Comparison of the sensitivities of plantar nerve conduction techniques for early detection of diabetic sensory polyneuropathy.

S Hemmi, K Inoue, T Murakami, Y Sunada
{"title":"Comparison of the sensitivities of plantar nerve conduction techniques for early detection of diabetic sensory polyneuropathy.","authors":"S Hemmi,&nbsp;K Inoue,&nbsp;T Murakami,&nbsp;Y Sunada","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this study was to determine the most sensitive diagnostic test for nerve conduction study (NCS) of the foot for early detection of diabetic polyneuropathy. We compared the sensitivities for diagnosis of sensory polyneuropathy of four different nerve conduction techniques in the same nerves: nerve conduction studies of the medial plantar nerve with surface electrodes using three different techniques and a nerve conduction study of the digital and interdigital nerves of the foot using a near-nerve needle technique. In 25 patients with diabetic polyneuropathy with normal routine NCS, diagnosis of sensory neuropathy was confirmed by medial plantar NCS in 5 patients (20.0%) using Guiloff's method, in 5 patients (20.0%) using Ponsford's method and in 9 patients (36.0%) using Hemmi's method. In digital and interdigital NCS of the foot, a definite neuropathy pattern was observed in 15 patients (60.0%). The most common abnormality was low amplitude of sensory nerve action potential, indicating axonal degeneration. This study demonstrated that digital and interdigital NCS using the near-nerve needle technique is a more sensitive method for detection of early-stage diabetic polyneuropathy.</p>","PeriodicalId":11591,"journal":{"name":"Electromyography and clinical neurophysiology","volume":"50 6","pages":"269-75"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electromyography and clinical neurophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the most sensitive diagnostic test for nerve conduction study (NCS) of the foot for early detection of diabetic polyneuropathy. We compared the sensitivities for diagnosis of sensory polyneuropathy of four different nerve conduction techniques in the same nerves: nerve conduction studies of the medial plantar nerve with surface electrodes using three different techniques and a nerve conduction study of the digital and interdigital nerves of the foot using a near-nerve needle technique. In 25 patients with diabetic polyneuropathy with normal routine NCS, diagnosis of sensory neuropathy was confirmed by medial plantar NCS in 5 patients (20.0%) using Guiloff's method, in 5 patients (20.0%) using Ponsford's method and in 9 patients (36.0%) using Hemmi's method. In digital and interdigital NCS of the foot, a definite neuropathy pattern was observed in 15 patients (60.0%). The most common abnormality was low amplitude of sensory nerve action potential, indicating axonal degeneration. This study demonstrated that digital and interdigital NCS using the near-nerve needle technique is a more sensitive method for detection of early-stage diabetic polyneuropathy.

足底神经传导技术早期检测糖尿病感觉多发性神经病的敏感性比较。
本研究的目的是确定足部神经传导研究(NCS)最敏感的诊断试验,以早期发现糖尿病多发性神经病变。我们比较了四种不同的神经传导技术在同一神经上诊断感觉多发性神经病的敏感性:使用三种不同的表面电极对足底内侧神经进行神经传导研究,使用近神经针技术对足部指间神经进行神经传导研究。25例糖尿病多发神经病变常规NCS正常的患者中,5例(20.0%)采用Guiloff法,5例(20.0%)采用Ponsford法,9例(36.0%)采用Hemmi法通过足底内侧NCS诊断感觉神经病变。在足部指间和指间NCS中,15例患者(60.0%)观察到明确的神经病变模式。最常见的异常是感觉神经动作电位振幅低,提示轴突变性。本研究表明,使用近神经针技术的数字和指间NCS是一种更敏感的检测早期糖尿病多发性神经病的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信