[Change, transformation, evolution].

J M Barthélémy
{"title":"[Change, transformation, evolution].","authors":"J M Barthélémy","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>\"Change\", \"transformation\" and \"evolution\" are terms not at all interchangeable. They point at realities and deeply apply to mechanisms which partially intertwine each other without ever being overlapped or confused. We would like to distinguish and investigate their diffusion in former and current psychological approaches, especially when dealing with the analysis and follow-up of a moving process. We will present some illustrations, in the field of the phenomeno-structural method, which, after having dedicated an important part of its works to the enlightment of the organization of the mental structure, from 1920 to 1950, felt the need, from the 50's onwards, to follow its evolution through a set of psychological modifications pointing in a main direction: during normal and pathological development throughout childhood or at the critical moment of the adolescence period, in psychosurgery or psychobiological practices, then in cases of appearing and disappearing of delusional processes, in the follow-up of determining transformation phases during alcoholic detoxification, or, more recently, in the appreciation of the psychotherapeutic practices (directed daydream, relaxation). We will show how this perspective, standing apart and suspicious to the restrictive current tendency towards evaluation, takes part in a much wider theoretical and methodological frame with a constant concern to consider the sustainable effects and the limits of various events, circumstances or procedures on the structure of personality, through a vast and coherent understanding of the underlying psychological mechanisms which steer them by giving them sense.</p>","PeriodicalId":72476,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin de la Societe des sciences medicales du Grand-Duche de Luxembourg","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin de la Societe des sciences medicales du Grand-Duche de Luxembourg","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

"Change", "transformation" and "evolution" are terms not at all interchangeable. They point at realities and deeply apply to mechanisms which partially intertwine each other without ever being overlapped or confused. We would like to distinguish and investigate their diffusion in former and current psychological approaches, especially when dealing with the analysis and follow-up of a moving process. We will present some illustrations, in the field of the phenomeno-structural method, which, after having dedicated an important part of its works to the enlightment of the organization of the mental structure, from 1920 to 1950, felt the need, from the 50's onwards, to follow its evolution through a set of psychological modifications pointing in a main direction: during normal and pathological development throughout childhood or at the critical moment of the adolescence period, in psychosurgery or psychobiological practices, then in cases of appearing and disappearing of delusional processes, in the follow-up of determining transformation phases during alcoholic detoxification, or, more recently, in the appreciation of the psychotherapeutic practices (directed daydream, relaxation). We will show how this perspective, standing apart and suspicious to the restrictive current tendency towards evaluation, takes part in a much wider theoretical and methodological frame with a constant concern to consider the sustainable effects and the limits of various events, circumstances or procedures on the structure of personality, through a vast and coherent understanding of the underlying psychological mechanisms which steer them by giving them sense.

[变化,转型,进化]。
“改变”、“转型”和“进化”是完全不能互换的术语。它们指向现实,并深深适用于部分相互交织而不会重叠或混淆的机制。我们希望区分和研究它们在过去和现在的心理学方法中的扩散,特别是在处理移动过程的分析和后续时。我们将在现象结构方法领域展示一些例证,这种方法从1920年到1950年,在其作品的重要部分致力于对心理结构组织的启蒙之后,觉得有必要从50年代开始,通过一系列心理修正来跟随它的演变,指向一个主要方向:在整个童年时期的正常和病理发展或青春期的关键时刻,在精神外科或心理生物学实践中,然后在妄想过程出现和消失的情况下,在酒精解毒期间确定转变阶段的后续行动中,或最近在心理治疗实践(定向白日梦,放松)的欣赏中。我们将展示这一观点是如何与目前限制性的评估倾向分开并持怀疑态度的,它是如何参与到一个更广泛的理论和方法框架中来的,通过对潜在的心理机制的广泛而连贯的理解,通过赋予它们意义,来考虑各种事件、环境或程序对人格结构的可持续影响和限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信