Long latency auditory evoked potentials in children with phonological disorder.

Renata Aparecida Leite, Haydée Fiszbein Wertzner, Carla Gentile Matas
{"title":"Long latency auditory evoked potentials in children with phonological disorder.","authors":"Renata Aparecida Leite,&nbsp;Haydée Fiszbein Wertzner,&nbsp;Carla Gentile Matas","doi":"10.1590/s0104-56872010000400034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Auditory evoked potentials in children with phonological disorder.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To characterize the long latency auditory evoked potentials (LLAEP) results N1, P2, N2 and P300 of children with phonological disorder and to verify the improvement of such potentials with speech therapy.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>25 children without phonological disorder (control group) and 41 with phonological disorder (study group) underwent a basic audiological evaluation and LLAEP. The study group was divided into two subgroups: subgroup A composed by 22 children, underwent 12 sessions of speech therapy and were submitted to audiological retesting after this period, and subgroup B composed by 19 children, who were also reassessed three months after the initial testing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Statistically significant differences between groups for the P2 and P300 latencies and P300 amplitude were observed. Comparison between the first and the second audiological assessments indicated no significant statistical differences between both subgroups regarding wave latencies. However, a significant statistical difference was verified for the P300 (study subgroup A) and P2/N2 (study subgroup B) wave amplitudes. The study group presented higher percentage of altered results in the P300; wave latency increase was the most frequent type of alteration. After speech therapy, the results of all components improved, however, there was no association between the improvement of LLAEP results with the background of otitis, as well as with the Percentage of Consonants Correct-Revised.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Children with phonological disorder present altered P300 suggesting involvement of the central auditory pathway, probably due to alterations in the auditory processing, presenting improvement in all components of LLAEP results after speech therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":74581,"journal":{"name":"Pro-fono : revista de atualizacao cientifica","volume":"22 4","pages":"561-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1590/s0104-56872010000400034","citationCount":"22","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pro-fono : revista de atualizacao cientifica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/s0104-56872010000400034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

Abstract

Background: Auditory evoked potentials in children with phonological disorder.

Aim: To characterize the long latency auditory evoked potentials (LLAEP) results N1, P2, N2 and P300 of children with phonological disorder and to verify the improvement of such potentials with speech therapy.

Method: 25 children without phonological disorder (control group) and 41 with phonological disorder (study group) underwent a basic audiological evaluation and LLAEP. The study group was divided into two subgroups: subgroup A composed by 22 children, underwent 12 sessions of speech therapy and were submitted to audiological retesting after this period, and subgroup B composed by 19 children, who were also reassessed three months after the initial testing.

Results: Statistically significant differences between groups for the P2 and P300 latencies and P300 amplitude were observed. Comparison between the first and the second audiological assessments indicated no significant statistical differences between both subgroups regarding wave latencies. However, a significant statistical difference was verified for the P300 (study subgroup A) and P2/N2 (study subgroup B) wave amplitudes. The study group presented higher percentage of altered results in the P300; wave latency increase was the most frequent type of alteration. After speech therapy, the results of all components improved, however, there was no association between the improvement of LLAEP results with the background of otitis, as well as with the Percentage of Consonants Correct-Revised.

Conclusion: Children with phonological disorder present altered P300 suggesting involvement of the central auditory pathway, probably due to alterations in the auditory processing, presenting improvement in all components of LLAEP results after speech therapy.

语音障碍儿童的长潜伏期听觉诱发电位。
背景:儿童语音障碍的听觉诱发电位。目的:观察语音障碍儿童长潜伏期听觉诱发电位(LLAEP) N1、P2、N2和P300的特征,并验证言语治疗对这些电位的改善作用。方法:对25例无语音障碍儿童(对照组)和41例有语音障碍儿童(研究组)进行基本听力学评估和LLAEP。研究小组分为两组:A组有22名儿童,接受了12次语言治疗,并在此期间接受了听力学重新测试;B组有19名儿童,在首次测试后3个月再次接受评估。结果:两组间P2、P300潜伏期及P300振幅差异有统计学意义。第一次和第二次听力学评估的比较表明,两个亚组在波潜伏期方面没有显著的统计学差异。然而,P300(研究亚组a)和P2/N2(研究亚组B)的波幅有显著的统计学差异。研究组在P300中表现出更高百分比的改变结果;波潜伏期增加是最常见的变化类型。言语治疗后,所有成分的结果都有所改善,然而,LLAEP结果的改善与中耳炎背景以及正确修改辅音百分比之间没有关联。结论:语音障碍儿童的P300发生改变,表明中枢听觉通路受到影响,可能是由于听觉加工的改变,言语治疗后LLAEP的所有成分都有所改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信