Interventions for enhancing medication compliance/adherence with benefits in treatment outcomes.

GMS health technology assessment Pub Date : 2008-02-19
Vitali Gorenoi, Matthias P Schönermark, Anja Hagen
{"title":"Interventions for enhancing medication compliance/adherence with benefits in treatment outcomes.","authors":"Vitali Gorenoi,&nbsp;Matthias P Schönermark,&nbsp;Anja Hagen","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Scientific background: </strong>Poor compliance or adherence in drug therapy can cause increased morbidity, mortality and enormous costs in the healthcare system (in Germany annually approximately 10 billion euros). Different methods are used for enhancing the compliance or adherence.</p><p><strong>Research questions: </strong>The evaluation addresses the questions about existence, efficacy, cost-benefit relation as well as ethical-social and juridical implications of strategies for enhancing compliance or adherence in drug therapy with concomitant improvements in treatment outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature search was conducted in the medical, also health economic relevant, literature databases in January 2007, beginning from 2002. Systematic reviews on the basis of (randomised controlled trials (RCT) concerning interventions to enhance compliance or adherence with regard to treatment outcomes as well as systematic reviews of health economic analyses were included in the evaluation. Additionally, it was also searched for publications which primarily considered ethical-social and juridical aspects of these interventions for the German context.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One systematic review with data for 57 RCT was included in the medical evaluation and one systematic review with data for six studies into the health economic evaluation. No publication primary concerning ethical-social or juridical implications could be identified. A significant positive effect on the treatment outcome was reported for 22 evaluated interventions. For many interventions the results can be classified as reliable: counseling with providing an information leaflet and compliance diary chart followed by phone consultation for helicobacter pylori positive patients, repeated counseling for patients with acute asthma symptoms, telephone calls to establish the level of compliance and to make recommendations based on that for the therapy of cardiovascular diseases, calls of an automated telephone system with phone counseling in problem cases for diabetics, different family based interventions including repeated family counseling, education and \"culturally modified family therapy\" in patients with schizophrenia, repeated \"compliance therapy\" sessions for patients with acute psychosis. For other interventions the results should be viewed with more concern (because of the poor methodical quality of the underlying studies). The effect size of the interventions can not be estimated from the available data. From the available data, no reliable results can be provided concerning the cost-benefit relation of these strategies.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Many of the reported studies had a poor reporting and methodological quality. The reliability of the conclusions of the studies is restricted because of methodical shortcomings. Efficacy and cost estimates determined in the health economic studies are not transferable to the current situation in Germany. It has been discussed recently that the compliance or adherence enhancing interventions can restrict the autonomy and the privacy of the patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In drug therapy some compliance or adherence enhancing interventions with concomitant positive effect on the treatment outcome may be used. The cost-benefit relation of these interventions is to be estimated. Using these interventions the patient's autonomy and privacy are to be restricted as few as possible.</p>","PeriodicalId":89142,"journal":{"name":"GMS health technology assessment","volume":"3 ","pages":"Doc14"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/cc/da/HTA-03-14.PMC3011336.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GMS health technology assessment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Scientific background: Poor compliance or adherence in drug therapy can cause increased morbidity, mortality and enormous costs in the healthcare system (in Germany annually approximately 10 billion euros). Different methods are used for enhancing the compliance or adherence.

Research questions: The evaluation addresses the questions about existence, efficacy, cost-benefit relation as well as ethical-social and juridical implications of strategies for enhancing compliance or adherence in drug therapy with concomitant improvements in treatment outcomes.

Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted in the medical, also health economic relevant, literature databases in January 2007, beginning from 2002. Systematic reviews on the basis of (randomised controlled trials (RCT) concerning interventions to enhance compliance or adherence with regard to treatment outcomes as well as systematic reviews of health economic analyses were included in the evaluation. Additionally, it was also searched for publications which primarily considered ethical-social and juridical aspects of these interventions for the German context.

