M.E. Rioja Martín , G. Ortega Pérez , L.J. Cabañas Montero , V. Muñoz-Madero , L. Cabañas Navarro
{"title":"Inyección subareolar: potencial causa de falso negativo en la biopsia selectiva de ganglio centinela en cáncer de mama","authors":"M.E. Rioja Martín , G. Ortega Pérez , L.J. Cabañas Montero , V. Muñoz-Madero , L. Cabañas Navarro","doi":"10.1016/j.remn.2010.07.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Sentinel node biopsy has become the standard practice in lymph node staging in breast cancer in early stages. However, uncertainty remains regarding the best method of radiotracer/dye injection. Currently, the subareolar injection is being widely used because of its technical simplicity and higher rates of SN location versus the so-called deep techniques (peritumoral, intratumoral) that require greater specialization and greater use of resources in the non-palpable lesions.</p><p>We present a case of a discrepancy between the two techniques that could have caused a false negative.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54464,"journal":{"name":"Revista Espanola De Medicina Nuclear","volume":"30 4","pages":"Pages 251-253"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.remn.2010.07.008","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Espanola De Medicina Nuclear","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0212698210002259","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Sentinel node biopsy has become the standard practice in lymph node staging in breast cancer in early stages. However, uncertainty remains regarding the best method of radiotracer/dye injection. Currently, the subareolar injection is being widely used because of its technical simplicity and higher rates of SN location versus the so-called deep techniques (peritumoral, intratumoral) that require greater specialization and greater use of resources in the non-palpable lesions.
We present a case of a discrepancy between the two techniques that could have caused a false negative.