Electromagnetic fields and the blood–brain barrier

Rianne Stam
{"title":"Electromagnetic fields and the blood–brain barrier","authors":"Rianne Stam","doi":"10.1016/j.brainresrev.2010.06.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span>The mammalian blood–brain barrier (BBB) consists of endothelial cells, linked by tight junctions, and the adjoining pericytes and extracellular matrix. It helps maintain a highly stable extracellular environment necessary for accurate synaptic transmission and protects nervous tissue from injury. An increase in its normally low permeability for hydrophilic and charged molecules could potentially be detrimental. Methods to assess the permeability of the BBB include histological </span>staining for marker molecules in brain sections and measurement of the concentration of marker molecules in blood and brain tissue. Their advantages and disadvantages are discussed. Exposure to levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMF) that increase brain temperature by more than 1</span> <span>°C can reversibly increase the permeability of the BBB for macromolecules. The balance of experimental evidence does not support an effect of ‘non-thermal’ radiofrequency fields with microwave and mobile phone frequencies on BBB permeability. Evidence for an effect of the EMF generated by magnetic resonance imaging on permeability is conflicting and conclusions are hampered by potential confounders and simultaneous exposure to different types and frequencies of EMF. The literature on effects of low frequency EMF, which do not cause tissue heating, is sparse and does not yet permit any conclusions on permeability changes. Studies on the potential effect of EMF exposure on permeability of the BBB in humans are virtually absent. Future permeability studies should focus on low frequency effects and effects in humans. Care should be taken to avoid the methodological limitations of earlier studies and to determine the pathophysiological relevance of any changes found.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":9291,"journal":{"name":"Brain Research Reviews","volume":"65 1","pages":"Pages 80-97"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.brainresrev.2010.06.001","citationCount":"90","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain Research Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165017310000718","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 90

Abstract

The mammalian blood–brain barrier (BBB) consists of endothelial cells, linked by tight junctions, and the adjoining pericytes and extracellular matrix. It helps maintain a highly stable extracellular environment necessary for accurate synaptic transmission and protects nervous tissue from injury. An increase in its normally low permeability for hydrophilic and charged molecules could potentially be detrimental. Methods to assess the permeability of the BBB include histological staining for marker molecules in brain sections and measurement of the concentration of marker molecules in blood and brain tissue. Their advantages and disadvantages are discussed. Exposure to levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMF) that increase brain temperature by more than 1 °C can reversibly increase the permeability of the BBB for macromolecules. The balance of experimental evidence does not support an effect of ‘non-thermal’ radiofrequency fields with microwave and mobile phone frequencies on BBB permeability. Evidence for an effect of the EMF generated by magnetic resonance imaging on permeability is conflicting and conclusions are hampered by potential confounders and simultaneous exposure to different types and frequencies of EMF. The literature on effects of low frequency EMF, which do not cause tissue heating, is sparse and does not yet permit any conclusions on permeability changes. Studies on the potential effect of EMF exposure on permeability of the BBB in humans are virtually absent. Future permeability studies should focus on low frequency effects and effects in humans. Care should be taken to avoid the methodological limitations of earlier studies and to determine the pathophysiological relevance of any changes found.

电磁场和血脑屏障
哺乳动物血脑屏障(BBB)由紧密连接的内皮细胞和毗邻的周细胞和细胞外基质组成。它有助于维持一个高度稳定的细胞外环境,这是准确的突触传递所必需的,并保护神经组织免受损伤。对亲水分子和带电分子来说,其通常低渗透率的增加可能是有害的。评估血脑屏障通透性的方法包括脑切片标记分子的组织学染色和血液和脑组织中标记分子浓度的测定。讨论了它们的优缺点。暴露在射频电磁场(EMF)水平下,使大脑温度升高1°C以上,可以可逆地增加血脑屏障对大分子的渗透性。实验证据的平衡不支持微波和手机频率的“非热”射频场对血脑屏障渗透率的影响。关于磁共振成像产生的电磁场对磁导率影响的证据是相互矛盾的,结论受到潜在混杂因素和同时暴露于不同类型和频率的电磁场的影响而受到阻碍。低频电磁场不会引起组织发热,但关于其影响的文献很少,而且还不能得出关于磁导率变化的任何结论。关于电磁场暴露对人血脑屏障通透性的潜在影响的研究几乎没有。未来的渗透率研究应侧重于低频效应和对人体的影响。应注意避免早期研究的方法学局限性,并确定所发现的任何变化的病理生理学相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Brain Research Reviews
Brain Research Reviews 医学-神经科学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信