[Current status of external quality assessment of fecal occult blood test].

Soo Jin Yoo, Young Joo Cha, Won-Ki Min, You Kyoung Lee, Seok-Lae Chae, Bo-Moon Shin, Hwan Sub Lim
{"title":"[Current status of external quality assessment of fecal occult blood test].","authors":"Soo Jin Yoo,&nbsp;Young Joo Cha,&nbsp;Won-Ki Min,&nbsp;You Kyoung Lee,&nbsp;Seok-Lae Chae,&nbsp;Bo-Moon Shin,&nbsp;Hwan Sub Lim","doi":"10.3343/kjlm.2010.30.6.726","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nationwide external quality assessment (EQA) of the fecal occult blood test (FOBT) in Korea was first introduced in 2007-2009. The EQA results were analyzed to assess the current status of FOBT and to plan the continuation of the EQA program.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The surveys included 40 hospitals in the preliminary survey conducted in 2007, 249 general hospitals in 2008, and 389 hospitals in 2009. In the surveys, the participating hospitals provided the results of the distributed materials and replies to the questionnaire on the FOBT test procedures and quality controls.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the surveys conducted between 2007 and 2009, a total of 650 institutes submitted 653 test system results; 3 institutes used 2 kinds of methods. All of the institutes used immunologic methods; 107 institutes (16.5%) used quantitative equipments and 546 institutes (84.0%) used qualitative kits. Most quantitative tests yielded consistent positive or negative results; however, their cut-off and measured values differed according to the equipments used. A low-level material tested in 2007 was negative in the quantitative methods but positive in some qualitative methods because of lower detection limits. The discordance rates among quantitative tests were 3.2% in 2007, 4.4% in 2008, and 0% in 2009 and the rates among qualitative tests were 13.8% in 2008 and 2.6% in 2009. Semi-solid EQA materials showed the ability to evaluate the overall test procedures with acceptable stability.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In the first Korean FOBT EQA, commercially available EQA materials were proven to be stable. Continuation of the EQA program and further education of laboratory personnel are needed to reduce inconsistency in results. Further, the test kit, procedures, and result reports must be standardized.</p>","PeriodicalId":17890,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Laboratory Medicine","volume":"30 6","pages":"726-33"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Laboratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3343/kjlm.2010.30.6.726","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Nationwide external quality assessment (EQA) of the fecal occult blood test (FOBT) in Korea was first introduced in 2007-2009. The EQA results were analyzed to assess the current status of FOBT and to plan the continuation of the EQA program.

Methods: The surveys included 40 hospitals in the preliminary survey conducted in 2007, 249 general hospitals in 2008, and 389 hospitals in 2009. In the surveys, the participating hospitals provided the results of the distributed materials and replies to the questionnaire on the FOBT test procedures and quality controls.

Results: In the surveys conducted between 2007 and 2009, a total of 650 institutes submitted 653 test system results; 3 institutes used 2 kinds of methods. All of the institutes used immunologic methods; 107 institutes (16.5%) used quantitative equipments and 546 institutes (84.0%) used qualitative kits. Most quantitative tests yielded consistent positive or negative results; however, their cut-off and measured values differed according to the equipments used. A low-level material tested in 2007 was negative in the quantitative methods but positive in some qualitative methods because of lower detection limits. The discordance rates among quantitative tests were 3.2% in 2007, 4.4% in 2008, and 0% in 2009 and the rates among qualitative tests were 13.8% in 2008 and 2.6% in 2009. Semi-solid EQA materials showed the ability to evaluate the overall test procedures with acceptable stability.

Conclusions: In the first Korean FOBT EQA, commercially available EQA materials were proven to be stable. Continuation of the EQA program and further education of laboratory personnel are needed to reduce inconsistency in results. Further, the test kit, procedures, and result reports must be standardized.

【粪便潜血检查外部质量评价现状】。
背景:韩国于2007-2009年首次引入了粪便隐血检查(FOBT)的全国外部质量评估(EQA)。对EQA结果进行分析,以评估FOBT的现状,并计划EQA项目的继续。方法:2007年初步调查40家医院,2008年调查249家综合医院,2009年调查389家医院。在调查中,参与的医院提供了分发材料的结果,并答复了关于FOBT测试程序和质量控制的问卷。结果:在2007年至2009年进行的调查中,共有650所研究所提交了653项测试系统结果;3所研究所采用了2种方法。所有的研究机构都采用了免疫学方法;使用定量设备的有107所(16.5%),使用定性试剂盒的有546所(84.0%)。大多数定量测试产生一致的阳性或阴性结果;然而,它们的截止值和测量值根据所使用的设备而不同。2007年检测的一种低浓度物质由于检出限较低,在定量方法上呈阴性,但在部分定性方法上呈阳性。定量检验的不一致率分别为2007年3.2%、2008年4.4%和2009年0%,定性检验的不一致率分别为2008年13.8%和2009年2.6%。半固态EQA材料显示出在可接受的稳定性下评估整体测试程序的能力。结论:在第一个韩国FOBT EQA中,市售EQA材料被证明是稳定的。EQA项目的延续和实验室人员的进一步教育是减少结果不一致的必要条件。此外,测试工具、程序和结果报告必须标准化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Korean Journal of Laboratory Medicine
Korean Journal of Laboratory Medicine 医学-医学实验技术
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
>12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信