English Language Teaching: phonetics, phonology and auditory processing contributions.

Letícia Maria Martins Araújo, Mariza Ribeiro Feniman, Fernanda Ribeiro Pinto de Carvalho, Simone Aparecida Lopes-Herrera
{"title":"English Language Teaching: phonetics, phonology and auditory processing contributions.","authors":"Letícia Maria Martins Araújo,&nbsp;Mariza Ribeiro Feniman,&nbsp;Fernanda Ribeiro Pinto de Carvalho,&nbsp;Simone Aparecida Lopes-Herrera","doi":"10.1590/s0104-56872010000300005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>interrelation of phonetics, phonology and auditory processing in English Language Teaching.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>to determine whether prior contact with English phonetics favors general learning of this language (L2), i.e. second language, in Portuguese speakers; to verify performance of these individuals in an auditory processing test prior to and after being taught L2.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>participants of the study were eight college students who had only studied English in high school. These participants were divided into two groups: control group - were only enrolled in English classes; experimental group - were enrolled in English phonetic classes prior to their enrollment in English classes. Participants were submitted to an auditory processing test and to an oral test in English (Oral Test) prior to and after the classes. Data were analyzed in the same way, i.e. prior to and after the classes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>these were expressed statistically by T-Student's test. Analyses indicated no difference in performance between groups. Scores indicated better performance of the control group for answering questions in English in the Oral Test. The experimental group had better performance in the auditory processing test after being enrolled to English phonetic classes and English course.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>prior basic knowledge of English did not enhance general learning (improvement in pronunciation) of the second language, however, it improved the ability of temporal processing in the used test.</p>","PeriodicalId":74581,"journal":{"name":"Pro-fono : revista de atualizacao cientifica","volume":"22 3","pages":"183-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1590/s0104-56872010000300005","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pro-fono : revista de atualizacao cientifica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/s0104-56872010000300005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background: interrelation of phonetics, phonology and auditory processing in English Language Teaching.

Aim: to determine whether prior contact with English phonetics favors general learning of this language (L2), i.e. second language, in Portuguese speakers; to verify performance of these individuals in an auditory processing test prior to and after being taught L2.

Method: participants of the study were eight college students who had only studied English in high school. These participants were divided into two groups: control group - were only enrolled in English classes; experimental group - were enrolled in English phonetic classes prior to their enrollment in English classes. Participants were submitted to an auditory processing test and to an oral test in English (Oral Test) prior to and after the classes. Data were analyzed in the same way, i.e. prior to and after the classes.

Results: these were expressed statistically by T-Student's test. Analyses indicated no difference in performance between groups. Scores indicated better performance of the control group for answering questions in English in the Oral Test. The experimental group had better performance in the auditory processing test after being enrolled to English phonetic classes and English course.

Conclusion: prior basic knowledge of English did not enhance general learning (improvement in pronunciation) of the second language, however, it improved the ability of temporal processing in the used test.

英语教学:语音学、音韵学和听觉加工的贡献。
背景:语音、音系和听觉加工在英语教学中的相互关系。目的:确定葡萄牙语使用者事先接触英语语音是否有利于该语言(L2),即第二语言的一般学习;来验证这些人在学习第二语言之前和之后的听觉处理测试中的表现。方法:研究对象为8名仅在高中学习过英语的大学生。这些参与者被分为两组:对照组——只参加英语课程;实验组在入组前先入组英语语音班。在课前和课后,参与者分别接受了听力处理测试和英语口语测试(口语测试)。数据的分析方法相同,即课前和课后。结果:经T-Student检验有统计学意义。分析表明,两组之间的表现没有差异。在口语测试中,分数表明对照组在回答英语问题方面表现更好。实验组在参加英语语音班和英语课程后,在听觉加工测试中表现较好。结论:先前的英语基础知识并没有促进第二语言的一般学习(发音的改善),但它提高了使用测试中的时间加工能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信