A survey on regenerative surgery performed by Swiss specialists in periodontology with special emphasis on the application of enamel matrix derivatives in infrabony defects.

Ola Schröen, Philipp Sahrmann, Malgorzata Roos, Thomas Attin, Patrick R Schmidlin
{"title":"A survey on regenerative surgery performed by Swiss specialists in periodontology with special emphasis on the application of enamel matrix derivatives in infrabony defects.","authors":"Ola Schröen,&nbsp;Philipp Sahrmann,&nbsp;Malgorzata Roos,&nbsp;Thomas Attin,&nbsp;Patrick R Schmidlin","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This survey aimed to evaluate the common practice of regenerative periodontal surgery with special regard to the use of enamel matrix derivatives (EMD, Emdogain® ) by board-certified specialists in periodontology and non-certified, but active members of the Swiss Society of Periodontology (SSP). A cross-sectional postal survey of 533 dentists, representing all members of the SSP practising in Switzerland, was conducted. The questionnaire consisted of three sections, assessing: 1) general personal information regarding the practice setting and education, 2) general questions regarding periodontal surgery practices and 3) specific questions regarding the use of EMD. The information obtained was compared and differences between specialists and non-specialists were calculated. P-values smaller than 5% were considered significant. Sixty-nine percent of the specialists answered the questionnaire, compared to only 37.4% of the non-specialists (overall: 42.4%). In general, specialists performed surgeries more frequently, and presented a significantly higher percentage of EMD users than the non-specialists. The application guidelines were followed in general. Some differences were observed in application and selection criteria. The subjective perception of clinical success varied greatly among clinicians. Residual pockets were reported to be present in approximately one third of the defects after therapy. In conclusion, this survey revealed that EMD was used on a regular basis by dentists performing periodontal therapy. In addition, the answers by both groups generally corresponded well with the current available literature.</p>","PeriodicalId":74765,"journal":{"name":"Schweizer Monatsschrift fur Zahnmedizin = Revue mensuelle suisse d'odonto-stomatologie = Rivista mensile svizzera di odontologia e stomatologia","volume":"121 2","pages":"136-42"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Schweizer Monatsschrift fur Zahnmedizin = Revue mensuelle suisse d'odonto-stomatologie = Rivista mensile svizzera di odontologia e stomatologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This survey aimed to evaluate the common practice of regenerative periodontal surgery with special regard to the use of enamel matrix derivatives (EMD, Emdogain® ) by board-certified specialists in periodontology and non-certified, but active members of the Swiss Society of Periodontology (SSP). A cross-sectional postal survey of 533 dentists, representing all members of the SSP practising in Switzerland, was conducted. The questionnaire consisted of three sections, assessing: 1) general personal information regarding the practice setting and education, 2) general questions regarding periodontal surgery practices and 3) specific questions regarding the use of EMD. The information obtained was compared and differences between specialists and non-specialists were calculated. P-values smaller than 5% were considered significant. Sixty-nine percent of the specialists answered the questionnaire, compared to only 37.4% of the non-specialists (overall: 42.4%). In general, specialists performed surgeries more frequently, and presented a significantly higher percentage of EMD users than the non-specialists. The application guidelines were followed in general. Some differences were observed in application and selection criteria. The subjective perception of clinical success varied greatly among clinicians. Residual pockets were reported to be present in approximately one third of the defects after therapy. In conclusion, this survey revealed that EMD was used on a regular basis by dentists performing periodontal therapy. In addition, the answers by both groups generally corresponded well with the current available literature.

一项由瑞士牙周病专家进行的再生手术的调查,特别强调牙釉质基质衍生物在骨下缺陷中的应用。
本调查旨在评估再生牙周手术的常见做法,特别是在牙周病专家和非认证的瑞士牙周病学会(SSP)活跃成员使用牙釉质基质衍生物(EMD, Emdogain®)方面。对533名牙医进行了横断面邮政调查,这些牙医代表了在瑞士执业的SSP的所有成员。问卷由三个部分组成,评估:1)关于实践环境和教育的一般个人信息,2)关于牙周外科实践的一般问题,3)关于EMD使用的具体问题。将获得的信息进行比较,并计算专家和非专家之间的差异。p值小于5%被认为显著。69%的专家回答了问卷,相比之下,只有37.4%的非专家回答了问卷(总体:42.4%)。一般来说,专科医生比非专科医生更频繁地进行手术,EMD使用者的比例也明显高于非专科医生。总体上遵循了应用指南。在应用和选择标准上存在一些差异。临床医生对临床成功的主观认知差异很大。据报道,在治疗后大约三分之一的缺陷中存在残余的口袋。综上所述,是次统计调查显示,牙医在进行牙周治疗时,经常使用EMD。此外,两组的答案与当前可用的文献基本吻合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信