髁的滑膜是目标,将是高度准确和有效的膝关节关节内注射。方法:83例非渗出性膝骨关节炎患者随机分为改良前外侧弯曲膝关节和标准外侧髌骨中门静脉关节内注射组。用机械注射器(往复操作装置)用利多卡因对滑膜进行水解剖后,用2.0 in (5.1 cm) 21号针向膝关节内注射曲安奈德80 mg。基线疼痛、过程疼痛和结局疼痛(2周和6个月)采用10cm视觉模拟疼痛评分(VAS)进行测定。通过超声成像确定针头放置的准确性。结果:外侧髌中门静脉与前外侧门静脉的临床结果相当,包括手术疼痛(VAS髌中门静脉:4.6±3.1 cm;前外侧:4.8±3.2 cm;p = 0.77),结果疼痛(VAS髌中:2.6±2.8 cm;前外侧:1.7±2.3 cm;P = 0.11),应答者(髌骨中部:45%;anteriolateral: 56%;P = 0.33),治疗效果持续时间(髌中:3.9±2.4个月;前外侧:4.1±2.2个月;P = 0.69),下一次手术时间(髌中:7.3±3.3个月;前外侧:7.7±3.7个月;P = 0.71)。前外侧门静脉的实时超声成像准确率为97%。结论:改良的前外侧弯曲膝关节门静脉是一种有效、准确、等效的替代标准外侧髌中门静脉进行膝关节关节内注射的方法。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00651625。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信