Camillo Golgi and Santiago Ramon y Cajal: The anatomical organization of the cortex of the cerebellum. Can the neuron doctrine still support our actual knowledge on the cerebellar structural arrangement?

Constantino Sotelo
{"title":"Camillo Golgi and Santiago Ramon y Cajal: The anatomical organization of the cortex of the cerebellum. Can the neuron doctrine still support our actual knowledge on the cerebellar structural arrangement?","authors":"Constantino Sotelo","doi":"10.1016/j.brainresrev.2010.05.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Camillo Golgi and Santiago Ramón y Cajal were the two main investigators that revealed the morphological organization of the cerebellar cortex, although they never shared the same basic concepts. While for Golgi all axons fused into a large </span>syncytium (the diffuse nerve network), for Cajal they had free endings and communication between neurons was done by contiguity not by continuity. The classical diagrammatic representation of the cerebellar circuitry shown by Cajal in his Croonian lecture (1894), although still valid, has drastically change by the accumulation of the great amount of data generated from 1894 to our days. The topic of this review is to briefly summarize this new knowledge, and to confront it with Cajal's concepts, to determine whether or not the added complexity to the circuit invalidates the Cajal's principles. Our conclusion is that although most of these principles are consolidated, the applicability of the law of dynamic polarization does not adapt to some of them.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":9291,"journal":{"name":"Brain Research Reviews","volume":"66 1","pages":"Pages 16-34"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.brainresrev.2010.05.004","citationCount":"23","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain Research Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165017310000688","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

Abstract

Camillo Golgi and Santiago Ramón y Cajal were the two main investigators that revealed the morphological organization of the cerebellar cortex, although they never shared the same basic concepts. While for Golgi all axons fused into a large syncytium (the diffuse nerve network), for Cajal they had free endings and communication between neurons was done by contiguity not by continuity. The classical diagrammatic representation of the cerebellar circuitry shown by Cajal in his Croonian lecture (1894), although still valid, has drastically change by the accumulation of the great amount of data generated from 1894 to our days. The topic of this review is to briefly summarize this new knowledge, and to confront it with Cajal's concepts, to determine whether or not the added complexity to the circuit invalidates the Cajal's principles. Our conclusion is that although most of these principles are consolidated, the applicability of the law of dynamic polarization does not adapt to some of them.

卡米洛·高尔基和圣地亚哥·拉蒙·卡哈尔:小脑皮层的解剖组织。神经元学说还能支持我们对小脑结构安排的实际认识吗?
卡米洛·高尔基(Camillo Golgi)和圣地亚哥·Ramón y·卡哈尔(Santiago y Cajal)是揭示小脑皮层形态组织的两位主要研究者,尽管他们从未共享相同的基本概念。对于高尔基来说,所有的轴突融合成一个大的合胞体(弥漫性神经网络),而对于卡哈尔来说,它们有自由的末梢,神经元之间的交流是通过邻近而不是连续性来完成的。卡哈尔在他的克罗尼亚演讲(1894年)中所展示的小脑电路的经典图解表示,虽然仍然有效,但由于1894年至今产生的大量数据的积累,已经发生了巨大的变化。本综述的主题是简要总结这一新知识,并将其与Cajal的概念进行比较,以确定电路增加的复杂性是否会使Cajal的原理失效。我们的结论是,虽然这些原则中的大部分得到了巩固,但动态极化定律的适用性并不适合其中的一些。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Brain Research Reviews
Brain Research Reviews 医学-神经科学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信