Bioequivalence of the 4-mg Oral Granules and Chewable Tablet Formulations of Montelukast.

Barbara Knorr, Alan Hartford, Xiujiang Susie Li, Amy Yifan Yang, Gertrude Noonan, Elizabeth Migoya
{"title":"Bioequivalence of the 4-mg Oral Granules and Chewable Tablet Formulations of Montelukast.","authors":"Barbara Knorr,&nbsp;Alan Hartford,&nbsp;Xiujiang Susie Li,&nbsp;Amy Yifan Yang,&nbsp;Gertrude Noonan,&nbsp;Elizabeth Migoya","doi":"10.1111/j.1753-5174.2010.00029.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>PURPOSE: The primary objective of the studies was to demonstrate bioequivalence between the oral granules formulation and chewable tablet of montelukast in the fasted state. Effect of food on the pharmacokinetics of the oral granules was also evaluated. METHODS: The Formulation Biocomparison Study (Study 1) and the Final Market Image Study (Study 2) each used an open-label, randomized, 3-period crossover design where healthy adult subjects (N = 24 and 30, respectively) received montelukast as a single 4-mg dose of the oral granules formulation and a 4-mg chewable tablet fasted, and a single 4-mg dose of the oral granules formulation with food (on 2 teaspoons of applesauce [Study 1] or after consumption of a high-fat breakfast [Study 2]). The formulations were to be considered bioequivalent if the 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for geometric mean ratios (GMRs) (oral granules/chewable tablet) for the AUC(0-infinity) and C(max) of montelukast were within the prespecified comparability bounds of (0.80, 1.25). For the food-effect assessment in Study 1, comparability bounds were prespecified as (0.50, 2.00) only for the 90% CI of the GMR (oral granules fed/oral granules fasted) for the AUC(0-infinity) of montelukast; the 90% CI of the GMR for the C(max) of montelukast, however, also was computed. In Study 2, 90% CIs of the GMRs (oral granules fed/oral granules fasted) for the AUC(0-infinity) and C(max) of montelukast were computed; comparability bounds were not prespecified. RESULTS: Comparing the exposure of the formulations, the 90% CIs of the GMRs for AUC(0-infinity) and C(max) were within the prespecified bound of (0.80, 1.25). For AUC(0-infinity), the GMRs (90% CI) for Study 1 and Study 2 were 1.01 (0.92, 1.11) and 0.95 (0.91, 0.99), respectively. For C(max), respective values were 0.99 (0.86, 1.13) and 0.92 (0.84, 1.01). When the oral granules formulation was administered with food, 90% CIs of the GMRs for both AUC(0-infinity) and C(max) in both studies were contained within the interval of (0.50, 2.00). CONCLUSIONS: The 4-mg oral granules and 4-mg chewable tablet formulations of montelukast administered in the fasted state are bioequivalent. Single 4-mg doses of the oral granules formulation and the chewable tablet of montelukast are generally well tolerated.</p>","PeriodicalId":8181,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Drug Information","volume":"3 2","pages":"37-43"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1753-5174.2010.00029.x","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Drug Information","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-5174.2010.00029.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

PURPOSE: The primary objective of the studies was to demonstrate bioequivalence between the oral granules formulation and chewable tablet of montelukast in the fasted state. Effect of food on the pharmacokinetics of the oral granules was also evaluated. METHODS: The Formulation Biocomparison Study (Study 1) and the Final Market Image Study (Study 2) each used an open-label, randomized, 3-period crossover design where healthy adult subjects (N = 24 and 30, respectively) received montelukast as a single 4-mg dose of the oral granules formulation and a 4-mg chewable tablet fasted, and a single 4-mg dose of the oral granules formulation with food (on 2 teaspoons of applesauce [Study 1] or after consumption of a high-fat breakfast [Study 2]). The formulations were to be considered bioequivalent if the 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for geometric mean ratios (GMRs) (oral granules/chewable tablet) for the AUC(0-infinity) and C(max) of montelukast were within the prespecified comparability bounds of (0.80, 1.25). For the food-effect assessment in Study 1, comparability bounds were prespecified as (0.50, 2.00) only for the 90% CI of the GMR (oral granules fed/oral granules fasted) for the AUC(0-infinity) of montelukast; the 90% CI of the GMR for the C(max) of montelukast, however, also was computed. In Study 2, 90% CIs of the GMRs (oral granules fed/oral granules fasted) for the AUC(0-infinity) and C(max) of montelukast were computed; comparability bounds were not prespecified. RESULTS: Comparing the exposure of the formulations, the 90% CIs of the GMRs for AUC(0-infinity) and C(max) were within the prespecified bound of (0.80, 1.25). For AUC(0-infinity), the GMRs (90% CI) for Study 1 and Study 2 were 1.01 (0.92, 1.11) and 0.95 (0.91, 0.99), respectively. For C(max), respective values were 0.99 (0.86, 1.13) and 0.92 (0.84, 1.01). When the oral granules formulation was administered with food, 90% CIs of the GMRs for both AUC(0-infinity) and C(max) in both studies were contained within the interval of (0.50, 2.00). CONCLUSIONS: The 4-mg oral granules and 4-mg chewable tablet formulations of montelukast administered in the fasted state are bioequivalent. Single 4-mg doses of the oral granules formulation and the chewable tablet of montelukast are generally well tolerated.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

孟鲁司特4毫克口服颗粒剂和咀嚼片制剂的生物等效性。
目的:研究的主要目的是证明口服颗粒制剂和咀嚼片孟鲁司特在禁食状态下的生物等效性。并评价了食物对口服颗粒剂药代动力学的影响。方法:制剂生物比较研究(研究1)和最终市场图像研究(研究2)均采用开放标签、随机、3期交叉设计,其中健康成人受试者(分别为N = 24和30)接受孟鲁司特单剂量4 mg口服颗粒制剂和4 mg咀嚼片剂禁食,单剂量4 mg口服颗粒制剂与食物(2茶匙苹果酱[研究1]或食用高脂肪早餐后[研究2])。如果孟鲁司特的AUC(0-∞)和C(max)的几何平均比(GMRs)(口服颗粒/咀嚼片)的90%置信区间(CIs)在预先规定的可比性界限(0.80,1.25)内,则认为制剂具有生物等效性。对于研究1中的食物效应评估,孟鲁司特AUC(0-无穷大)的GMR(口服颗粒喂养/口服颗粒禁食)90% CI的可比性界限预先指定为(0.50,2.00);然而,也计算了孟鲁司特C(max)的GMR的90% CI。在研究2中,计算了孟鲁司特的AUC(0-∞)和C(max)的90% CIs(口服颗粒喂养/口服颗粒禁食);可比性界限没有预先规定。结果:比较各剂型的暴露情况,AUC(0-∞)和C(max)的gmr 90% ci均在(0.80,1.25)的预设范围内。对于AUC(0-∞),研究1和研究2的GMRs (90% CI)分别为1.01(0.92,1.11)和0.95(0.91,0.99)。C(max)分别为0.99(0.86,1.13)和0.92(0.84,1.01)。当口服颗粒制剂与食物一起给药时,两项研究中AUC(0-∞)和C(max)的gmr的90% CIs都包含在(0.50,2.00)区间内。结论:孟鲁司特4 mg口服颗粒剂和4 mg咀嚼片剂在禁食状态下具有生物等效性。单次4毫克口服颗粒剂制剂和咀嚼片剂孟鲁司特通常耐受性良好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信