The Quantification of Glycosaminoglycans: A Comparison of HPLC, Carbazole, and Alcian Blue Methods.

Sarah B Frazier, Kevin A Roodhouse, Dennis E Hourcade, Lijuan Zhang
{"title":"The Quantification of Glycosaminoglycans: A Comparison of HPLC, Carbazole, and Alcian Blue Methods.","authors":"Sarah B Frazier,&nbsp;Kevin A Roodhouse,&nbsp;Dennis E Hourcade,&nbsp;Lijuan Zhang","doi":"10.2174/1875398100801010031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) are linear polysaccharides that are found in the extracellular matrix and biological fluids of animals where they interact with hundreds of proteins and perform a variety of critical roles. There are five classes of animal GAGs: heparan sulfate (HS), chondroitin sulfate (CS), dermatan sulfate (DS), keratan sulfate (KS), and hyaluronan (HA). Many biological functions can be monitored directly by their impact on GAG quantity. Thus, simple, sensitive, and robust GAG quantification methods are needed for the development of biomarkers. We have systematically compared three available GAG quantification assays including an HPLC-based assay, a simplified Alcian Blue assay, and a miniaturized carbazole assay. The carbazole and Alcian Blue assays were reproducible and simple to perform in general lab settings, but had important limitations: The carbazole assay could not detect KS and it overestimated GAGs that were contaminated with salts or dissolved in PBS. The Alcian Blue assay detected only those GAGs that were sulfated. In contrast, while the HPLC method was time-consuming, it was a robust and sensitive assay that not only detected all GAGs but also quantified glucosamine-GAGs and galactosamine-GAGs simultaneously. The HPLC assay was not affected by salt or level of GAG sulfation and it yielded reproducible values for all types of GAGs tested. These results suggest that an automated HPLC assay would be generally useful for the routine measurement of a panel of GAG-based biomarkers while the carbazole assay and the Alcian Blue assays could prove valuable for more specific purposes.</p>","PeriodicalId":88944,"journal":{"name":"Open glycoscience","volume":"1 ","pages":"31-39"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2174/1875398100801010031","citationCount":"107","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open glycoscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1875398100801010031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 107

Abstract

Glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) are linear polysaccharides that are found in the extracellular matrix and biological fluids of animals where they interact with hundreds of proteins and perform a variety of critical roles. There are five classes of animal GAGs: heparan sulfate (HS), chondroitin sulfate (CS), dermatan sulfate (DS), keratan sulfate (KS), and hyaluronan (HA). Many biological functions can be monitored directly by their impact on GAG quantity. Thus, simple, sensitive, and robust GAG quantification methods are needed for the development of biomarkers. We have systematically compared three available GAG quantification assays including an HPLC-based assay, a simplified Alcian Blue assay, and a miniaturized carbazole assay. The carbazole and Alcian Blue assays were reproducible and simple to perform in general lab settings, but had important limitations: The carbazole assay could not detect KS and it overestimated GAGs that were contaminated with salts or dissolved in PBS. The Alcian Blue assay detected only those GAGs that were sulfated. In contrast, while the HPLC method was time-consuming, it was a robust and sensitive assay that not only detected all GAGs but also quantified glucosamine-GAGs and galactosamine-GAGs simultaneously. The HPLC assay was not affected by salt or level of GAG sulfation and it yielded reproducible values for all types of GAGs tested. These results suggest that an automated HPLC assay would be generally useful for the routine measurement of a panel of GAG-based biomarkers while the carbazole assay and the Alcian Blue assays could prove valuable for more specific purposes.

糖胺聚糖的定量:HPLC法、咔唑法和阿利新蓝法的比较。
糖胺聚糖(GAGs)是一种线性多糖,存在于动物的细胞外基质和生物液体中,它们与数百种蛋白质相互作用并发挥各种关键作用。动物GAGs有五类:硫酸肝素(HS)、硫酸软骨素(CS)、硫酸皮肤素(DS)、硫酸角蛋白(KS)和透明质酸(HA)。许多生物学功能可以通过它们对GAG量的影响直接监测。因此,开发生物标志物需要简单、灵敏、可靠的GAG定量方法。我们系统地比较了三种可用的GAG定量分析方法,包括基于高效液相色谱的分析,简化的阿利新蓝分析和小型化的咔唑分析。咔唑法和阿利新蓝法在一般实验室环境下重复性好,操作简单,但有重要的局限性:咔唑法不能检测KS,而且对被盐污染或溶解在PBS中的gag估计过高。阿利新蓝法只检测到那些硫酸酸化的gag。相比而言,高效液相色谱法耗时较长,但它是一种既能检测到所有的GAGs,又能同时定量葡萄糖胺-GAGs和半乳糖胺-GAGs的可靠、灵敏的方法。HPLC测定不受盐或GAG硫酸化水平的影响,对所有类型的GAG都有可重复性。这些结果表明,自动化高效液相色谱法通常可用于常规测量一组基于gag的生物标志物,而咔唑法和阿利新蓝法可用于更特定的目的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信