Bergmann glial ensheathment of dendritic spines regulates synapse number without affecting spine motility.

Neuron glia biology Pub Date : 2010-08-01 Epub Date: 2010-11-02 DOI:10.1017/S1740925X10000165
Jocelyn J Lippman Bell, Tamar Lordkipanidze, Natalie Cobb, Anna Dunaevsky
{"title":"Bergmann glial ensheathment of dendritic spines regulates synapse number without affecting spine motility.","authors":"Jocelyn J Lippman Bell,&nbsp;Tamar Lordkipanidze,&nbsp;Natalie Cobb,&nbsp;Anna Dunaevsky","doi":"10.1017/S1740925X10000165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the cerebellum, lamellar Bergmann glial (BG) appendages wrap tightly around almost every Purkinje cell dendritic spine. The function of this glial ensheathment of spines is not entirely understood. The development of ensheathment begins near the onset of synaptogenesis, when motility of both BG processes and dendritic spines are high. By the end of the synaptogenic period, ensheathment is complete and motility of the BG processes decreases, correlating with the decreased motility of dendritic spines. We therefore have hypothesized that ensheathment is intimately involved in capping synaptogenesis, possibly by stabilizing synapses. To test this hypothesis, we misexpressed GluR2 in an adenoviral vector in BG towards the end of the synaptogenic period, rendering the BG α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid receptors (AMPARs) Ca2+-impermeable and causing glial sheath retraction. We then measured the resulting spine motility, spine density and synapse number. Although we found that decreasing ensheathment at this time does not alter spine motility, we did find a significant increase in both synaptic pucta and dendritic spine density. These results indicate that consistent spine coverage by BG in the cerebellum is not necessary for stabilization of spine dynamics, but is very important in the regulation of synapse number.</p>","PeriodicalId":19153,"journal":{"name":"Neuron glia biology","volume":"6 3","pages":"193-200"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/S1740925X10000165","citationCount":"34","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuron glia biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1740925X10000165","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2010/11/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 34

Abstract

In the cerebellum, lamellar Bergmann glial (BG) appendages wrap tightly around almost every Purkinje cell dendritic spine. The function of this glial ensheathment of spines is not entirely understood. The development of ensheathment begins near the onset of synaptogenesis, when motility of both BG processes and dendritic spines are high. By the end of the synaptogenic period, ensheathment is complete and motility of the BG processes decreases, correlating with the decreased motility of dendritic spines. We therefore have hypothesized that ensheathment is intimately involved in capping synaptogenesis, possibly by stabilizing synapses. To test this hypothesis, we misexpressed GluR2 in an adenoviral vector in BG towards the end of the synaptogenic period, rendering the BG α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid receptors (AMPARs) Ca2+-impermeable and causing glial sheath retraction. We then measured the resulting spine motility, spine density and synapse number. Although we found that decreasing ensheathment at this time does not alter spine motility, we did find a significant increase in both synaptic pucta and dendritic spine density. These results indicate that consistent spine coverage by BG in the cerebellum is not necessary for stabilization of spine dynamics, but is very important in the regulation of synapse number.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

树突棘的伯格曼胶质鞘在不影响脊柱运动的情况下调节突触数量。
在小脑中,板层伯格曼胶质(BG)附属物紧紧包裹着几乎每一个浦肯野细胞树突棘。这种神经胶质鞘的功能尚不完全清楚。鞘层的发育开始于突触发生的开始,此时BG突和树突棘的运动性都很高。突触形成期结束时,鞘层完整,BG突的运动性下降,与树突棘运动性下降有关。因此,我们假设鞘层与限制突触发生密切相关,可能是通过稳定突触。为了验证这一假设,我们在突触形成期结束时在BG的腺病毒载体中错误表达GluR2,使BG α-氨基-3-羟基-5-甲基-4-异恶唑丙酸受体(AMPARs) Ca2+不可渗透,并导致胶质鞘收缩。然后,我们测量了由此产生的脊柱运动性、脊柱密度和突触数量。虽然我们发现此时减少鞘层并不会改变脊柱运动,但我们确实发现突触和树突脊柱密度显著增加。这些结果表明,BG在小脑内持续覆盖脊柱并不是脊柱动力学稳定的必要条件,但在突触数量的调节中非常重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neuron glia biology
Neuron glia biology 医学-神经科学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信