Protective and risk factors in amateur equestrians and description of injury patterns: A retrospective data analysis and a case - control survey.

Rebecca M Hasler, Lena Gyssler, Lorin Benneker, Luca Martinolli, Andreas Schötzau, Heinz Zimmermann, Aristomenis K Exadaktylos
{"title":"Protective and risk factors in amateur equestrians and description of injury patterns: A retrospective data analysis and a case - control survey.","authors":"Rebecca M Hasler, Lena Gyssler, Lorin Benneker, Luca Martinolli, Andreas Schötzau, Heinz Zimmermann, Aristomenis K Exadaktylos","doi":"10.1186/1752-2897-5-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In Switzerland there are about 150,000 equestrians. Horse related injuries, including head and spinal injuries, are frequently treated at our level I trauma centre.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To analyse injury patterns, protective factors, and risk factors related to horse riding, and to define groups of safer riders and those at greater risk</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We present a retrospective and a case-control survey at conducted a tertiary trauma centre in Bern, Switzerland.Injured equestrians from July 2000 - June 2006 were retrospectively classified by injury pattern and neurological symptoms. Injured equestrians from July-December 2008 were prospectively collected using a questionnaire with 17 variables. The same questionnaire was applied in non-injured controls. Multiple logistic regression was performed, and combined risk factors were calculated using inference trees.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>RETROSPECTIVE SURVEY: A total of 528 injuries occured in 365 patients. The injury pattern revealed as follows: extremities (32%: upper 17%, lower 15%), head (24%), spine (14%), thorax (9%), face (9%), pelvis (7%) and abdomen (2%). Two injuries were fatal. One case resulted in quadriplegia, one in paraplegia. CASE-CONTROL SURVEY: 61 patients and 102 controls (patients: 72% female, 28% male; controls: 63% female, 37% male) were included. Falls were most frequent (65%), followed by horse kicks (19%) and horse bites (2%). Variables statistically significant for the controls were: Older age (p = 0.015), male gender (p = 0.04) and holding a diploma in horse riding (p = 0.004). Inference trees revealed typical groups less and more likely to suffer injury.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Experience with riding and having passed a diploma in horse riding seem to be protective factors. Educational levels and injury risk should be graded within an educational level-injury risk index.</p>","PeriodicalId":87652,"journal":{"name":"Journal of trauma management & outcomes","volume":"5 ","pages":"4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3042925/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of trauma management & outcomes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/1752-2897-5-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In Switzerland there are about 150,000 equestrians. Horse related injuries, including head and spinal injuries, are frequently treated at our level I trauma centre.

Objectives: To analyse injury patterns, protective factors, and risk factors related to horse riding, and to define groups of safer riders and those at greater risk

Methods: We present a retrospective and a case-control survey at conducted a tertiary trauma centre in Bern, Switzerland.Injured equestrians from July 2000 - June 2006 were retrospectively classified by injury pattern and neurological symptoms. Injured equestrians from July-December 2008 were prospectively collected using a questionnaire with 17 variables. The same questionnaire was applied in non-injured controls. Multiple logistic regression was performed, and combined risk factors were calculated using inference trees.

Results: RETROSPECTIVE SURVEY: A total of 528 injuries occured in 365 patients. The injury pattern revealed as follows: extremities (32%: upper 17%, lower 15%), head (24%), spine (14%), thorax (9%), face (9%), pelvis (7%) and abdomen (2%). Two injuries were fatal. One case resulted in quadriplegia, one in paraplegia. CASE-CONTROL SURVEY: 61 patients and 102 controls (patients: 72% female, 28% male; controls: 63% female, 37% male) were included. Falls were most frequent (65%), followed by horse kicks (19%) and horse bites (2%). Variables statistically significant for the controls were: Older age (p = 0.015), male gender (p = 0.04) and holding a diploma in horse riding (p = 0.004). Inference trees revealed typical groups less and more likely to suffer injury.

Conclusions: Experience with riding and having passed a diploma in horse riding seem to be protective factors. Educational levels and injury risk should be graded within an educational level-injury risk index.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

业余马术运动员的保护因素和风险因素以及受伤模式描述:回顾性数据分析和病例对照调查。
背景介绍瑞士约有 15 万名马术爱好者。与马有关的伤害,包括头部和脊柱受伤,经常在我们的一级创伤中心接受治疗:分析与骑马有关的伤害模式、保护因素和风险因素,并界定较安全骑手和风险较大骑手的群体:我们在瑞士伯尔尼的一家三级创伤中心进行了一项回顾性病例对照调查,根据受伤模式和神经症状对 2000 年 7 月至 2006 年 6 月期间受伤的骑马者进行了回顾性分类。2008 年 7 月至 12 月期间受伤的马术运动员通过一份包含 17 个变量的调查问卷进行了前瞻性收集。同样的问卷也适用于未受伤的对照组。进行了多元逻辑回归,并使用推理树计算了综合风险因素:回顾性调查:结果:回顾性调查:365 名患者共有 528 处受伤。受伤模式如下:四肢(32%:上肢 17%,下肢 15%)、头部(24%)、脊柱(14%)、胸部(9%)、面部(9%)、骨盆(7%)和腹部(2%)。有两例伤者死亡。一例导致四肢瘫痪,一例导致截瘫。病例对照调查:61 名患者和 102 名对照者(患者:72% 女性,28% 男性;对照者:63% 女性,37% 男性)被纳入调查范围。跌倒最为常见(65%),其次是马踢(19%)和马咬(2%)。对对照组具有统计学意义的变量有年龄较大(p = 0.015)、男性(p = 0.04)和持有骑马文凭(p = 0.004)。推理树显示了典型的受伤几率较低和较高的群体:结论:骑马经验和骑马文凭似乎是保护因素。教育水平和受伤风险应根据教育水平-受伤风险指数进行分级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书