Neurocognitive differences between drivers with type 1 diabetes with and without a recent history of recurrent driving mishaps

Laura K. Campbell, Linda A. Gonder-Frederick, Donna K. Broshek, Boris P. Kovatchev, Stacey Anderson, William L. Clarke, Daniel J. Cox
{"title":"Neurocognitive differences between drivers with type 1 diabetes with and without a recent history of recurrent driving mishaps","authors":"Laura K. Campbell,&nbsp;Linda A. Gonder-Frederick,&nbsp;Donna K. Broshek,&nbsp;Boris P. Kovatchev,&nbsp;Stacey Anderson,&nbsp;William L. Clarke,&nbsp;Daniel J. Cox","doi":"10.1016/j.ijdm.2010.05.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>A subset of drivers with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) may be at significant risk for hypoglycemia-related driving collisions and moving vehicle violations due to acute and chronic neurocognitive impairment. The present study compared drivers with T1DM with and without a recent history of multiple driving mishaps on a neurocognitive battery during euglycemia, progressive mild hypoglycemia, and recovery from hypoglycemia, to determine whether neurocognitive measures differentiate the two risk groups. We hypothesized that drivers with a history of multiple recent hypoglycemia-related driving mishaps would demonstrate greater psychomotor slowing, both during hypoglycemia and euglycemia.</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>Participants were 42 adults with T1DM and were assigned to one of two groups: those reporting no driving mishaps in the last year (−History) and those reporting two or more (+History). Neurocognitive testing was conducted before and repeated during a hyper-insulinemic clamping procedure.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Not surprisingly, all drivers demonstrated a decrease in functioning across all neurocognitive tasks during hypoglycemia. However, in contrast to the common belief that neurocognitive functions return slowly and gradually following hypoglycemia, baseline neurocognitive functioning immediately recovered upon return of BG to euglycemia for all subjects. Between-group analyses revealed that subjects with a recent history of driving mishaps consistently demonstrated poorer performance on tasks measuring working memory.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Working memory is a potential neurocognitive indicator that may help differentiate adults with T1DM with and without a history of driving mishaps, predict future risk for driving mishaps, and provide targeted intervention programs to address this critical public health issue.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":89155,"journal":{"name":"International journal of diabetes mellitus","volume":"2 2","pages":"Pages 73-77"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.ijdm.2010.05.014","citationCount":"24","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of diabetes mellitus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877593410000366","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2010/6/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24

Abstract

Objective

A subset of drivers with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) may be at significant risk for hypoglycemia-related driving collisions and moving vehicle violations due to acute and chronic neurocognitive impairment. The present study compared drivers with T1DM with and without a recent history of multiple driving mishaps on a neurocognitive battery during euglycemia, progressive mild hypoglycemia, and recovery from hypoglycemia, to determine whether neurocognitive measures differentiate the two risk groups. We hypothesized that drivers with a history of multiple recent hypoglycemia-related driving mishaps would demonstrate greater psychomotor slowing, both during hypoglycemia and euglycemia.

Study design

Participants were 42 adults with T1DM and were assigned to one of two groups: those reporting no driving mishaps in the last year (−History) and those reporting two or more (+History). Neurocognitive testing was conducted before and repeated during a hyper-insulinemic clamping procedure.

Results

Not surprisingly, all drivers demonstrated a decrease in functioning across all neurocognitive tasks during hypoglycemia. However, in contrast to the common belief that neurocognitive functions return slowly and gradually following hypoglycemia, baseline neurocognitive functioning immediately recovered upon return of BG to euglycemia for all subjects. Between-group analyses revealed that subjects with a recent history of driving mishaps consistently demonstrated poorer performance on tasks measuring working memory.

Conclusion

Working memory is a potential neurocognitive indicator that may help differentiate adults with T1DM with and without a history of driving mishaps, predict future risk for driving mishaps, and provide targeted intervention programs to address this critical public health issue.

Abstract Image

1型糖尿病驾驶员的神经认知差异,有无近期复发驾驶事故史
目的:一部分1型糖尿病(T1DM)驾驶员由于急性和慢性神经认知障碍,可能具有低血糖相关驾驶碰撞和移动车辆违规的显著风险。本研究比较了有和没有近期多次驾驶事故史的T1DM驾驶员在血糖正常、进行性轻度低血糖和低血糖恢复期间的神经认知电池,以确定神经认知测量是否能区分这两个危险组。我们假设,近期有多次低血糖相关驾驶事故史的司机在低血糖和高血糖期间都会表现出更大的精神运动减慢。研究设计参与者是42名患有T1DM的成年人,他们被分为两组:一组在过去一年中没有发生驾驶事故(-历史),另一组报告两次或两次以上(+历史)。神经认知测试在高胰岛素钳夹手术之前和期间进行。结果:在低血糖期间,所有司机的神经认知功能都有所下降,这并不奇怪。然而,与通常认为低血糖后神经认知功能恢复缓慢而逐渐相反,基线神经认知功能在所有受试者的BG恢复到正常血糖后立即恢复。组间分析显示,最近有驾驶事故史的受试者在工作记忆测试任务中的表现一直较差。结论工作记忆是一种潜在的神经认知指标,可以帮助区分有或没有驾驶事故史的T1DM成人,预测未来驾驶事故的风险,并提供有针对性的干预方案,以解决这一关键的公共卫生问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书