Variations in life expectancy between rural and urban areas of England, 2001-07.

Lynsey Kyte, Claudia Wells
{"title":"Variations in life expectancy between rural and urban areas of England, 2001-07.","authors":"Lynsey Kyte,&nbsp;Claudia Wells","doi":"10.1057/hsq.2010.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study was part of a wider project commissioned by the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) to examine inequalities in health outcomes in rural areas. It investigated variations in life expectancy at birth between rural and urban areas of England, taking the effect of deprivation into account. The study aimed to produce results which provide specific evidence of the needs of rural communities, as they have often been overlooked in previous research.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Rural and Urban Area Classification (RUAC) 2004 and the Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) 2007 were used to categorise area types at the Lower Super Output Area (LSOA) level. Population and mortality data used were produced by the Office for National Statistics (ONS). Abridged life tables were constructed to calculate period life expectancy at birth for males and females, for the years 2001 to 2007 combined. Confidence intervals (95%) were also produced.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For the 2001-07 period, life expectancy at birth in England was 76.9 years for males and 81.3 years for females. However, when deprivation was examined, results between the most deprived and least deprived quintiles varied by 7.8 years for men and 5.4 years for women.Overall, life expectancy was higher in rural areas than in urban areas. Deprivation had a considerable impact on the results and wide inequalities were evident, particularly in men and in urban areas. In both area types, males living in the less deprived quintiles had similar life expectancies to females living in the more deprived quintiles.Within rural area types, life expectancy was higher in village and dispersed settlements than in town and fringe areas. There were large differences between the fourth and fifth (most deprived) quintiles in village and dispersed settlements, which shows that there may be acute pockets of deprivation within this area type that need to be addressed.In terms of sparsity, there was little difference in life expectancy between densely and less densely populated localities within rural and urban areas. However, variations were observed when deprivation was taken into account and greater differences were evident in less sparse areas than in sparse areas.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There were clear inequalities in life expectancy between rural and urban areas in England. There were also intricate differences within area types, which can be overlooked when only examining differences between them. The results were consistent with the findings of previous studies and demonstrated that it is important to examine differences in life expectancy in both area and deprivation contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":87183,"journal":{"name":"Health statistics quarterly","volume":" 46","pages":"25-50"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1057/hsq.2010.10","citationCount":"22","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health statistics quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1057/hsq.2010.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

Abstract

Background: This study was part of a wider project commissioned by the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) to examine inequalities in health outcomes in rural areas. It investigated variations in life expectancy at birth between rural and urban areas of England, taking the effect of deprivation into account. The study aimed to produce results which provide specific evidence of the needs of rural communities, as they have often been overlooked in previous research.

Methods: The Rural and Urban Area Classification (RUAC) 2004 and the Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) 2007 were used to categorise area types at the Lower Super Output Area (LSOA) level. Population and mortality data used were produced by the Office for National Statistics (ONS). Abridged life tables were constructed to calculate period life expectancy at birth for males and females, for the years 2001 to 2007 combined. Confidence intervals (95%) were also produced.

Results: For the 2001-07 period, life expectancy at birth in England was 76.9 years for males and 81.3 years for females. However, when deprivation was examined, results between the most deprived and least deprived quintiles varied by 7.8 years for men and 5.4 years for women.Overall, life expectancy was higher in rural areas than in urban areas. Deprivation had a considerable impact on the results and wide inequalities were evident, particularly in men and in urban areas. In both area types, males living in the less deprived quintiles had similar life expectancies to females living in the more deprived quintiles.Within rural area types, life expectancy was higher in village and dispersed settlements than in town and fringe areas. There were large differences between the fourth and fifth (most deprived) quintiles in village and dispersed settlements, which shows that there may be acute pockets of deprivation within this area type that need to be addressed.In terms of sparsity, there was little difference in life expectancy between densely and less densely populated localities within rural and urban areas. However, variations were observed when deprivation was taken into account and greater differences were evident in less sparse areas than in sparse areas.

Conclusions: There were clear inequalities in life expectancy between rural and urban areas in England. There were also intricate differences within area types, which can be overlooked when only examining differences between them. The results were consistent with the findings of previous studies and demonstrated that it is important to examine differences in life expectancy in both area and deprivation contexts.

2001- 2007年英格兰城乡预期寿命差异。
背景:这项研究是环境、食品和农村事务部(Defra)委托的一个更广泛项目的一部分,目的是检查农村地区健康结果的不平等。它调查了英格兰农村和城市地区出生时预期寿命的差异,并将贫困的影响考虑在内。这项研究的目的是得出结果,为农村社区的需求提供具体证据,因为它们在以前的研究中经常被忽视。方法:采用2004年《城乡划分》(RUAC)和2007年《多重剥夺指数》(IMD)对低超级产出区(LSOA)水平的区域类型进行划分。使用的人口和死亡率数据由英国国家统计局(ONS)提供。构建了简化的生命表,以计算2001年至2007年男性和女性出生时的预期寿命。还产生了置信区间(95%)。结果:2001- 2007年期间,英格兰男性出生时预期寿命为76.9岁,女性为81.3岁。然而,当对贫困状况进行调查时,最贫困和最贫困五分之一之间的结果差异为男性7.8岁,女性5.4岁。总体而言,农村地区的预期寿命高于城市地区。贫困对结果有相当大的影响,普遍的不平等现象很明显,特别是在男子和城市地区。在这两种地区类型中,生活在贫困程度较低的五分之一的男性与生活在贫困程度较高的五分之一的女性的预期寿命相似。在农村地区类型中,村庄和分散住区的预期寿命高于城镇和边缘地区。在村庄和分散住区中,第四和第五(最贫困)五分之一之间存在很大差异,这表明在这类地区中可能存在需要解决的严重贫困问题。就稀疏性而言,农村和城市地区人口稠密和人口不稠密地区的预期寿命差别不大。然而,当考虑到剥夺时,可以观察到变化,并且在稀疏的地区比稀疏的地区差异更大。结论:英格兰农村和城市地区的预期寿命存在明显的不平等。区域类型之间也存在复杂的差异,这在只研究它们之间的差异时可能会被忽视。研究结果与之前的研究结果一致,并表明在地区和贫困背景下研究预期寿命的差异是很重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书