Does electrode placement influence quality of intraoperative monitoring in vestibular schwannoma surgery?

Central European Neurosurgery Pub Date : 2011-02-01 Epub Date: 2010-06-11 DOI:10.1055/s-0030-1253350
S Rampp, J Prell, J C Rachinger, C Scheller, C Strauss
{"title":"Does electrode placement influence quality of intraoperative monitoring in vestibular schwannoma surgery?","authors":"S Rampp,&nbsp;J Prell,&nbsp;J C Rachinger,&nbsp;C Scheller,&nbsp;C Strauss","doi":"10.1055/s-0030-1253350","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Object: </strong>Continuous recording of electromyographic signals (EMG) is a standard method for intraoperative monitoring of facial nerve function in cerebello-pontine angle surgery. Subcutaneous needle electrodes in the facial muscles are used in different setups. The goal of this study was to compare two commonly used electrode setups concering sensitivity for pathological EMG activity.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A group of 10 patients undergoing vestibular schwannoma surgery were examined. Continuous EMG from facial muscles was recorded using needle electrodes in setups according to Kartush or Møller, with narrow or wide interelectrode distances, respectively. Quantity of pathological A-train activity and signal-to-noise ratios were compared between setups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A-train activity was seen in all patients. On average, 37% of A-train activity was seen in the Kartush setup alone, 4% in Møller setups alone and 59% in both setups synchronously (p<0.05; ratio of median train time--Kartush:Møller 3:2). The wide interelectrode distance of the Møller setup was found to be significantly more susceptible to artefacts, especially to low frequency and power line noise. Artefacts were the main reason for the Møller setup to fail detecting A-train activity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For continuous intraoperative monitoring of facial nerve function, narrow interelectrode distance should be used.</p>","PeriodicalId":51241,"journal":{"name":"Central European Neurosurgery","volume":"72 1","pages":"22-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1055/s-0030-1253350","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Central European Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0030-1253350","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2010/6/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

Object: Continuous recording of electromyographic signals (EMG) is a standard method for intraoperative monitoring of facial nerve function in cerebello-pontine angle surgery. Subcutaneous needle electrodes in the facial muscles are used in different setups. The goal of this study was to compare two commonly used electrode setups concering sensitivity for pathological EMG activity.

Patients and methods: A group of 10 patients undergoing vestibular schwannoma surgery were examined. Continuous EMG from facial muscles was recorded using needle electrodes in setups according to Kartush or Møller, with narrow or wide interelectrode distances, respectively. Quantity of pathological A-train activity and signal-to-noise ratios were compared between setups.

Results: A-train activity was seen in all patients. On average, 37% of A-train activity was seen in the Kartush setup alone, 4% in Møller setups alone and 59% in both setups synchronously (p<0.05; ratio of median train time--Kartush:Møller 3:2). The wide interelectrode distance of the Møller setup was found to be significantly more susceptible to artefacts, especially to low frequency and power line noise. Artefacts were the main reason for the Møller setup to fail detecting A-train activity.

Conclusions: For continuous intraoperative monitoring of facial nerve function, narrow interelectrode distance should be used.

电极放置是否影响前庭神经鞘瘤手术中术中监测的质量?
目的:连续记录肌电信号(EMG)是小脑-脑桥角手术术中面神经功能监测的标准方法。面部肌肉的皮下针电极在不同的设置中使用。本研究的目的是比较两种常用的电极设置对病理肌电图活动的敏感性。患者和方法:对10例前庭神经鞘瘤手术患者进行了检查。根据Kartush或Møller的设置,使用针电极记录面部肌肉的连续肌电图,电极间距分别较窄或较宽。病理a序列活性的数量和信噪比在两组之间进行比较。结果:所有患者均可见a系活动。平均而言,单独使用Kartush装置可观察到37%的A-train活动,单独使用Møller装置可观察到4%的A-train活动,同时使用两种装置可观察到59%的A-train活动(结论:术中持续监测面神经功能应使用窄电极间距离。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Central European Neurosurgery
Central European Neurosurgery CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-NEUROSCIENCES
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信