Social selection and the evolution of cooperative groups: the example of the cellular slime moulds.

IF 1.4
Vidyanand Nanjundiah, Santosh Sathe
{"title":"Social selection and the evolution of cooperative groups: the example of the cellular slime moulds.","authors":"Vidyanand Nanjundiah,&nbsp;Santosh Sathe","doi":"10.1039/c0ib00115e","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In social selection the phenotype of an individual depends on its own genotype as well as on the phenotypes, and so genotypes, of other individuals. This makes it impossible to associate an invariant phenotype with a genotype: the social context is crucial. Descriptions of metazoan development, which often is viewed as the acme of cooperative social behaviour, ignore or downplay this fact. The implicit justification for doing so is based on a group-selectionist point of view. Namely, embryos are clones, therefore all cells have the same evolutionary interest, and the visible differences between cells result from a common strategy. The reasoning is flawed, because phenotypic heterogeneity within groups can result from contingent choices made by cells from a flexible repertoire as in multicellular development. What makes that possible is phenotypic plasticity, namely the ability of a genotype to exhibit different phenotypes. However, co-operative social behaviour with division of labour requires that different phenotypes interact appropriately, not that they belong to the same genotype, or have overlapping genetic interests. We sketch a possible route to the evolution of social groups that involves many steps: (a) individuals that happen to be in spatial proximity benefit simply by virtue of their number; (b) traits that are already present act as preadaptations and improve the efficiency of the group; and (c) new adaptations evolve under selection in the social context--that is, via interactions between individuals--and further strengthen group behaviour. The Dictyostelid or cellular slime mould amoebae (CSMs) become multicellular in an unusual way, by the aggregation of free-living cells. In nature the resulting group can be genetically homogeneous (clonal) or heterogeneous (polyclonal); in either case its development, which displays strong cooperation between cells (to the extent of so-called altruism) is not affected. This makes the CSMs exemplars for the study of social behaviour.</p>","PeriodicalId":520649,"journal":{"name":"Integrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro","volume":" ","pages":"329-42"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2011-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1039/c0ib00115e","citationCount":"23","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Integrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1039/c0ib00115e","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2011/1/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

Abstract

In social selection the phenotype of an individual depends on its own genotype as well as on the phenotypes, and so genotypes, of other individuals. This makes it impossible to associate an invariant phenotype with a genotype: the social context is crucial. Descriptions of metazoan development, which often is viewed as the acme of cooperative social behaviour, ignore or downplay this fact. The implicit justification for doing so is based on a group-selectionist point of view. Namely, embryos are clones, therefore all cells have the same evolutionary interest, and the visible differences between cells result from a common strategy. The reasoning is flawed, because phenotypic heterogeneity within groups can result from contingent choices made by cells from a flexible repertoire as in multicellular development. What makes that possible is phenotypic plasticity, namely the ability of a genotype to exhibit different phenotypes. However, co-operative social behaviour with division of labour requires that different phenotypes interact appropriately, not that they belong to the same genotype, or have overlapping genetic interests. We sketch a possible route to the evolution of social groups that involves many steps: (a) individuals that happen to be in spatial proximity benefit simply by virtue of their number; (b) traits that are already present act as preadaptations and improve the efficiency of the group; and (c) new adaptations evolve under selection in the social context--that is, via interactions between individuals--and further strengthen group behaviour. The Dictyostelid or cellular slime mould amoebae (CSMs) become multicellular in an unusual way, by the aggregation of free-living cells. In nature the resulting group can be genetically homogeneous (clonal) or heterogeneous (polyclonal); in either case its development, which displays strong cooperation between cells (to the extent of so-called altruism) is not affected. This makes the CSMs exemplars for the study of social behaviour.

社会选择与合作群体的进化:以细胞黏菌为例。
在社会选择中,个体的表现型取决于自身的基因型,也取决于其他个体的表现型和基因型。这使得不可能将不变的表型与基因型联系起来:社会环境是至关重要的。后生动物的发展通常被视为合作社会行为的顶点,但对它的描述却忽视或淡化了这一事实。这样做的隐含理由是基于群体选择主义的观点。也就是说,胚胎是克隆的,因此所有的细胞都有相同的进化利益,细胞之间可见的差异是由共同的策略造成的。这种推理是有缺陷的,因为群体内的表型异质性可能是多细胞发育中灵活的细胞偶然选择的结果。使其成为可能的是表型可塑性,即基因型表现出不同表型的能力。然而,具有劳动分工的合作社会行为要求不同的表现型适当地相互作用,而不是要求它们属于相同的基因型,或者具有重叠的遗传利益。我们描绘了一条可能的社会群体进化之路,它涉及许多步骤:(a)恰好处于空间邻近的个体仅仅由于其数量而受益;(b)已经存在的性状作为预适应并提高群体的效率;(c)新的适应在社会环境的选择下进化——也就是说,通过个体之间的相互作用——并进一步加强群体行为。盘基骨类或细胞黏菌变形虫(csm)通过自由活细胞的聚集,以一种不寻常的方式变成多细胞。在本质上,所得群体可以是基因同质(克隆)或异质(多克隆);在任何一种情况下,它的发育都不会受到影响,细胞之间表现出强烈的合作(达到所谓的利他主义的程度)。这使得csm成为社会行为研究的典范。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信