Application of ANAES guidelines for colonoscopy in France: A practical survey

J. Huppertz , R. Coriat , S. Leblanc, M. Gaudric, C. Brezault, S. Grandjouan, U. Chaput, F. Prat, S. Chaussade
{"title":"Application of ANAES guidelines for colonoscopy in France: A practical survey","authors":"J. Huppertz ,&nbsp;R. Coriat ,&nbsp;S. Leblanc,&nbsp;M. Gaudric,&nbsp;C. Brezault,&nbsp;S. Grandjouan,&nbsp;U. Chaput,&nbsp;F. Prat,&nbsp;S. Chaussade","doi":"10.1016/j.gcb.2010.03.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>In 2004, the French health authorities published guidelines on the indications for colonoscopy. However, no study has evaluated the awareness of healthcare practitioners of these guidelines. The aim of this study was to determine the level of awareness of the Anaes guidelines among French gastroenterologists.</p></div><div><h3>Patients and methods</h3><p>A questionnaire comprising 20 multiple choice questions (MCQ) was presented to a group of 79 gastroenterologists between February and June in 2008. The questions covered screening tests for colon cancer (one question), endoscopic mucosal resection (two questions) and the Anaes guidelines (17 questions). According to the number of colonoscopies performed per year (less than 100, 100–500, more than 500), the answers to these questions were analyzed separately.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Among the practitioners carrying out less than 100, 100–500 and more than 500 colonoscopies per year, the guidelines for colon cancer screening were known by 33, 50 and 56%, respectively, the quality criteria for endoscopic mucosal resection by 0, 0 and 3.7%, respectively, and the Anaes guideline indications for colonoscopy by 34.3, 51.2 and 48.9%, respectively (<em>P</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.001). The Anaes guidelines were significantly better known by practitioners who were performing more than 100 colonoscopies per year, while the indications for control colonoscopy were less often correctly anticipated. No differences were found concerning postponed indications.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The Anaes guidelines consists of the following elements: (1) awareness of the Anaes guidelines is poor, with control colonoscopy being correctly anticipated in just over a third of the gastroenterologists; (2) performing more than 100 colonoscopies per year improves knowledge of the Anaes guidelines; and (3) the Anaes guidelines need to be simplified and should be covered by continuing medical education.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12508,"journal":{"name":"Gastroenterologie Clinique Et Biologique","volume":"34 10","pages":"Pages 541-548"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.gcb.2010.03.017","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gastroenterologie Clinique Et Biologique","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0399832010002733","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Objectives

In 2004, the French health authorities published guidelines on the indications for colonoscopy. However, no study has evaluated the awareness of healthcare practitioners of these guidelines. The aim of this study was to determine the level of awareness of the Anaes guidelines among French gastroenterologists.

Patients and methods

A questionnaire comprising 20 multiple choice questions (MCQ) was presented to a group of 79 gastroenterologists between February and June in 2008. The questions covered screening tests for colon cancer (one question), endoscopic mucosal resection (two questions) and the Anaes guidelines (17 questions). According to the number of colonoscopies performed per year (less than 100, 100–500, more than 500), the answers to these questions were analyzed separately.

Results

Among the practitioners carrying out less than 100, 100–500 and more than 500 colonoscopies per year, the guidelines for colon cancer screening were known by 33, 50 and 56%, respectively, the quality criteria for endoscopic mucosal resection by 0, 0 and 3.7%, respectively, and the Anaes guideline indications for colonoscopy by 34.3, 51.2 and 48.9%, respectively (P < 0.001). The Anaes guidelines were significantly better known by practitioners who were performing more than 100 colonoscopies per year, while the indications for control colonoscopy were less often correctly anticipated. No differences were found concerning postponed indications.

Conclusion

The Anaes guidelines consists of the following elements: (1) awareness of the Anaes guidelines is poor, with control colonoscopy being correctly anticipated in just over a third of the gastroenterologists; (2) performing more than 100 colonoscopies per year improves knowledge of the Anaes guidelines; and (3) the Anaes guidelines need to be simplified and should be covered by continuing medical education.

在法国应用ANAES指南进行结肠镜检查:一项实际调查
目的2004年,法国卫生当局公布了结肠镜检查适应症指南。然而,没有研究评估过医疗保健从业人员对这些指南的认识。本研究的目的是确定法国胃肠病学家对阿纳斯指南的认识水平。患者与方法在2008年2月至6月期间,向79名胃肠病学家提交了一份包含20道选择题(MCQ)的问卷。问题包括结肠癌筛查测试(1个问题)、内镜粘膜切除术(2个问题)和美国癌症学会指南(17个问题)。根据每年结肠镜检查的次数(少于100次、100 - 500次、超过500次),分别对这些问题的答案进行分析。结果在年结肠镜检查次数小于100次、100 - 500次和大于500次的从业人员中,对结肠癌筛查指南的了解率分别为33.50%和56%,对内镜粘膜切除术质量标准的了解率分别为0%、0%和3.7%,对anes指南结肠镜检查指征的了解率分别为34.3%、51.2%和48.9% (P <0.001)。每年进行超过100次结肠镜检查的从业人员对Anaes指南的了解程度明显更高,而对照结肠镜检查的适应症往往没有得到正确的预测。在延迟适应症方面没有发现差异。结论anes指南包括以下内容:(1)对anes指南的认知度较差,仅有三分之一以上的胃肠科医生正确预测了对照结肠镜检查;(2)每年进行超过100次的结肠镜检查,提高了对aanas指南的了解;(3)需要简化Anaes指南,并应纳入继续医学教育。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信