Treated Colorectal Cancer: What is the Cost to Primary Care?

D A L Macafee, J West, J H Scholefield, D K Whynes
{"title":"Treated Colorectal Cancer: What is the Cost to Primary Care?","authors":"D A L Macafee,&nbsp;J West,&nbsp;J H Scholefield,&nbsp;D K Whynes","doi":"10.4137/cmo.s877","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Colorectal cancer is the second commonest cause of cancer death and the cost to primary care has not been estimated.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To determine the direct primary care costs of colorectal cancer care.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective case note review.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Nottingham, United Kingdom.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We identified people with colorectal cancer between 1995 and 1998, from computerised pathology records. Colorectal cancer related resources consumed in primary care, from hospital discharge to death, were identified from retrospective notes review. Outcome measures were costs incurred by the General Practitioner (GP) and the total cost to primary care. We used multiple linear regression to identify predictors of cost.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 416 people identified from pathology records, the median age at primary operation of the 135 (33%) people we selected was 74.2 (IQR 14.4) years, 75 (56%) were male. The median GP cost was: Dukes A pound61.0 (IQR 516.2) and Dukes D pound936.2 (1196.2) p < 0.01. The geometric mean ratio found Dukes D cancers to be 10 times as costly as Dukes A. The median total cost was: Dukes A pound1038.3 (IQR 5090.6) and Dukes D pound1815.2 (2092.5) p = 0.06. Using multivariate analysis, Dukes stage was the most important predictor of GP costs. For total costs, the presence of a permanent stoma was the most predictive variable, followed by adjuvant therapy and advanced Dukes stage (Dukes C and D).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Contrary to hospital based care costs, late stage disease (Dukes D) costs substantially more to general practice than any other stage. Stoma care products are the most costly prescribable item. Costs savings may be realised in primary care by screening detection of early stage colorectal cancers.</p>","PeriodicalId":88451,"journal":{"name":"Clinical medicine. Oncology","volume":"3 ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4137/cmo.s877","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical medicine. Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4137/cmo.s877","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Colorectal cancer is the second commonest cause of cancer death and the cost to primary care has not been estimated.

Aim: To determine the direct primary care costs of colorectal cancer care.

Design: Retrospective case note review.

Setting: Nottingham, United Kingdom.

Methods: We identified people with colorectal cancer between 1995 and 1998, from computerised pathology records. Colorectal cancer related resources consumed in primary care, from hospital discharge to death, were identified from retrospective notes review. Outcome measures were costs incurred by the General Practitioner (GP) and the total cost to primary care. We used multiple linear regression to identify predictors of cost.

Results: Of 416 people identified from pathology records, the median age at primary operation of the 135 (33%) people we selected was 74.2 (IQR 14.4) years, 75 (56%) were male. The median GP cost was: Dukes A pound61.0 (IQR 516.2) and Dukes D pound936.2 (1196.2) p < 0.01. The geometric mean ratio found Dukes D cancers to be 10 times as costly as Dukes A. The median total cost was: Dukes A pound1038.3 (IQR 5090.6) and Dukes D pound1815.2 (2092.5) p = 0.06. Using multivariate analysis, Dukes stage was the most important predictor of GP costs. For total costs, the presence of a permanent stoma was the most predictive variable, followed by adjuvant therapy and advanced Dukes stage (Dukes C and D).

Conclusions: Contrary to hospital based care costs, late stage disease (Dukes D) costs substantially more to general practice than any other stage. Stoma care products are the most costly prescribable item. Costs savings may be realised in primary care by screening detection of early stage colorectal cancers.

结直肠癌治疗:初级保健费用是多少?
背景:结直肠癌是癌症死亡的第二大常见原因,初级保健费用尚未估计。目的:确定结直肠癌治疗的直接初级保健费用。设计:回顾性病例记录回顾。背景:英国诺丁汉。方法:我们从计算机化的病理记录中确定了1995年至1998年间的结直肠癌患者。从出院到死亡,在初级保健中消耗的结直肠癌相关资源是通过回顾性记录审查确定的。结果测量是全科医生(GP)的费用和初级保健的总费用。我们使用多元线性回归来确定成本的预测因素。结果:从病理记录中确定的416例患者中,我们选择的135例(33%)患者初次手术时的中位年龄为74.2 (IQR 14.4)岁,其中75例(56%)为男性。平均GP费用为:Dukes A£61.0 (IQR 516.2)和Dukes D£936.2 (IQR 1196.2) p < 0.01。几何平均比率发现,杜克大学患D型癌症的成本是杜克大学患A型癌症的10倍。总成本中位数为:杜克大学患A型癌症的成本为1038.3英镑(IQR为5090.6),而杜克大学患D型癌症的成本为1815.2英镑(2092.5),p = 0.06。通过多变量分析,Dukes分期是GP费用最重要的预测因子。对于总费用而言,永久性造口的存在是最具预测性的变量,其次是辅助治疗和晚期Dukes期(Dukes C和D)。结论:与医院护理费用相反,晚期疾病(Dukes D)的费用比其他任何阶段都要高。口腔护理产品是最昂贵的处方项目。通过早期结直肠癌的筛查检测,可在初级保健中节省费用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信