Trends in social inequalities in male mortality, 2001-08. Intercensal estimates for England and Wales.

Ann Langford, Brian Johnson
{"title":"Trends in social inequalities in male mortality, 2001-08. Intercensal estimates for England and Wales.","authors":"Ann Langford,&nbsp;Brian Johnson","doi":"10.1057/hsq.2010.14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This article presents estimates of mortality rates for men of working age by the National Statistics Socio-economic Classification (NS-SEC). Previously it has been possible to produce such mortality rates only at the time of a census, when populations are enumerated by occupation and NS-SEC. This is the first time that annual intercensal estimates have been produced, enabling the measurement of health inequalities by NS-SEC for the period 2001-08.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Labour Force Survey (LFS) was used to provide population denominators by age and NS-SEC for men aged 25-64 for each year between 2001 and 2008. Numbers of deaths for the corresponding period were obtained from death registrations, and age-standardised mortality rates were derived. A number of measures of the inequality in mortality rates across socio-economic classes were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There has been a steady decrease in mortality rates for all NS-SEC classes over the period, 2001-08. Mortality rates for the 'Routine' class declined on average by around 11 deaths per 100,000 population per year, almost double that of the 'Higher managerial and professional' class. Absolute differences between the mortality of the least and most advantaged classes showed a small decline based on three different measures. Relative differences, however, increased over this period. In 2001 the mortality rate of those in routine and manual occupations was 2.0 times that of those in managerial and professional occupations. In 2008 that ratio had risen to 2.3. This pattern of declining absolute but rising relative inequalities is a well known phenomenon in the context of declining overall mortality rates.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results presented suggest that annual trends in inequalities in mortality at the national level can be effectively monitored using LFS-based measures. This would complement the current measures that are based on area of residence rather than the socio-economic position of the individual.</p>","PeriodicalId":87183,"journal":{"name":"Health statistics quarterly","volume":" 47","pages":"5-32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1057/hsq.2010.14","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health statistics quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1057/hsq.2010.14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

Abstract

Background: This article presents estimates of mortality rates for men of working age by the National Statistics Socio-economic Classification (NS-SEC). Previously it has been possible to produce such mortality rates only at the time of a census, when populations are enumerated by occupation and NS-SEC. This is the first time that annual intercensal estimates have been produced, enabling the measurement of health inequalities by NS-SEC for the period 2001-08.

Methods: The Labour Force Survey (LFS) was used to provide population denominators by age and NS-SEC for men aged 25-64 for each year between 2001 and 2008. Numbers of deaths for the corresponding period were obtained from death registrations, and age-standardised mortality rates were derived. A number of measures of the inequality in mortality rates across socio-economic classes were compared.

Results: There has been a steady decrease in mortality rates for all NS-SEC classes over the period, 2001-08. Mortality rates for the 'Routine' class declined on average by around 11 deaths per 100,000 population per year, almost double that of the 'Higher managerial and professional' class. Absolute differences between the mortality of the least and most advantaged classes showed a small decline based on three different measures. Relative differences, however, increased over this period. In 2001 the mortality rate of those in routine and manual occupations was 2.0 times that of those in managerial and professional occupations. In 2008 that ratio had risen to 2.3. This pattern of declining absolute but rising relative inequalities is a well known phenomenon in the context of declining overall mortality rates.

Conclusions: The results presented suggest that annual trends in inequalities in mortality at the national level can be effectively monitored using LFS-based measures. This would complement the current measures that are based on area of residence rather than the socio-economic position of the individual.

2001- 2008年男性死亡率的社会不平等趋势。英格兰和威尔士的人口普查间估计。
背景:本文介绍了国家统计社会经济分类(NS-SEC)对工作年龄男性死亡率的估计。以前,只有在人口普查时才有可能得出这种死亡率,当时人口是按职业和国家安全状况统计的。这是第一次编制年度普查间估计数,使全国人口统计系统能够衡量2001- 2008年期间的保健不平等情况。方法:采用劳动力调查(LFS)提供2001 - 2008年25-64岁男性的年龄人口分母和NS-SEC。同期的死亡人数来自死亡登记,并得出年龄标准化死亡率。对不同社会经济阶层死亡率不平等的若干衡量标准进行了比较。结果:在2001- 2008年期间,全国人口普查-安全普查各阶层的死亡率稳步下降。"普通"阶层的死亡率平均每年每10万人中下降约11人,几乎是"高级管理和专业"阶层的两倍。根据三种不同的衡量标准,最贫穷阶层和最富裕阶层之间的死亡率绝对差异显示出小幅下降。然而,在此期间,相对差异有所增加。2001年,常规和体力职业的死亡率是管理和专业职业死亡率的2.0倍。2008年,这一比例上升到2.3。在总体死亡率下降的背景下,这种绝对不平等减少但相对不平等加剧的模式是一种众所周知的现象。结论:本文提出的结果表明,使用基于lfs的措施可以有效地监测国家一级死亡率不平等的年度趋势。这将补充目前以居住地区而不是个人社会经济地位为基础的措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书