Results: One systematic review with data for 57 RCT was included in the medical evaluation and one systematic review with data for six studies into the health economic evaluation. No publication primary concerning ethical-social or juridical implications could be identified. A significant positive effect on the treatment outcome was reported for 22 evaluated interventions. For many interventions the results can be classified as reliable: counseling with providing an information leaflet and compliance diary chart followed by phone consultation for helicobacter pylori positive patients, repeated counseling for patients with acute asthma symptoms, telephone calls to establish the level of compliance and to make recommendations based on that for the therapy of cardiovascular diseases, calls of an automated telephone system with phone counseling in problem cases for diabetics, different family based interventions including repeated family counseling, education and "culturally modified family therapy" in patients with schizophrenia, repeated "compliance therapy" sessions for patients with acute psychosis. For other interventions the results should be viewed with more concern (because of the poor methodical quality of the underlying studies). The effect size of the interventions can not be estimated from the available data. From the available data, no reliable results can be provided concerning the cost-benefit relation of these strategies.

Discussion: Many of the reported studies had a poor reporting and methodological quality. The reliability of the conclusions of the studies is restricted because of methodical shortcomings. Efficacy and cost estimates determined in the health economic studies are not transferable to the current situation in Germany. It has been discussed recently that the compliance or adherence enhancing interventions can restrict the autonomy and the privacy of the patients.

Conclusions: In drug therapy some compliance or adherence enhancing interventions with concomitant positive effect on the treatment outcome may be used. The cost-benefit relation of these interventions is to be estimated. Using these interventions the patient's autonomy and privacy are to be restricted as few as possible.

加强药物依从性/依从性的干预措施有利于治疗结果。
科学背景:药物治疗依从性差或依从性差会导致发病率、死亡率增加,并在医疗保健系统中造成巨大的成本(在德国每年约100亿欧元)。不同的方法用于增强依从性或依从性。研究问题:评估解决了关于存在、有效性、成本-收益关系以及伦理-社会和法律意义的问题,以提高药物治疗的依从性或依从性,同时改善治疗结果。方法:从2002年开始,系统检索2007年1月的医学及卫生经济学相关文献数据库。评价包括基于随机对照试验(RCT)的系统评价,涉及提高治疗结果依从性或依从性的干预措施,以及卫生经济分析的系统评价。此外,还检索了主要考虑这些干预措施在德国背景下的伦理-社会和法律方面的出版物。结果:医学评价纳入了一篇系统综述,纳入了57项随机对照试验的数据;健康经济学评价纳入了一篇系统综述,纳入了6项研究的数据。无法确定涉及伦理-社会或法律影响的出版物。据报道,22项评估干预措施对治疗结果有显著的积极影响。对于许多干预措施,其结果可归为可靠:提供信息单张和依从性日记表,然后对幽门螺杆菌阳性患者进行电话咨询,对有急性哮喘症状的患者进行反复咨询,通过电话确定依从性水平并在此基础上对心血管疾病的治疗提出建议,在糖尿病患者的问题病例中拨打自动电话系统进行电话咨询,不同的以家庭为基础的干预措施,包括对精神分裂症患者反复进行家庭咨询、教育和“文化改良家庭治疗”,对急性精神病患者反复进行“依从性治疗”。对于其他干预措施的结果应该更关注(因为基础研究的系统质量较差)。干预措施的效果大小不能从现有的数据估计。从现有的数据来看,这些策略的成本效益关系并没有可靠的结果。讨论:许多报告的研究报告和方法质量都很差。由于方法上的缺陷,研究结论的可靠性受到限制。在卫生经济学研究中确定的疗效和成本估计不能转移到德国的当前情况。最近有讨论认为依从性或依从性增强干预会限制患者的自主权和隐私。结论:在药物治疗中,可以采用一些增强依从性或依从性的干预措施,同时对治疗结果有积极的影响。这些干预措施的成本效益关系有待估计。使用这些干预措施,患者的自主权和隐私应尽可能少地受到限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信