Is A1C Variability an Independent Predictor for the Progression of Atherosclerosis in Type 2 Diabetic Patients?

Korean diabetes journal Pub Date : 2010-06-01 Epub Date: 2010-06-30 DOI:10.4093/kdj.2010.34.3.174
Chul Sik Kim, So Young Park, Sung Hoon Yu, Jun Goo Kang, Ohk Hyun Ryu, Seong Jin Lee, Eun Gyung Hong, Hyeon Kyu Kim, Doo-Man Kim, Jae Myung Yoo, Sung Hee Ihm, Moon Gi Choi, Hyung Joon Yoo
{"title":"Is A1C Variability an Independent Predictor for the Progression of Atherosclerosis in Type 2 Diabetic Patients?","authors":"Chul Sik Kim,&nbsp;So Young Park,&nbsp;Sung Hoon Yu,&nbsp;Jun Goo Kang,&nbsp;Ohk Hyun Ryu,&nbsp;Seong Jin Lee,&nbsp;Eun Gyung Hong,&nbsp;Hyeon Kyu Kim,&nbsp;Doo-Man Kim,&nbsp;Jae Myung Yoo,&nbsp;Sung Hee Ihm,&nbsp;Moon Gi Choi,&nbsp;Hyung Joon Yoo","doi":"10.4093/kdj.2010.34.3.174","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Little is known about the relative contribution of long-term glycemic variability to the risk of macrovascular complications in type 2 diabetes. This study was conducted to evaluate the effect of A1C variability on the progression of carotid artery intima-media thickness (IMT) in type 2 diabetic patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Among type 2 diabetic patients who visited Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital from March 2007 to September 2009, 120 patients who had carotid artery IMT measured annually and A1C checked every three months for at least one year were analyzed. Individual A1C variability was defined as the standard deviation (SD) of five A1C levels taken every three months for approximately one year. Change in IMT was defined as an increase in IMT on follow-up measurement. The association between the SD of A1C and changes in IMT was evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>With greater A1C variability, there was a greater increase in the mean IMT (r = 0.350, P < 0.001) of the carotid artery. After adjusting for confounding factors that may influence IMT, A1C variability was significantly associated with the progression of IMT (r = 0.222, P = 0.034). However, the SD of A1C was not a significant independent risk factor for the progression of IMT in multiple regression analysis (beta = 0.158, P = 0.093).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Higher A1C variability is associated with IMT progression in type 2 diabetic patients; however, it is not an independent predictor of IMT progression. Overall glycemic control is the most important factor in the progression of IMT.</p>","PeriodicalId":88924,"journal":{"name":"Korean diabetes journal","volume":"34 3","pages":"174-81"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4093/kdj.2010.34.3.174","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean diabetes journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4093/kdj.2010.34.3.174","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2010/6/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Background: Little is known about the relative contribution of long-term glycemic variability to the risk of macrovascular complications in type 2 diabetes. This study was conducted to evaluate the effect of A1C variability on the progression of carotid artery intima-media thickness (IMT) in type 2 diabetic patients.

Methods: Among type 2 diabetic patients who visited Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital from March 2007 to September 2009, 120 patients who had carotid artery IMT measured annually and A1C checked every three months for at least one year were analyzed. Individual A1C variability was defined as the standard deviation (SD) of five A1C levels taken every three months for approximately one year. Change in IMT was defined as an increase in IMT on follow-up measurement. The association between the SD of A1C and changes in IMT was evaluated.

Results: With greater A1C variability, there was a greater increase in the mean IMT (r = 0.350, P < 0.001) of the carotid artery. After adjusting for confounding factors that may influence IMT, A1C variability was significantly associated with the progression of IMT (r = 0.222, P = 0.034). However, the SD of A1C was not a significant independent risk factor for the progression of IMT in multiple regression analysis (beta = 0.158, P = 0.093).

Conclusion: Higher A1C variability is associated with IMT progression in type 2 diabetic patients; however, it is not an independent predictor of IMT progression. Overall glycemic control is the most important factor in the progression of IMT.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

A1C变异性是2型糖尿病患者动脉粥样硬化进展的独立预测因子吗?
背景:长期血糖变异性对2型糖尿病大血管并发症风险的相对影响知之甚少。本研究旨在评估A1C变异性对2型糖尿病患者颈动脉内膜-中膜厚度(IMT)进展的影响。方法:对2007年3月至2009年9月在翰林大学圣心医院就诊的2型糖尿病患者进行分析,其中120例患者每年进行颈动脉IMT检测,每3个月检查一次A1C,至少1年。个体A1C变异性被定义为每三个月测量的5个A1C水平的标准差(SD),持续约一年。IMT的变化定义为随访测量时IMT的增加。评估糖化血红蛋白SD值与IMT变化之间的关系。结果:随着A1C变异性的增加,颈动脉平均IMT的增加也越大(r = 0.350, P < 0.001)。在调整了可能影响IMT的混杂因素后,A1C变异性与IMT的进展显著相关(r = 0.222, P = 0.034)。然而,在多元回归分析中,A1C的SD不是IMT进展的重要独立危险因素(β = 0.158, P = 0.093)。结论:较高的A1C变异性与2型糖尿病患者IMT进展相关;然而,它不是IMT进展的独立预测因子。总体血糖控制是IMT进展中最重要的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信