Visual evoked potential abnormalities in migraine patients.

E Boylu, F M Domaç, A Koçer, Z Unal, T Tanridağ, O Us
{"title":"Visual evoked potential abnormalities in migraine patients.","authors":"E Boylu,&nbsp;F M Domaç,&nbsp;A Koçer,&nbsp;Z Unal,&nbsp;T Tanridağ,&nbsp;O Us","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Visual processing in migraine has been targeted indicating that the visual pathways are involved in the migraine pathophysiology. We aimed to assess the nature of visual evoked potential (VEP) changes in migraine patients and to evaluate the role of VEP in the diagnosis of migraine.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We examined 31 female and 10 male patients with a migraine headache diagnosis according to the criteria of the International Headache Society. Control subjects had neither migraine and other types of primary headache nor familial history. VEP were elicited using a checkerboard by monocular and binocular pattern reversal stimulation. The latencies of N75, P100 and N145 and peak-to-peak amplitude of N75-P100 were measured. We compared VEP latencies and amplitudes of the monocular and binocular stimulation within each population.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The N75 and P100 latencies were found to be significantly longer in the study group than the control group (p = 0.014 and p = 0.034, respectively) while the amplitudes in the study group were lower (p = 0.014). N145 latency was found to be longer in patients with longer duration of disease (p < 0.05). P100 latency was found to be significantly longer in patients with aura than the patients without aura (p = 0.029). N75 latency, recorded by left monocular stimulation, was elongated and the amplitude was diminished with left hemicranial headache.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Measurement of VEP latency and amplitude is a valuable and reliable test for the diagnosis of migraine. Our results reflect a persisting dysfunction of precortical visual processing which might be relevant in the pathogenesis of migraine.</p>","PeriodicalId":11591,"journal":{"name":"Electromyography and clinical neurophysiology","volume":"50 6","pages":"303-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electromyography and clinical neurophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Visual processing in migraine has been targeted indicating that the visual pathways are involved in the migraine pathophysiology. We aimed to assess the nature of visual evoked potential (VEP) changes in migraine patients and to evaluate the role of VEP in the diagnosis of migraine.

Materials and methods: We examined 31 female and 10 male patients with a migraine headache diagnosis according to the criteria of the International Headache Society. Control subjects had neither migraine and other types of primary headache nor familial history. VEP were elicited using a checkerboard by monocular and binocular pattern reversal stimulation. The latencies of N75, P100 and N145 and peak-to-peak amplitude of N75-P100 were measured. We compared VEP latencies and amplitudes of the monocular and binocular stimulation within each population.

Results: The N75 and P100 latencies were found to be significantly longer in the study group than the control group (p = 0.014 and p = 0.034, respectively) while the amplitudes in the study group were lower (p = 0.014). N145 latency was found to be longer in patients with longer duration of disease (p < 0.05). P100 latency was found to be significantly longer in patients with aura than the patients without aura (p = 0.029). N75 latency, recorded by left monocular stimulation, was elongated and the amplitude was diminished with left hemicranial headache.

Conclusion: Measurement of VEP latency and amplitude is a valuable and reliable test for the diagnosis of migraine. Our results reflect a persisting dysfunction of precortical visual processing which might be relevant in the pathogenesis of migraine.

偏头痛患者的视觉诱发电位异常。
背景:偏头痛的视觉加工已成为研究的目标,表明视觉通路参与了偏头痛的病理生理。我们的目的是评估偏头痛患者的视觉诱发电位(VEP)变化的性质,并评估VEP在偏头痛诊断中的作用。材料和方法:根据国际头痛学会的标准,我们检查了31名女性和10名男性偏头痛患者。对照组没有偏头痛和其他类型的原发性头痛,也没有家族史。采用棋盘法,通过单眼和双眼模式反转刺激诱发VEP。测定N75、P100、N145的潜伏期和N75-P100的峰间振幅。我们比较了每个人群中单眼和双眼刺激的VEP潜伏期和振幅。结果:实验组的N75和P100潜伏期明显长于对照组(p = 0.014和p = 0.034),而实验组的振幅明显低于对照组(p = 0.014)。病程越长,N145潜伏期越长(p < 0.05)。有先兆者P100潜伏期明显长于无先兆者(p = 0.029)。左侧单眼刺激记录的N75潜伏期在左半颅头痛时延长,幅度减小。结论:测量VEP潜伏期和振幅是诊断偏头痛的一种有价值和可靠的方法。我们的结果反映了一种持续的皮质前视觉处理功能障碍,这可能与偏头痛的发病机制有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信