Lenalidomide in multiple myeloma: an evidence-based review of its role in therapy.

Core Evidence Pub Date : 2010-06-15 DOI:10.2147/ce.s6002
Paul Richardson, Constantine Mitsiades, Jacob Laubach, Robert Schlossman, Irene Ghobrial, Teru Hideshima, Nikhil Munshi, Kenneth Anderson
{"title":"Lenalidomide in multiple myeloma: an evidence-based review of its role in therapy.","authors":"Paul Richardson, Constantine Mitsiades, Jacob Laubach, Robert Schlossman, Irene Ghobrial, Teru Hideshima, Nikhil Munshi, Kenneth Anderson","doi":"10.2147/ce.s6002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Multiple myeloma (MM) is a relatively common and incurable hematological malignancy. Currently, there is no single standard therapy, with choice of treatment dependent on individual patient factors. Lenalidomide is an immunomodulatory drug with potent antitumor, antiangiogenic, immunomodulatory, and proapoptotic activity in MM.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To evaluate the evidence for the use of lenalidomide in its current indication in relapsed or refractory MM, and additionally its investigational use for the treatment of newly diagnosed MM.</p><p><strong>Evidence review: </strong>In patients with relapsed and refractory MM, adding lenalidomide to high-dose dexamethasone significantly improves response rates and time-to-progression, relative to high-dose dexamethasone alone. This translates into a significant extension of overall survival (with a median extension of 9.1 months in a pivotal phase III study). Outcome is independent of patient age, number of previous therapies, type of previous therapy (including thalidomide or autologous stem cell transplantation), renal impairment, and beta(2)-microglobulin level. Evidence suggests that combining lenalidomide with low-dose dexamethasone improves outcomes in patients with newly diagnosed disease and is superior to lenalidomide combined with high-dose dexamethasone. Myelosuppression is the predominant toxicity observed, although some studies have shown high incidences of venous thromboembolism in the absence of prophylactic antithrombotic anticoagulation therapy. There is currently only limited evidence regarding the health economics of lenalidomide. ROLE IN THERAPY: The encouraging results obtained with lenalidomide alone and in combination with dexamethasone in patients with relapsed or refractory MM have led to its adoption as a recommended therapy in patients who have received at least one prior treatment. Emerging evidence supports the ongoing investigation of lenalidomide in combination with low-dose dexamethasone, and in other combinations including bortezomib, for use both in relapsed, refractory, and newly diagnosed MM.</p>","PeriodicalId":10764,"journal":{"name":"Core Evidence","volume":"4 ","pages":"215-45"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2899783/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Core Evidence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/ce.s6002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Multiple myeloma (MM) is a relatively common and incurable hematological malignancy. Currently, there is no single standard therapy, with choice of treatment dependent on individual patient factors. Lenalidomide is an immunomodulatory drug with potent antitumor, antiangiogenic, immunomodulatory, and proapoptotic activity in MM.

Aims: To evaluate the evidence for the use of lenalidomide in its current indication in relapsed or refractory MM, and additionally its investigational use for the treatment of newly diagnosed MM.

Evidence review: In patients with relapsed and refractory MM, adding lenalidomide to high-dose dexamethasone significantly improves response rates and time-to-progression, relative to high-dose dexamethasone alone. This translates into a significant extension of overall survival (with a median extension of 9.1 months in a pivotal phase III study). Outcome is independent of patient age, number of previous therapies, type of previous therapy (including thalidomide or autologous stem cell transplantation), renal impairment, and beta(2)-microglobulin level. Evidence suggests that combining lenalidomide with low-dose dexamethasone improves outcomes in patients with newly diagnosed disease and is superior to lenalidomide combined with high-dose dexamethasone. Myelosuppression is the predominant toxicity observed, although some studies have shown high incidences of venous thromboembolism in the absence of prophylactic antithrombotic anticoagulation therapy. There is currently only limited evidence regarding the health economics of lenalidomide. ROLE IN THERAPY: The encouraging results obtained with lenalidomide alone and in combination with dexamethasone in patients with relapsed or refractory MM have led to its adoption as a recommended therapy in patients who have received at least one prior treatment. Emerging evidence supports the ongoing investigation of lenalidomide in combination with low-dose dexamethasone, and in other combinations including bortezomib, for use both in relapsed, refractory, and newly diagnosed MM.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

来那度胺治疗多发性骨髓瘤:其治疗作用的循证综述。
引言:多发性骨髓瘤(MM)是一种相对常见且无法治愈的血液系统恶性肿瘤。目前,还没有单一的标准治疗方法,治疗的选择取决于个别患者的因素。来那度胺是一种免疫调节药物,在MM中具有强大的抗肿瘤、抗血管生成、免疫调节和促凋亡活性。目的:评估来那度酰胺在复发或难治性MM的当前适应症中的应用证据,以及其在治疗新诊断MM中的研究用途。证据综述:在复发和难治性MM,与单独使用高剂量地塞米松相比,在高剂量地塞米松中加入来那度胺可显著提高反应率和进展时间。这转化为总生存期的显著延长(在一项关键的III期研究中,中位延长9.1个月)。结果与患者年龄、既往治疗次数、既往治疗类型(包括沙利度胺或自体干细胞移植)、肾损伤和β(2)-微球蛋白水平无关。有证据表明,来那度胺联合低剂量地塞米松可改善新诊断疾病患者的预后,并且优于来那度酰胺联合高剂量地塞米松。骨髓抑制是观察到的主要毒性,尽管一些研究表明,在缺乏预防性抗血栓抗凝治疗的情况下,静脉血栓栓塞的发生率很高。关于来那度胺的健康经济学,目前只有有限的证据。治疗中的作用:来那度胺单独使用和联合地塞米松治疗复发或难治性多发性骨髓瘤患者取得了令人鼓舞的结果,使其成为至少接受过一次治疗的患者的推荐疗法。新出现的证据支持正在进行的来那度胺联合低剂量地塞米松以及包括硼替佐米在内的其他组合治疗复发、难治和新诊断MM的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Core Evidence
Core Evidence PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Core Evidence evaluates the evidence underlying the potential place in therapy of drugs throughout their development lifecycle from preclinical to postlaunch. The focus of each review is to evaluate the case for a new drug or class in outcome terms in specific indications and patient groups The emerging evidence on new drugs is reviewed at key stages of development and evaluated against unmet needs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信