[Impact of HAPO study findings on future diagnostics and therapy of gestational diabetes].

Gynakologisch-geburtshilfliche Rundschau Pub Date : 2009-01-01 Epub Date: 2010-05-19 DOI:10.1159/000301083
Ute Schäfer-Graf
{"title":"[Impact of HAPO study findings on future diagnostics and therapy of gestational diabetes].","authors":"Ute Schäfer-Graf","doi":"10.1159/000301083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Hyperglycemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcome (HAPO) Study is a trial on a high evidence level that included 25,000 women recruited in 15 centers all over the world who underwent a 75-gram oral glucose tolerance test (oGTT) at 24-32 weeks of gestation. Data remained blinded if the fasting plasma glucose level was below 105 mg/dl (5.8 mmol/l) and the 2-hour plasma glucose level was below 200 mg/dl (11.1 mmol/l). The aim of the study was to clarify whether maternal hyperglycemia less severe than that in diabetes mellitus is associated with increased risks of adverse pregnancy outcomes. The results indicate a continuous association of maternal glucose levels below those diagnostic of diabetes with an adverse outcome, with the strongest risk for increased birth weight and cord blood serum C peptide levels indicating fetal hyperinsulinism. Additionally an increased risk for maternal complications like preeclampsia was seen. Like in many biological processes, there were no obvious thresholds at which risks increased. An international expert committee proposed how to transfer the HAPO data into criteria for the oGTT in pregnancy for the future diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) which will be based on acute pregnancy problems in contrast to the recent Carpenter and Coustan criteria. The availability of uniform, internationally accepted and applied GDM criteria will provide more clinical and legal security for the caregivers which will be a big advantage also in Germany where a wide diversity of GDM criteria is used. Beside the threshold discussion, the HAPO data are of enormous relevance for Germany. The HAPO data will significantly influence the decision of the German Health Authorities whether to finally establish a general screening for GDM as obligatory part of prenatal care. A report from the German Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care (IQWiG) which was ordered from the German Health Authorities describes--mainly based on the HAPO Study--an indirect benefit of blood glucose screening for GDM for all pregnant women.</p>","PeriodicalId":12827,"journal":{"name":"Gynakologisch-geburtshilfliche Rundschau","volume":"49 4","pages":"254-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000301083","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gynakologisch-geburtshilfliche Rundschau","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000301083","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2010/5/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

The Hyperglycemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcome (HAPO) Study is a trial on a high evidence level that included 25,000 women recruited in 15 centers all over the world who underwent a 75-gram oral glucose tolerance test (oGTT) at 24-32 weeks of gestation. Data remained blinded if the fasting plasma glucose level was below 105 mg/dl (5.8 mmol/l) and the 2-hour plasma glucose level was below 200 mg/dl (11.1 mmol/l). The aim of the study was to clarify whether maternal hyperglycemia less severe than that in diabetes mellitus is associated with increased risks of adverse pregnancy outcomes. The results indicate a continuous association of maternal glucose levels below those diagnostic of diabetes with an adverse outcome, with the strongest risk for increased birth weight and cord blood serum C peptide levels indicating fetal hyperinsulinism. Additionally an increased risk for maternal complications like preeclampsia was seen. Like in many biological processes, there were no obvious thresholds at which risks increased. An international expert committee proposed how to transfer the HAPO data into criteria for the oGTT in pregnancy for the future diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) which will be based on acute pregnancy problems in contrast to the recent Carpenter and Coustan criteria. The availability of uniform, internationally accepted and applied GDM criteria will provide more clinical and legal security for the caregivers which will be a big advantage also in Germany where a wide diversity of GDM criteria is used. Beside the threshold discussion, the HAPO data are of enormous relevance for Germany. The HAPO data will significantly influence the decision of the German Health Authorities whether to finally establish a general screening for GDM as obligatory part of prenatal care. A report from the German Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care (IQWiG) which was ordered from the German Health Authorities describes--mainly based on the HAPO Study--an indirect benefit of blood glucose screening for GDM for all pregnant women.

[HAPO研究结果对妊娠期糖尿病未来诊断和治疗的影响]。
高血糖和不良妊娠结局(HAPO)研究是一项高证据水平的试验,包括来自世界各地15个中心的25,000名妇女,她们在妊娠24-32周时接受了75克口服葡萄糖耐量试验(oGTT)。如果空腹血糖水平低于105 mg/dl (5.8 mmol/l),且2小时血糖水平低于200 mg/dl (11.1 mmol/l),则数据保持盲法。该研究的目的是澄清是否母亲的高血糖不严重于糖尿病是否与不良妊娠结局的风险增加有关。结果表明,孕妇血糖水平低于糖尿病诊断值与不良结果持续相关,出生体重增加的风险最大,脐带血血清C肽水平升高表明胎儿高胰岛素血症。此外,产妇并发症如先兆子痫的风险也有所增加。与许多生物过程一样,没有明显的阈值表明风险会增加。一个国际专家委员会提出了如何将HAPO数据转化为妊娠期oGTT的标准,以用于妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)的未来诊断,该标准将基于急性妊娠问题,而不是最近的Carpenter和Coustan标准。统一的、国际上接受和应用的GDM标准的可用性将为护理人员提供更多的临床和法律保障,这在使用多种GDM标准的德国也将是一个很大的优势。除了阈值讨论之外,HAPO的数据与德国有着巨大的相关性。HAPO的数据将显著影响德国卫生当局的决定,即是否最终将GDM的一般筛查作为产前护理的强制性部分。从德国卫生当局订购的德国卫生保健质量和效率研究所(IQWiG)的一份报告描述了-主要基于HAPO研究-对所有孕妇进行GDM的血糖筛查的间接益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信